Image: Hubble hones in on a hypergiant's home

March 10, 2017
This Hubble image reveals a young super star cluster known as Westerlund 1, only 15,000 light-years away in our Milky Way neighborhood, yet home to one of the largest stars ever discovered. Credit: ESA/Hubble & NASA

This beautiful Hubble image reveals a young super star cluster known as Westerlund 1, only 15,000 light-years away in our Milky Way neighborhood, yet home to one of the largest stars ever discovered.

Stars are classified according to their spectral type, surface temperature, and luminosity. While studying and classifying the cluster's constituent stars, astronomers discovered that Westerlund 1 is home to an enormous star. Originally named Westerlund 1-26, this monster star is a red supergiant (although sometimes classified as a hypergiant) with a radius over 1,500 times that of our sun. If Westerlund 1-26 were placed where our sun is in our solar system, it would extend out beyond the orbit of Jupiter.

Most of Westerlund 1's are thought to have formed in the same burst of activity, meaning that they have similar ages and compositions. The cluster is relatively young in astronomical terms —at around three million years old it is a baby compared to our own sun, which is some 4.6 billion years old.

Explore further: Chandra Lifts the Veil on Milky Way 'Hotspot'

Related Stories

Chandra Lifts the Veil on Milky Way 'Hotspot'

January 23, 2008

NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory is helping to demystify Westerlund 2, a young star cluster with an estimated age of about one- or two-million years. Heavily obscured by dust and gas, Westerlund 2 has been something of a ...

How the largest star known is tearing itself apart

October 16, 2013

(Phys.org) —An international team of astronomers has observed part of the final death throes of the largest known star in the universe as it throws off its outer layers. The discovery, by a collaboration of scientists from ...

Magnetar formation mystery solved?

May 14, 2014

Magnetars are the super-dense remnants of supernova explosions. They are the strongest magnets known in the Universe—millions of times more powerful than the strongest magnets on Earth. A team of astronomers using ESO's ...

Recommended for you

Jellyfish-shaped galaxy found in Abell 2670 cluster

April 24, 2017

(Phys.org)—Using the Multi Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE), astronomers have identified a new elliptical jellyfish-like galaxy in the Abell 2670 cluster. The newly detected galaxy showcases spectacular one-sided tails ...

A black hole in a low mass X-ray binary

April 24, 2017

A globular cluster is a roughly spherical ensemble of stars (as many as several million) that are gravitationally bound together, and typically located in the outer regions of galaxies. Low mass X-ray binary stars (LMXBs) ...

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

BENRAS
4 / 5 (4) Mar 11, 2017
The proper usage is "Homes", not "hones!"
RNP
1 / 5 (3) Mar 11, 2017
@BENRAS
Check your facts before you post. To hone is to sharpen.
geokstr
3.7 / 5 (3) Mar 12, 2017
@BENRAS
Check your facts before you post. To hone is to sharpen.


Maybe you should check the real facts before trying to criticize using your version of them.

http://blog.dicti...home-in/

They recommend never using "hone in" in place of "home in", although that mistake is often made. "Home in" means "to target with great accuracy" while "hone" means "to sharpen or perfect, as with a skill."
RNP
1 / 5 (1) Mar 12, 2017
@geokstr
This is a science site, not an English grammar site. "Hone in" is an often used, and clear, phrase that is defined in dictionaries. So, what is the point that you and BENRAS's are trying to make?
lengould100
5 / 5 (1) Mar 12, 2017
Improper use of "hone in" is really grating. Benras is right.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.