Air traffic privatization plan hits turbulence in Congress

Air traffic privatization plan hits turbulence in Congress
In this March 16, 2017 photo, air traffic controllers work in the tower at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York. President Donald Trump is looking to shift responsibility for the system from the government to a private, nonprofit corporation run by airlines and other aviation interests. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)

President Donald Trump's plan to privatize the nation's air traffic control system is running into bipartisan opposition in Congress, where Republicans fret that it could raise costs for air travelers and hurt small airports.

Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., called the proposal "a tough sell" in states like his, where small airports are common. At a hearing Wednesday, Wicker told Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao that "the sale needs to be made, and it needs to be made convincingly" if the administration hopes to move forward with a plan that U.S. airlines and some House Republicans have long advocated.

Sen. Jerry Moran, R-Kan., said privatization would hurt "all but our largest airports nationwide," while removing needed congressional oversight and raise costs for consumers.

Democrats also opposed the changes, warning that airline interests would dominate a proposed board that would oversee an estimated 300 facilities and around 30,000 employees.

Lawmakers from both parties also pointed to the unprecedented safety under the current system, noting the last fatal crash of a domestic passenger airliner was eight years ago.

"We currently have the safest air-traffic control system in the world. Why risk that by handing the whole thing over to an untested, unproved entity?" asked Florida Sen. Bill Nelson, the senior Democrat on the Senate Transportation committee.

Air traffic privatization plan hits turbulence in Congress
Rep. Bill Shuster, R-Pa., center, gives two thumbs up as he gets two autographs from President Donald Trump after Trump signs a decision memo and a letter to members of Congress outlining the principles of his plan to privatize the nation's air traffic control system in the East Room at the White House, Monday, June 5, 2017, in Washington. Also pictured from left is former Transportation Secretary Elizabeth Dole, Vice President Mike Pence, second from left, Shuster, and Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, right. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

While the U.S. "remains the gold standard in aviation," the president's plan would spur innovation and modernization, Chao said.

"Our skies are becoming increasingly congested," she said, noting that some domestic flights take longer now than they did decades ago because of congestion and indirect routing.

"Our air traffic organization must be more nimble," Chao said, calling the current system "bulky" and unable to "move fast enough to keep pace with new technologies and new demands."

But Nelson and other Democrats noted repeated computer system failures in recent years by U.S. airlines, questioning whether they are ready to handle complex technology modernizations.

Business aircraft operators, private pilots and nonhub airports have also expressed concerns that they may pay more and receive less service under a private corporation.

U.S. airlines have lobbied to separate from the Federal Aviation Administration for two decades, and Trump's budget plan released earlier this year called for the changes, placing air traffic operations under an "independent, nongovernmental organization."


Explore further

The pros and cons of privatizing air traffic control

© 2017 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

Citation: Air traffic privatization plan hits turbulence in Congress (2017, June 7) retrieved 25 January 2020 from https://phys.org/news/2017-06-air-traffic-privatization-turbulence-congress.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
2 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments