Stellar corpse sheds light on origin of cosmic rays

September 4, 2017
This composite image of the Crab Nebula was assembled with arbitrary color scaling by combining data from five telescopes spanning nearly the entire electromagnetic spectrum: the radio emission representing the wind of charged particles from the central neutron star in red (from the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array), the infrared including the glow of dust particles absorbing ultraviolet and visible light in yellow (from the Spitzer Space Telescope), the visible-light image featuring the hot filamentary structures in green (from the Hubble Space Telescope), the ultraviolet image in blue and the X-ray image in purple showing the effect of an energetic cloud of electrons (from the XMM-Newton Observatory and the Chandra X-ray Observatory). Credit: NASA / ESA / NRAO / AUI / NSF and G. Dubner (University of Buenos Aires)

The origin of cosmic rays, high-energy particles from outer space constantly impacting on Earth, is among the most challenging open questions in astrophysics. Now new research published in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society sheds new light on the origin of those energetic particles.

Discovered more than 100 years ago and considered a potential health risk to airplane crews and astronauts, cosmic rays are believed to be produced by shock waves—for example, those resulting from supernova explosions. The most streaking across the universe carry 10 to 100 million times the energy generated by particle colliders such as the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.

The Crab Nebula, the remnant of a supernova explosion that was observed almost 1,000 years ago in A.D. 1054, is one of the best-studied objects in the history of astronomy and a known source of . It emits radiation across the entire electromagnetic spectrum, from gamma rays, ultraviolet and visible light, to infrared and radio waves. Most of what we see comes from very (electrons), and astrophysicists can construct detailed models to try to reproduce the radiation that these particles emit.

The new study, by Federico Fraschetti at the University of Arizona, USA, and Martin Pohl at the University of Potsdam, Germany, reveals that the electromagnetic radiation streaming from the Crab Nebula may originate in a different way than scientists have traditionally thought: The entire zoo of radiation can potentially be unified and arise from a single population of electrons, a hypothesis previously deemed impossible.

According to the generally accepted model, once the particles reach a shock boundary, they bounce back and forth many times due to the magnetic turbulence. During this process they gain energy—in a similar way to a tennis ball being bounced between two rackets that are steadily moving nearer to each other—and are pushed closer and closer to the speed of light. Such a model follows an idea introduced by the Italian physicist Enrico Fermi in 1949.

"The current models do not include what happens when the particles reach their highest energy," said Federico, a staff scientist at the University of Arizona's Departments of Planetary Sciences, Astronomy and Physics. "Only if we include a different process of acceleration, in which the number of higher energy particles decreases faster than at lower energy, can we explain the entire electromagnetic spectrum we see. This tells us that while the shock wave is the source of the acceleration of the particles, the mechanisms must be different."

Co-author Martin Pohl added: "The new result represents an important advance for our understanding of particle acceleration in cosmic objects, and helps to decipher the origin of the energetic particles that are found almost everywhere in the universe."

The authors conclude that a better understanding is needed of how particles are accelerated in cosmic sources, and how the acceleration works when the of the becomes very large. Several NASA missions, including ACE, STEREO and WIND, are dedicated to studying the similar properties of shocks caused by plasma explosions on the surface of the sun as they travel to Earth, and so may add vital insights into these effects in the near future.

Explore further: Astrophysicists explain the mysterious behavior of cosmic rays

More information: F. Fraschetti et al, Particle acceleration model for the broad-band baseline spectrum of the Crab nebula, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2017). DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1833

Related Stories

Ripples in space key to understanding cosmic rays

October 17, 2016

In a new study researchers at the Swedish Institute of Space Physics have used measurements from NASA's MMS (Magnetospheric MultiScale) satellites to reveal that there are ripples, or surface waves, moving along the surface ...

Fields and flows fire up cosmic accelerators

May 16, 2017

Every day, with little notice, the Earth is bombarded by energetic particles that shower its inhabitants in an invisible dusting of radiation, observed only by the random detector, or astronomer, or physicist duly noting ...

NASA finds unusual origins of high-energy electrons

November 14, 2016

High above the surface, Earth's magnetic field constantly deflects incoming supersonic particles from the sun. These particles are disturbed in regions just outside of Earth's magnetic field - and some are reflected into ...

New type of cosmic ray discovered after 100 years

October 16, 2012

(Phys.org)—Using the European X-ray astronomy satellite XMM-Newton, researchers from CNRS and CEA have discovered a new source of cosmic rays. In the vicinity of the remarkable Arches cluster, near the center of the Milky ...

Recommended for you

Dawn mission extended at Ceres

October 20, 2017

NASA has authorized a second extension of the Dawn mission at Ceres, the largest object in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter. During this extension, the spacecraft will descend to lower altitudes than ever before ...

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Chris_Reeve
1.8 / 5 (5) Sep 04, 2017
The irony of their confusion is perhaps best understood by Googling the question "how does a particle accelerator work?"

https://energy.go...ors-work

"Particle accelerators use electric fields to speed up and increase the energy of a beam of particles, which are steered and focused by magnetic fields."

So, why don't astrophysicists and cosmologists simply consider that cosmic E-fields, rather than shock waves, are responsible for cosmic rays?

Importance of electric fields in modeling space plasmas
Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics
George K. Parks

"Many space plasma models use magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) theory with the approximation that the high conductivity of plasmas does not support electric fields in the fluid frame (ideal approximation)."
Chris_Reeve
1.8 / 5 (5) Sep 04, 2017
(cont'd)

"We will show that the small E-field is what allows particles to move & interact with each other. Without this E-field, physics loses consistency. In ideal MHD theory, there is no electromotive force (EMF) & hence the total magnetic flux is conserved leading to the frozen-in field concept ... If ideal MHD theory is applied from the outset, the theory can describe only pre-existing fields & currents that are frozen in the plasma. No new dynamics can be produced. A real understanding of space plasma must include the behavior of time-dependent fields & currents & not be limited to just the frozen-in fields & currents ..."

(cont'd)
Chris_Reeve
1.8 / 5 (5) Sep 04, 2017
(cont'd)

"... The ideal MHD theory was introduced by Alfven when he was studying the behavior of MHD waves. He formulated the wave equation for finite conductivity fluid, incorporating Ohm's law which allowed currents to flow ... After he derived the wave equation which included the dissipative term, he studied the behavior of the waves imagining the fluid had infinite conductivity. This led to the concept of the frozen-in magnetic field but only as a limiting case. However, since Alfven's work, space theorists have ignored the small E-field from the outset ..."

(cont'd)
Chris_Reeve
1.8 / 5 (5) Sep 04, 2017
(cont'd)

"... Although the E-field in the plasma frame is small, theories must start with the full equation E' = E + V x B since otherwise the theory precludes induction of the EMF. If E' = 0 from the outset as in ideal MHD theory, the formulation only incorporates frozen-in physics. This is because the electric force the particles experience vanishes, & plasmas will lose the capability to interact. Therefore, no new currents will be generated & ideal MHD theory is restricted to describing only preexisting electromagnetic fields & currents that are frozen in the plasma. This theory cannot account for the production of boundaries nor can it describe dynamic phenomena such as auroras & flares that require generation of new currents. The importance of currents in dynamic plasmas has been repeatedly emphasized by Alfven (1977)."
Da Schneib
not rated yet Sep 04, 2017
A recent article on this site questions whether supernovae are the source of cosmic rays. https://phys.org/...ays.html

I found the handwaving over electrons in the current article disingenuous to say the least.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.