Magnetic nanoknots evoke Lord Kelvin's vortex theory of atoms

June 23, 2017 by Lisa Zyga feature
Simulations of magnetic skyrmion knots with Hopf charges of (a) 3, (b) 6, (c) 7, and (d) 10. Credit: Sutcliffe. ©2017 American Physical Society

(Phys.org)—In the late 1800s when scientists were still trying to figure out what exactly atoms are, one of the leading theories, proposed by Lord Kelvin, was that atoms are knots of swirling vortices in the aether. Although this idea turned out to be completely wrong, it ushered in modern knot theory, which today is used in various areas of science such as fluid dynamics, the structure of DNA, and the concept of chirality.

Now in a new paper published in Physical Review Letters, mathematical physicist Paul Sutcliffe at Durham University in the UK has theoretically shown that nanoparticles called magnetic skyrmions can be tied into various types of knots with different magnetic properties. He explains that, in a sense, these nanoknots represent a "nanoscale resurrection of Kelvin's dream of knotted fields."

Skyrmions are the name of a general class of particles that are made by twisting a field. When this field is a magnetic field, the skyrmions are called magnetic skyrmions. Magnetic skyrmions have attracted a lot of attention recently due to their potential applications in spintronics, where electron spins (which are related to the electron's magnetic properties) are exploited in the design of transistors, storage media, and related devices.

Magnetic skyrmions were experimentally observed for the first time a few years ago, in thin slices of magnetic materials—basically two-dimensional materials. By showing that magnetic skyrmions can theoretically be tied into knots, the new results move these particles from the two-dimensional world to the three-dimensional one.

"The most significant point is that these nanoknots are stable, because usually fields avoid being knotted by untying themselves," Sutcliffe told Phys.org.

Sutcliffe showed that the skyrmion knots can be characterized by the Hopf charge, which indicates the number of times that a skyrmion's curved magnetic lines are linked with each other. He showed that skyrmions with low Hopf charges tend to form rings, while those with higher Hopf charges form links and knots.

Sutcliffe's investigation focuses on magnetic skyrmions in a particular type of magnet called frustrated magnets, which offer skyrmions an additional rotational degree of freedom compared to other magnetic materials. This flexibility gives skyrmions the extra room needed to be tied into knots.

At the time Sutcliffe was writing his paper, no one had ever observed skyrmions in frustrated magnets. But as a testament to the fast pace of research in this area, just a few days after this publication researchers from China reported the first experimental observations of skyrmions in a frustrated magnet (arXiv:1706.05177 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]).

This result marks an important step toward realizing knotted , and the next challenge will be to find a way to engineer the skyrmions into knots. Recent work on skyrmions has suggested that these particles may be controlled using optical vortex beams, arrays of ferromagnetic nanorods, and other methods. Researchers are also currently developing imaging techniques for skyrmions, which will be essential for the identification of these nanoknots. With new results on skyrmions being reported almost daily, Sutcliffe is optimistic about the prospects of creating knots.

"My future research plans in this area are concerned with studying the formation of these nanoknots, to help develop methods and suggest favorable conditions for experimentalists to create and observe these structures," Sutcliffe said.

Explore further: Neutron scattering clarifies the arrangement of skyrmions in material

More information: Paul Sutcliffe. "Skyrmion Knots in Frustrated Magnets." Physical Review Letters. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.247203 . Also at arXiv:1705.10966 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

Related Stories

The synchronized dance of skyrmion spins

May 30, 2017

In recent years, excitement has swirled around a type of quasi-particle called a skyrmion that arises as a collective behavior of a group of electrons. Because they're stable, only a few nanometers in size, and need just ...

Frustrated magnets point towards new memory

September 23, 2015

Theoretical physicists from the University of Groningen, supported by the FOM Foundation, have discovered that so-called 'frustrated magnets' can produce skyrmions, tiny magnetic vortices that may be used in memory storage. ...

Recommended for you

Vortex photons from electrons in circular motion

July 21, 2017

Researchers at IMS and their coworkers have shown theoretically and experimentally that a high energy electron in circular/spiral motion radiates vortex photons from the radio wavelength to gamma rays. This greatly broadens ...

New model for the origin of grid cells

July 21, 2017

Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich neurobiologists present a new theory for the origin of the grid cells required for spatial orientation in the mammalian brain, which assigns a vital role to the timing of trains of signals ...

