The LHC has restarted for its 2017 run

May 1, 2017
Final tests were performed in the LHC at the end of April, ready for the restart this weekend. Credit: Maximilien Brice/ CERN

Today, the LHC once again began circulating beams of protons, for the first time this year. This follows a 17-week-long extended technical stop.

Over the past month, after the completion of the that began in December 2016, each of the in the accelerator chain have, in turn, been switched on and checked until this weekend when the LHC, the final machine in the chain, could be restarted by the Operations team.

"It's like an orchestra, everything has to be timed and working very nicely together. Once each of the parts is working properly, that's when the beam goes in, in phases from one machine to the next all the way up to the LHC," explains Rende Steerenberg, who leads the operations group responsible for the whole accelerator complex, including the LHC.

Each year, the machines shut down over the winter break to enable technicians and engineers to perform essential repairs and upgrades, but this year the stop was scheduled to run longer, allowing more complex work to take place. This year included the replacement of a superconducting magnet in the LHC, the installation of a new beam dump in the Super Proton Synchrotron and a massive cable removal campaign.

Among other things, these upgrades will allow the collider to reach a higher integrated – the higher the luminosity, the more data the experiments can gather to allow them to observe rare processes.

"Our aim for 2017 is to reach an integrated luminosity of 45 fb-1 [they reached 40 fb-1 last year] and preferably go beyond. The big challenge is that, while you can increase luminosity in different ways – you can put more bunches in the machine, you can increase the intensity per bunch and you can also increase the density of the beam – the main factor is actually the amount of time you stay in stable beams," explains Steerenberg.

In 2016, the machine was able to run with stable beams – beams from which the researchers can collect data – for around 49 per cent of the time, compared to just 35 per cent the previous year. The challenge the team faces this year is to maintain this or (preferably) increase it further.

The team will also be using the 2017 run to test new optics settings – which provide the potential for even higher luminosity and more collisions.

"We're changing how we squeeze the beam to its small size in the experiments, initially to the same value as last year, but with the possibility to go to even smaller sizes later, which means we can push the limits of the machine further. With the new SPS dump and the improvements to the LHC injector kickers, we can inject more particles per bunch and more bunches, hence more collisions," he concludes.

For the first few weeks only, a few bunches of particles will be circulating in the LHC to debug and validate the machine. Bunches will gradually increase over the coming weeks until there are enough particles in the machine to begin collisions and to start collecting physics data.

Explore further: Return of the LHC – season 2 continues

Related Stories

Return of the LHC – season 2 continues

March 30, 2016

On Friday, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) opened its doors to allow particles to travel around the ring for the first time since the year-end technical stop (YETS) began in December 2015. At 10.30 am, a first bunch was circulating ...

Data harvest in the LHC

June 2, 2016

The intensity rises in the Large Hadron Collider. More and more protons are circulating pushing up the collision rate in the experiments to record highs.

The LHC takes a break before heading to new heights

July 29, 2016

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) has been on Olympic form recently. In just two months, the accelerator delivered almost five times as much data as in the whole of 2015, smashing one record after another for luminosity, i.e. ...

Large Hadron Collider progresses toward higher intensities

August 24, 2015

As with any particle accelerator designed to explore a new energy frontier, the operators at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) have to take the machine up to its full operating potential step by step. Following the start of ...

LHC performance reaches new highs

July 8, 2016

It's full speed ahead for the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), as it shatters its own records one after the other, achieving record luminosity, record numbers of bunches and a record beam lifespan.

Recommended for you

6 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

SkyLy
not rated yet May 05, 2017
CERN has already built a time machine, so why are they putting up a face ? Watch the Steins Gate documentary if you want to know more about it.
Dingbone
May 05, 2017
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (1) May 05, 2017
It looks like tiny black hole stuck in the wall..

That....makes no sense on so many levels.
snerdguy
not rated yet May 08, 2017
A black hole is black. So, obviously, that's red antimatter. You got to keep up with your Star Trek movies.

The statement, "That ...makes no sense on so many levels." is how they keep CERN funded. As long as the scientists can keep their fiscal providers baffled with BS and promises of magical outcomes, they will continue to pour money into it until something more exciting comes along. Then, the Save the Earth people can come in and raise funds to fill the hole in and condemn it as a mistake made by past generations. Humans are fascinating creatures.
antialias_physorg
not rated yet May 08, 2017
A black hole is black.

- A black hole of that size in that position would be white (because it would produce a really, really, Really enormous amount of radiation)...and would have fried the camera and the operator.

- A black hole of that size (several centimeters accross) would also have more than one g pull. So everything on Earth would feel the change of the 'down' direction quite noticeably (And the camera operator would fly towards it unless he's chained to the wall)

- A black hole that size would most definitely not remain stuck in a wall (or anywhere else). It would fall to the center of the Earth (or, more correctly: Since this thing'd be more massive than Earth the Earth would fall up until this thing was at its center after a couple hundred oscillations and a boatload of radiation)

- Anyone else want to continue? (Local effect of magnetic field of fast rotating black holes, etc. )
antialias_physorg
not rated yet May 08, 2017
The statement, "That ...makes no sense on so many levels." is how they keep CERN funded.

Ya know: Just because you don't have enough enducation to understand what they do doesn't mean everyone else is similarly limited.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.