Mouse sperm survives in space, but could human babies?

May 24, 2017
Human sperm stained for semen quality testing in the clinical laboratory. Credit: Bobjgalindo/Wikipedia

Freeze-dried mouse sperm that spent nine months in space has been used to produce healthy rodent offspring back on Earth, Japanese researchers said this week.

But could the same hold true for humans? And if conception were even possible in space, would babies born in zero gravity develop differently than their Earth-bound counterparts?

As NASA and other global space agencies work furiously on propelling people to Mars by the 2030s, experts say essential questions of survival on the Red Planet are often overlooked.

Rocket scientists have little grasp of how humans would live and breathe on Mars, or if they even could withstand the powerful doses of they'd receive on the two- to three-year journey.

A key component to colonizing other planets—as SpaceX chief Elon Musk has vowed to do on Mars—would be having babies, said Kris Lehnhardt, assistant professor in emergency medicine at The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences.

This raises ethical questions about the potential for creating a new race of humans born in deep space or in microgravity.

"If your goal is to eventually be a truly space-faring species then this is an essential area to study," he told AFP.

"It is a completely unknown area of science."

Mouse sperm

A study in Monday's edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, a peer-reviewed US journal, was an "interesting first step," said Lehnhardt, who was not involved in the research.

Mouse sperm was freeze-dried and sent for nine months to the International Space Station, which orbits about 250 miles (400 kilometers) above the Earth.

When the shipment returned, lead researcher Teruhiko Wakayama of the University of Yamanashi found the space sperm had sustained "slightly increased DNA damage," after enduring an average daily radiation dose about 100 times stronger than on Earth.

Back on Earth, embryos fertilized in vitro with the sperm produced healthy offspring, and grew into normal adults, "suggesting that the DNA damage observed in the space-preserved sperm samples was largely repaired in embryos after fertilization," said the report.

But the research revealed little about what might happen in space.

"Everything that happened afterward was on the ground again," Lehnhardt said.

Not good for ovaries

For researchers who have examined the effect of deep space radiation on the reproductive organs of female lab mice, the news is not good.

A study published in the journal Reproduction this month showed that severe damage to the ovaries of female mice exposed to charged particles is typical of space radiation, "raising concern for premature ovarian failure in astronauts" exposed to deep space travel, it said.

One of the study's authors, Ulrike Luderer, a professor of medicine at the University of California, Irvine, said her research shows why the US space agency is worried about the health of deep space astronauts.

"These types of exposures can cause early ovarian failure and ovarian cancer, as well as other osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease and neurocognitive diseases like Alzheimer's," she told AFP.

"Half the astronauts in the NASA's new astronaut classes are women," she added.

"So it is really important to know what chronic health effects there could be for women exposed to long-term radiation."

'Magical leap'

Lehnhardt said he is not aware of any studies that have shown rodents could successfully get pregnant in space, or that embryos could survive there.

"If a four- or eight-cell embryo gets hit by galactic cosmic radiation, the likelihood of that embryo surviving is probably quite low," he said.

"If somehow the embryo could get past that stage we actually have no concept of how that would develop."

Future experiments could involve sending embryos of various species to the station.

But even then, it might be difficult to tease apart whether any problems in development are due to the absence of gravity, or to radiation, said Lehnhardt.

If somehow we took a "magical leap" to the point where an infant could be born in a spaceship, "you have a baby that in theory can't stand or walk, and uses its arms as it is developing for movement," he said, warning of the potential for a new evolutionary chain of humans.

Those born or raised on the Moon or Mars, which are considered to be partial gravity environments, might fare better, but still might not be exactly the same as Earth-born people.

"Maybe the one-sixth gravity of the Moon, or the one-third gravity of Mars is sufficient for normal bone and muscle development," Lehnhardt said.

"That would lead to a similar species then spreading out amongst the solar system."

Explore further: After 9 months in space, mouse sperm yield healthy mice

Related Stories

Research uncovers potential health risks of travel to Mars

March 8, 2017

Sending a manned mission to Mars requires more than a powerful launch rocket. Prep work also includes learning how a three-year space flight could affect the human body. With funding from the National Aeronautics and Space ...

Moon tourists risk rough ride, experts say

March 1, 2017

Non-stop vomiting, a puffy face and the constant need to pee: Volunteers for a week-long loop around the Moon may be in for a rough ride even if all goes to plan.

Recommended for you

A new classification scheme for exoplanet sizes

September 24, 2018

There are about 4433 exoplanets in the latest catalogs. Their radii have generally been measured by knowing the radius of their host star and then closely fitting the lightcurves as the planet transits across the face of ...

First to red planet will become Martians: Canada astronaut

September 22, 2018

Astronauts traveling through space on the long trip to Mars will not have the usual backup from mission control on Earth and will need to think of themselves as Martians to survive, Canada's most famous spaceman half-jokingly ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rboling
not rated yet May 24, 2017
32 chicken embryos were launched on STS-29. Half were two days old, half were nine days old at launch. All the two-day old embryos died during the mission, all the nine-day old embryos survived. I don't recall if there was a definitive reason for the difference. Vibration? Radiation? Some of the surviving embryos were allowed to hatch, once back on earth, and were donated to zoos.

STS-108 carried 36 Japanese Quail embryos, all of the same age, I believe. Half were mounted on a carousel that did not rotate, the other half spun on a carousel providing 1 g (both in the same enclosure on the middeck of space shuttle Endeavour). I believe Drs. David Dickman and Stephen Doty may have published their findings from the experiment. They were looking at differences in bone and inner-ear development in embryos in microgravity vs. 1 g.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.