12 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Dingbone
2 / 5 (4) Jun 23, 2017
The elementary particles should have knotted structure of skyrmions - proton and neutron, composed of quarks loops like the pieces of LEGO. Also dense stars similar to black holes should maintain these structures in certain stages of their evolution.
rrrander
5 / 5 (2) Jun 24, 2017
I remember some nutjob, a janitor or something, who'd concocted a similar theory of atomic structure.
Dingbone
2 / 5 (4) Jun 24, 2017
The intriguing shapes of many atom orbitals indicate, that Kelvin wasn't so wrong with his model - they resemble knotted loops After all, every standing wave can be decompose to vortices and vice-versa - a good example is Fourier transform. Compare also Snelson model of atom orbitals.
Dingbone
2 / 5 (4) Jun 24, 2017
At the case of atom nuclei the surface vortex model becomes even more pronounced. The first models of nuclear forces considered meson interactions, i.e. essentially vortex pairs floating at the surface of atom nuclei as the main source of nuclear forces. Now we know, that this model was too primitive - but it still manifests itself with curve of binding energies - the atoms with odd number of nucleon have apparently lower stability, than these even numbered ones. So at the case of smaller atom nuclei with high surface/volume ratio the surface vortex model still remains dominant. It's also the main reason, why the atoms don't emanate a lone protons during radioactive decay, but rather more stable alpha particle clusters, which are held together with meson pairs.
Dingbone
2 / 5 (4) Jun 24, 2017
The tiny baryon particles like proton and neutrons exhibit even higher surface/volume ratio, so that for their structures the vortex interactions become dominant. The gluons connecting quarks exhibit behavior typical for vortex tubes and they can be elongated significantly without breaking (which is called quark confinment).
swordsman
5 / 5 (1) Jun 24, 2017
Lord Kelvin's "Plum Pudding" model was intended to be correlated to electromagnetic radiating waves. That, as it turns out, is fairly accurate. He moved his spoon back and forth and observed the physical waves and compared them to the waves of electromagnetic fields. It does not appear that this would produce "knots" as described above.
Dingbone
2 / 5 (4) Jun 24, 2017
Pudding model was proposed by Sir Joseph John Thomson, the discoverer of electron. As an aetherist, he also shared many ideas with Sir William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin though. Starting from Maxwell's electromagnetic fields, namely stresses propagating through a continuous solid medium, Thomson arrived at a representation of fields as a sea of discrete units carrying energy and momentum. He tried to transform Maxwell's theory into a unified picture in which atomic models of matter stood beside atomic models of fields.

The formation of knots is related to symmetry breaking and extradimensions. It's the consequence of quantum field theory, according to which every wave also makes its environment temporarily more dense in similar way, like the shaking of foam makes the foam more dense. This creates additional room and space for more complex undulations and swirling motion.
Dingbone
2 / 5 (4) Jun 24, 2017
The process of knot formation inside the dense media can be observed even by naked eye during slow and controlled condensation of supercritical fluid. At the critical point the density fluctuations will emerge, which will resemble the dynamic foam. This is basically the approach, in which LQG theory models the space-time. But when we would continue with condensation further, then these density fluctuations will grow and merge into an isolated particles, which will occasionally form an independent phase of "metafluid" composed of nested fluctuations of the original fluid. It's particles would form a complex knotted loop condensate after then. Under terrestrial conditions this process is quite fragile, but at the centers of dense stars we can imagine, that these nested fluctuations will condense even more into a complex structures.
AGreatWhopper
3.7 / 5 (3) Jun 25, 2017
The article is about magnetic skyrmions, not some batshit crazy rejigging of a century old debate that hasn't been for a very long time.

Just report Dingbat and don't feed the trolls. And read one of the much better sites that don't have every nutjub on the planet drooling their wisdumb every damned article.

If you really want to save the world from self-impressed idiots, the EU convention is right around the corner. You can collar all the idiots you like. August 17-20, Phoenix. If confronting pseudo-science and outright fraud is really your passion, you must do it. If you settle for feeding the trolls on here, then you're just as sick, sad and sorry as they are.
RealityCheck
1 / 5 (4) Jun 25, 2017
@AGreatWhopper.
Just report Dingbat and don't feed the trolls. And read one of the much better sites...
It would help the forum members greatly if you could post your real name and your list of "better sites" you recommend instead of PO. That way they can gauge better your credibility in this matter; as you attempt to censor.bias science discourse on the net, according to what YOU deem 'acceptable science'. Oh, and before again calling others "nutjobs", it would help your own cause if you first proved to yourself/forum that someone calling themselves "AGreatWhopper" is not the one who is the real "nutjob" in the case. In any case, reality is passing you by. The recent mainstream astro/cosmo/QM physics discoveries/reviews have been proving some of those whom you call "nutjobs" CORRECT all along. So maybe you should listen/learn for a change, @AGW, instead of trying to censor/bias science discussion on the NET. Only 'real whoppers' of a "nutjob" would try that today! :)
swordsman
not rated yet Jun 26, 2017
In reference to my comments above and the response by Dingbone, let me clarify more exactly what Lord Kelvin actually claimed, He pictured electromagnetic waves in the "luminiferous aether" as being stronger than steel and demonstrated the wave effect by waving a stick back and forth in a bowl of jelly, creating semicircular waves that he said are to electromagnetic radiation. In fact, we have known for quite some time that electromagnetic waves from a transmitting antenna appear quite similar to his picture. The leading comments by the author of this article are misleading.
Dingbone
3 / 5 (2) Jun 26, 2017
There was always misunderstanding between aetherists, who considered aether as a thin sparse gas or vector field FILLING the space (T.J.J.See and others) and a luminiferous aether, FORMING the space (O. Lodge). These two models are dual and deeply different each other. Lord Kelvin was somehow inbetween with his stance.

The electroweak theory handles nuclear force in similar way, like these electromagnetic ones and in this regard we can agree with Kelvin, that the standing waves forming particles of matter have immense energy density and frequency. But the electromagnetic waves which are spreading between them aren't particularly dense and they can be hardly compared to steel (they can be shielded with thin layer or conductors).

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.