Study shows public wants researchers held accountable for data fraud

March 23, 2017, University at Albany
Study shows public wants researchers held accountable for data fraud
A new study by School of Criminal Justice researchers suggest the justice system is out of sync with the American public when it comes to prosecuting cases of research fraud. Credit: University at Albany

Whether it is falsification, fabrication or selective reporting, the general public views these research practices as immoral and believes scientists should be held accountable, according to a new study by researchers at the University at Albany.

The study, by School of Criminal Justice Assistant Professor Justin Pickett and graduate researcher Sean Patrick Roche, found that there is an extraordinary consensus among survey respondents that both falsifying or fabricating data and selective reporting are morally unacceptable.

"More than 90 percent of participants believe that scientists caught falsifying or fabricating data should be fired and banned from receiving ," said Pickett. "However, most participants also believe that selective reporting deserves these same sanctions."

The majority of respondents agreed that data fraud should be a criminal offense, while well over a third of participants hold the same view of selective reporting.

The paper, "Questionable, Objectionable or Criminal? Public Opinion on Data Fraud and Selective Reporting in Science," was published in the March 2017 edition of Science and Engineering Ethics. Pickett and Roche conducted two surveys to collect data, comprising 1,750 responses.

The findings suggest the justice system is out of sync with the American public when it comes to prosecuting cases of – where are exceedingly rare. In fact, it wasn't until the 2006 case of Eric Poehlman, a researcher in the field of obesity and aging, that a scientist in the United States was actually sentenced to jail time for academic fraud.

For Pickett and Roche, their findings suggest that although selective reporting is perceived as less egregious than falsifying or fabricating data, the public believes all of these behaviors are deserving of punishment.

"For instance, participants absolutely do not view selective reporting as a 'questionable research practice'; rather, the vast majority of laypersons in our sample believe this common behavior is morally reprehensible," said Pickett. "In fact, the results indicate that slightly over half of all Americans would prefer both to criminalize data fraud and to sentence fraudsters to a period of incarceration."

Understanding the broader implications of falsifying data remains a concern given the length of time from when a case is first reported to when a retraction is submitted. In the case of Poehlman, it took six years from the time objections were first raised and the scientist admitted to research .

Explore further: Online fraud and romance scam victims find reporting the crime just as traumatic

More information: Justin T. Pickett et al. Questionable, Objectionable or Criminal? Public Opinion on Data Fraud and Selective Reporting in Science, Science and Engineering Ethics (2017). DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9886-2

Related Stories

UK researcher sentenced to three months' jail for faking data

April 19, 2013

A British scientist convicted of scientific fraud last month for falsifying research data has been sentenced to three months jail. Steven Eaton is the first person to serve time under the UK's Good Laboratory Practice Regulations, ...

Researcher charged in major HIV vaccine fraud case

June 24, 2014

Responding to a major case of research misconduct, federal prosecutors are taking a rare step by charging a scientist with fraud after he admitted falsifying data while researching an HIV vaccine.

No publication bias found in climate change research

March 15, 2017

Rarely do we encounter a scientific fact that stirs public controversy and distrust in science as much as climate change. However, the theory is built on honest reporting of facts. This emerges from a new study from Lund ...

Recommended for you

Fat from 558 million years ago reveals earliest known animal

September 20, 2018

Scientists from The Australian National University (ANU) and overseas have discovered molecules of fat in an ancient fossil to reveal the earliest confirmed animal in the geological record that lived on Earth 558 million ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.