Older, denser neighborhoods offer better access to everyday destinations, study finds

May 4, 2017, University of California, Irvine
“The social goals of lower carbon emissions and less traffic congestion demand that we think about homes in terms of their proximity to destinations,” says Kevin Kane, the MFI report’s lead author and a postdoctoral fellow in planning, policy & design. School of Social Ecology Metropolitan Futures Initiative. Credit: University of California, Irvine

Residents of older, denser, lower-income neighborhoods and smaller, multifamily homes in Southern California can more easily access commonly frequented sites such as grocery stores, restaurants, clothing stores and gas stations, according to a recent report from the University of California, Irvine.

A research team with the School of Social Ecology's Metropolitan Futures Initiative calculated the number of everyday destinations within a mile of each of the region's more than 5 million homes. Closer destinations mean less driving, decreased traffic congestion and lower carbon emissions.

"Accessibility is how we accomplish [these]social goals," said Kevin Kane, the MFI report's lead author and a postdoctoral fellow in planning, policy & design. "In general, smaller, older, multifamily units have better access. However, in each of these cases, there are a handful of cities that don't follow the trend."

Orange County and Southern California as a whole have seen a large increase in multifamily housing in recent years. From the early 1990s to the mid-2000s, developers built huge numbers of single-family homes – and very few multifamily ones. But since the 2008 housing crash, multifamily construction has soared.

"There might be 1,000 new residents living on a fairly small piece of land, but if they have a lot of things they need nearby, there aren't necessarily going to be these congestion impacts that a lot of planning commissions are worried about," Kane said.

People in Los Angeles County – with the smallest, oldest and densest housing – had the highest access to everyday destinations, followed closely by Orange County. The Inland Empire lagged significantly. In addition, Orange County homes were in much greater proximity to open space, while Los Angeles County homes were the closest to train stations.

The study was meant, in part, to test some of the principles of New Urbanism, which advocates environmentally sustainable city designs that promote walkability and reduce sprawl. The team's next step is to examine the effects of specific planning policies, such as main street development plans, zoning density bonuses, transit-oriented development plans and reduced parking requirements.

Other findings:

  • Long Beach had the largest share of homes, apartments and condos – 97 percent – within a mile of everyday destinations.
  • Dwellings in Beverly Hills had the most everyday destinations – an average of 1,573 – within a mile. It makes sense: Major commercial strips run through the middle of the city's boundaries.

Explore further: Research suggests denser development is good for single-family home values

Related Stories

What motivates people to walk and bike? It varies by income

January 6, 2016

Lower- and middle-income King County residents who live in denser neighborhoods—with stores, libraries and other destinations within easy reach—are more likely to walk or bike, according to new University of Washington ...

Recommended for you

How a pair of satellites will 'weigh' water on Earth

May 22, 2018

The reason we know today just how much ice is melting in Greenland and Antarctica is because of a pair of satellites, launched in 2002 by NASA and the German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ). Now, they are set to be ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.