Higher precision measurements show proton mass less than thought

July 5, 2017 by Bob Yirka, Phys.org report
Sketch of the trap setup. The trap tower includes two separate storage traps (ST-I, ST-II), the measurement trap (MT) and a reference trap (RT) for magnetic field monitoring, which is presently not used. Ions are created in-situ using a mini-EBIT. By shuttling the ions between the storage traps and the MT, the time between successive measurements is minimized. Individual superconducting detection circuits for the proton (blue) and for the carbon ion (red), allow measurements at the identical electrostatic field configurations and thus guarantee the identical position and magnetic field. Credit: arXiv:1706.06780 [physics.atom-ph]

(Phys.org)—An international team of researchers has developed a new way to measure the mass of a proton and found the particle to be approximately 30 billionths of a percent less than previously thought. The group has written a paper describing their process and results and have uploaded it to the prepress server arXiv.

For some time now, the atomic of a has been an accepted standard measurement used to calculate other physics properties. Now, it appears researchers may have to revisit some of those entities as the most accurate ever measurement of the mass of a proton shows less mass than has been believed.

In this new effort, the researchers fired an electron beam at a selected target atom held in a chilled vacuum chamber, releasing a proton. The group was then able to isolate the proton in a Penning trap, which is a device that creates both an electronic and magnetic field. Inside the trap, the proton moved in circles—measuring its velocity allowed the researchers to calculate its mass, which was 1.007 276 466 583(15)(29) units. The 15 in parentheses represented the statistical uncertainty and the 29 that followed represented the systematic uncertainty.

The group reports that their was three times more precise than any other technique used to date.

Others have noted that making more precise measurements of protons and other particles could explain some of the big mysteries in physics—such as why the radius of a proton has been found to be smaller than theory has suggested, or why there is more matter than antimatter. It could also help research efforts exploring apparent discrepancies between protons and antiprotons.

The research group has made clear its plans to continue refining its measuring technique—their goal is to improve the measurement for a proton by a factor of six. Meanwhile, if others are able to reproduce the work by the team, the new measurement could be included in the newest CODATA, which is scheduled for publishing in just a few months.

Explore further: Improved measurements of antiproton's magnetic moment deepen mystery of baryonic asymmetry

More information: High-precision measurement of the proton's atomic mass, arXiv:1706.06780 [physics.atom-ph] arxiv.org/abs/1706.06780

Abstract
We report on the precise measurement of the atomic mass of a single proton with a purpose-built Penning-trap system. With a precision of 32 parts-per-trillion our result not only improves on the current CODATA literature value by a factor of three, but also disagrees with it at a level of about 3 standard deviations.

Related Stories

Zeroing in on the proton's magnetic moment

May 28, 2014

As part of a series of experiments designed to resolve one of the deepest mysteries of physics today, researchers from RIKEN, in collaboration with the University of Mainz, GSI Darmstadt and the Max Planck Institute for Physics ...

Recommended for you

Electrogates offer stop-and-go control in microfluidics

April 24, 2018

Although microfluidics devices have a wide variety of uses, from point-of-care diagnostics to environmental analysis, one major limitation is that they cannot be modified for different uses on the fly, since their flow paths ...

Strained materials make cooler superconductors

April 24, 2018

University of Wisconsin-Madison engineers have added a new dimension to our understanding of why straining a particular group of materials, called Ruddlesden-Popper oxides, tampers with their superconducting properties.

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

TheGhostofOtto1923
4.5 / 5 (2) Jul 05, 2017
" approximately 30 billionths of a percent less than previously thought"

-Huh. This could prove to be a problem as there are so many of them.
Dingbone
Jul 05, 2017
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Whydening Gyre
not rated yet Jul 05, 2017
It could be related to the https://www.scien...0735.htm . Over a period of 110 years, K4 lost 41 µg relative to the IPK. This is way more than 30 billionths of a percent.

All particles decay...
Dingbone
Jul 05, 2017
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.