Top lab CERN launches key new accelerator

May 9, 2017
Europe's top physics lab CERN has launched a new particle accelerator to connect to its Large Hadron Collider proton smasher, in an attempt to uncover new particles and prove the existence of extra space-time dimensions The Geneva lab has long voiced hope that an enhanced LHC may help uncover new particles, possibly proving the existence of extra space-time dimensions.

Europe's top physics lab CERN launched its newest particle accelerator on Tuesday, billed as a key step towards future experiments that could unlock the universe's greatest mysteries.

The Linac 4 accelerator will by 2021 be connected to CERN's Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the world's most powerful proton smasher.

The Geneva lab has long voiced hope that an enhanced LHC may help uncover new particles, possibly proving the existence of extra space-time dimensions.

The LHC has been connected to an accelerator launched in 1978, called the Linac 2.

The Linac 4 will deliver proton beams with three times more energy than its predecessor, with higher impact particle collisions ideally yielding new data, CERN said in a statement.

The new device "will considerably increase the potential of the LHC experiments" it added.

The 90-meter (295-foot) long Linac 4 took a decade to build and will be put through a series of test runs before being connected to the LHC.

Even with its older accelerator the LHC helped make extraordinary discoveries.

In 2012, it was used to prove the existence of the Higgs Boson—the long-sought maker of mass, also known as the God particle.

The Higgs fits within the so-called Standard Model—the mainstream theory of all the fundamental that make up matter and the forces that govern them.

CERN Director General Fabiola Gianotti has hailed the start of an "ambitious upgrade programme," dubbing the new Linac 4 accelerator a "remarkable accomplishment"

A future goal for the LHC is to explore anomalies in the Standard Model that could indicate new dimensions.

Those experiments could possibly help explain dark matter and dark energy, of which we have no understanding but which together make up 95 percent of the universe.

CERN is going to shut down its desire complex in 2019-2020 to enhance the system.

The Linac 4 is "the first key element of our ambitious upgrade programme", CERN chief Fabiola Gianotti said in a statement, hailing its launch as a "remarkable accomplishment".

Explore further: CERN celebrates completion of Linac 4

Related Stories

CERN celebrates completion of Linac 4

May 9, 2017

At a ceremony today, CERN inaugurated its linear accelerator, Linac 4, the newest accelerator acquisition since the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Linac 4 is due to feed the CERN accelerator complex with particle beams of higher ...

Linac 4 reached its energy goal

November 8, 2016

CERN's new linear accelerator (Linac 4) has now accelerated a beam up to its design energy, 160 MeV. This important milestone of the accelerator's commissioning phase took place on 25 October.

Maybe it wasn't the Higgs particle after all

November 7, 2014

Last year CERN announced the finding of a new elementary particle, the Higgs particle. But maybe it wasn't the Higgs particle, maybe it just looks like it. And maybe it is not alone.

Recommended for you

Improved thermal-shock resistance in industrial ceramics

August 21, 2018

Ceramic materials are used in nuclear, chemical and electrical power generation industries because of their ability to withstand extreme environments. However, at high temperatures, ceramics are susceptible to thermal-shock ...

12 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Hyperfuzzy
1 / 5 (1) May 09, 2017
However, the physics of the imagination cannot deny the existence of the diametrical spherical fields; however studied. Nor does it matter that the speed of light and the velocity of the wavelet, relative to you as a proper observer, the "cat" or the wavelet is measured by knowing the total motion of the wavelet, vectorially. Try that before thinking just because you are on a crest of a wave, this world does not change. It only changes, if you are not using logic, only an imagination. Charge, axiom: a spherical field, unchanging, updated relative to its center at the speed of light, the field extends from its center to infinity. So how do we feel it? juz say'n
Hyperfuzzy
May 09, 2017
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Hyperfuzzy
1 / 5 (1) May 09, 2017
Particles are Not necessary or sufficient to define what we are able to see and measure. We cannot deny air, water, substance, and what we see and feel is a tiny set of all the possible states within an infinite set of diametrical fields. Their existence allows us to see the shimmer, or color, or the wrinkle in their field. This exist and is undeniable. We know these traits, there are no others nor need there be. Tautology!
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (2) May 10, 2017
However, the physics of the imagination cannot deny the existence of the diametrical spherical fields

Since the only three results google turned up on "diametrical spherical field" are from posts by you - what's to deny?

Hint: just throwing random sciency sounding words together does not make you look smart. It makes you look exceptionally dumb, in fact.
Hyperfuzzy
1 / 5 (1) May 10, 2017
However, the physics of the imagination cannot deny the existence of the diametrical spherical fields

Since the only three results google turned up on "diametrical spherical field" are from posts by you - what's to deny?

Hint: just throwing random sciency sounding words together does not make you look smart. It makes you look exceptionally dumb, in fact.

You can Google my quotes? Any way, it's only a concept.

Hyperfuzzy
1 / 5 (1) May 10, 2017
Physics tries to define and measure. The imagination is for TV.

By the way, these "Post usher" removed my post that simply state's "Maxwell". Funny, the only thing of relevance is your system of measure, based upon Maxwell. Yeah, I can see that, remove anything relevant; but, allow exactly what I choose not to delete.
Hyperfuzzy
1 / 5 (1) May 10, 2017
Why can't we discriminate among good and bad concepts? Know how to disprove a theory. Any theory based upon false concepts or no concept, simply explore, simply because you can, is expensive even in a society that does not use money. It's without purpose and deletable. We can define everything within the stream and everything during collisions. Try running simulations with the same number of diametrical spherical fields, using a single polarity. Since polarity's namesake is arbitrary, run it twice, each polarity, multiple settings. We can do this all day. The results of multiple simulations using precise position and motion, get it? Complete traceability, ie. knowledge of what you are doing!
Hyperfuzzy
1 / 5 (1) May 10, 2017
OK, all I was saying, is to begin with the newly found knowledge of Maxwell, his was a tabulation, not definitive, no axiomatic structure; however, he did give us a source for Newton's field, what is it within mass that can produce such a field. I simply hang out with the "who" started it.
Hyperfuzzy
1 / 5 (1) May 10, 2017
At issue is our universal constants reference to the unknown field representation of mass. The Kg in epsilon. Our calculations are on the atomic scale. Therefore, the field strength is inversely proportional to the sphere created at that point by the point in question. This energy contains the vectorization of the charge's relative velocity. Note: the fields from each center is separable and superimposable, therefore we are only looking at initial conditions. If we define the time dimension as the space dimension as lambda of c = lambda nu; then c = 1. Therefore the time dimension is practically irrelevant, since each point at all times have a given set of attributes. You can see any collision in your head.
Hyperfuzzy
May 10, 2017
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
AmritSorli
not rated yet May 18, 2017
Higgs mechanism Inconveniences
https://www.resea...eniences
Hyperfuzzy
not rated yet May 18, 2017
Higgs mechanism Inconveniences
https://www.resea...eniences

OK, science based upon luck; no axiomatic structure; just whatever event pops up, if we can pop it up, under control and measurement within 5 sigma, we'll call it a touchdown.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.