People's love of the seas could be the key for plastic pollution solution

September 18, 2017, University of Plymouth
Tiny plastic fragments found in samples of sea water tested at the University of Plymouth. Credit: University of Plymouth

Tapping into the public's passion for the ocean environment could be the key to reducing the threats posed to it by plastic pollution, a new report suggests.

Millions of tons of accumulate in our seas each year as a result of human behaviour, and once there they have a potentially detrimental effect on marine life.

But reversing this trend, and finding ways to maintain both the health of our oceans and the human benefits associated with it, is a complicated task.

Writing in Nature Human Behaviour, academics from the University of Plymouth and the University of Surrey identify recent examples where public pressure has led to policy change, including levies on single-use bags and bans on the use of microbeads in cosmetics.

But while these are steps in the right direction, they are not addressing either the root causes or lasting effects of the problem, with the report saying there needs to be a more joined-up and interdisciplinary approach going forward.

Dr Sabine Pahl, Associate Professor (Reader) in Psychology and lead author on the report, said: "The public's love of the coast is obvious, so it stands to reason that they would play a role in preserving its future. Plastic pollution is a problem for all in society and while there are solutions out there, they must be socially acceptable as well as economically and technically viable. We need to work together across disciplines and sectors to build on the strength of humans to facilitate change."

Dr Kayleigh Wyles, Environmental Psychology Lecturer at the University of Surrey, added: "From previous research we know that people appreciate and value the importance of the ocean and see as a global problem. Yet, the challenge is connecting the dots. So many of our behaviours and decisions contribute to this problem (and optimistically to the solutions), but at those particular points of time, we often don't think of how they can impact the environment. Using behavioural sciences to understand drivers of will therefore help support ongoing initiatives that can look to clean up our environments."

The authors of the report have previously collaborated on research which demonstrated that marine litter can undermine the benefits of coastal environments.

In this study, they say ocean poses similar challenges to other environmental threats because the symptoms are often considered remote from the largely land-based causes.

This has been linked to a perceived lack of urgency to tackle the , but the academics says it should in fact be used as an incentive to encourage people to act.

They suggest the public could potentially become motivated if powerful images were carried on everyday products, similar to that already being used on cigarette packaging.

However, they warn that such 'fear' appeals cannot be seen as a complete solution and that any successful campaign would need to make people appreciate the problem and that they can play an important part in the solution.

Professor Richard Thompson, Director of Plymouth's International Marine Litter Research Unit, was a significant contributor to the UK Government's inquiries into both microplastics and the use of microbeads in cosmetics. He added: "There is now considerable awareness of the problem of litter at sea. But this is merely a symptom of a much more systemic problem driven by production, use and disposal of plastics on the land. To make progress here we need behavioural change right along the supply chain and our paper indicates some of the key actions that are needed."

Explore further: Marine litter undermines benefits of coastal environments

More information: Sabine Pahl et al, Channelling passion for the ocean towards plastic pollution, Nature Human Behaviour (2017). DOI: 10.1038/s41562-017-0204-4

Related Stories

Can beach cleans do more than clean up litter?

June 17, 2016

Volunteer beach cleans may only make a small contribution to the presence and prevalence of marine litter but could have numerous benefits to those involved and to the environment, new research suggests.

Recommended for you

Asteroids, hydrogen make great recipe for life on Mars

March 26, 2019

A new study reveals asteroid impacts on ancient Mars could have produced key ingredients for life if the Martian atmosphere was rich in hydrogen. An early hydrogen-rich atmosphere on Mars could also explain how the planet ...

Cool Earth theory sheds more light on diamonds

March 26, 2019

A QUT geologist has published a new theory on the thermal evolution of Earth billions of years ago that explains why diamonds have formed as precious gemstones rather than just lumps of common graphite.

New cellulose-based material represents three sensors in one

March 26, 2019

Cellulose soaked in a carefully designed polymer mixture acts as a sensor to measure pressure, temperature and humidity at the same time. The measurements are completely independent of each other. The ability to measure pressure, ...

Physicists discover new class of pentaquarks

March 26, 2019

Tomasz Skwarnicki, professor of physics in the College of Arts and Sciences at Syracuse University, has uncovered new information about a class of particles called pentaquarks. His findings could lead to a new understanding ...

Study finds people who feed birds impact conservation

March 26, 2019

People in many parts of the world feed birds in their backyards, often due to a desire to help wildlife or to connect with nature. In the United States alone, over 57 million households in the feed backyard birds, spending ...

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

aksdad
1 / 5 (1) Sep 19, 2017
Unfortunately none of the proposed solutions, including taxing or banning single-use plastic bags, will reduce plastic in the oceans. Like many of the impractical and ineffective solutions proposed by environmental alarmists, the main effect is to soothe their overwrought sense of guilt while accomplishing essentially nothing. The dumping of trash at sea--including plastic--has been banned for decades in all western countries and Europe. Most of the plastic in the oceans comes from poor and developing countries in southeast Asia, Africa and other places. Until they stop allowing trash, and plastic, to enter the oceans, any restrictions on westerners will produce no useful effect.
MarsBars
1 / 5 (1) Sep 19, 2017
Unfortunately none of the proposed solutions, including taxing or banning single-use plastic bags, will reduce plastic in the oceans...
Most of the plastic in the oceans comes from poor and developing countries in southeast Asia, Africa and other places. Until they stop allowing trash, and plastic, to enter the oceans, any restrictions on westerners will produce no useful effect.

Tackling the problem has to start somewhere, @aksdad. If everyone waits for someone else to do something first, nothing will happen. Plus you are incorrect about countries in Africa not stopping plastic trash. African countries started taking action on plastic bags more than a decade ago, long before Europe or the U.S.A. Now over 15 African countries ban or tax plastic bags, and it appears that Nigeria will soon be added to that list. Try doing a little research before spouting off your uninformed opinions.
aksdad
1 / 5 (1) Sep 19, 2017
Tackling the problem has to start somewhere

...only if the solution actually mitigates the problem. There is no evidence that banning single-use plastic bags reduces trash in the oceans. Those bans are in countries that already have mature waste management practices. Banning them only reduces their relatively minimal accumulation in landfills.

A 2006 U.K. Environment Agency study of common types of shopping bags found that the single-use high-density polyethylene (HDPE) had the lowest overall environmental impact.

When each bag was compared with no primary reuse (i.e. no reuse as a carrier bag), the conventional HDPE bag had the lowest environmental impacts of in eight of the nine impact categories


When they are re-used, for example as trash bin liners as is common, their environmental impact is even lower.

https://www.gov.u...-e-e.pdf

But that's just my uninformed opinion.

aksdad
1 / 5 (1) Sep 19, 2017
The plastic bag bans in many African nations may slightly reduce plastic in the oceans because they have notoriously poor waste management resulting in trash of all kinds ending up in the oceans. In their case, though, because waste management is so poor, and HDPE bags make up such a small portion of total plastic waste by volume, the much larger problem of plastic in the oceans is hardly addressed. The proven solution so far is proper waste management.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.