Research from the University of Bristol has developed new insights into how farmers treat their sheep for disease

January 31, 2017, University of Bristol
Research from the University of Bristol has developed new insights into how farmers treat their sheep for disease.
Credit: University of Bristol

Farmers who don't treat their sheep to avoid infection are often blamed for the national increase in disease. However an economic study, funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) has found that, in some scenarios, this is the most economically sensible decision to take.

Prior to 1992, throughout the UK were required by law to treat all their sheep to prevent , an infectious condition caused by the presence of a tiny parasitic mite. At that time there were only around 40 outbreaks per year. After compulsory treatment was removed, the number of scab outbreaks rose dramatically and there are now around 5,000 - 10,000 outbreaks each year. This costs the UK sheep industry at least £10 million every year.

The failure to reduce scab incidence, despite many industry initiatives, is often blamed on those farmers who are unwilling to use routine preventative treatments.

New research, published in the journal Preventive Veterinary Medicine by Emily Nixon and colleagues from the School of Biological Sciences, shows that many of these farmers are being blamed unfairly.

Information on the losses and treatment costs were analysed along with the risks of scab, to show whether it is financially better for a farmer to treat to prevent scab before any sheep are infected or whether it is worth running a risk, and only treating if the flock contracts scab.

Research from the University of Bristol has developed new insights into how farmers treat their sheep for disease.
A male Psoroptes ovis, the parasitic mite that causes sheep scab. Credit: University of Bristol

The analysis suggests that under current conditions, it is actually only cost-effective for farmers to use preventative treatments in areas where the scab risk is highest - Scotland, Northern England and Wales and where high risk grazing strategies (particularly common grazing) are used. For farmers in other areas, it is more cost-effective in the long run for them to only pay to treat if and when their flock gets scab.

Emily Nixon said: "Farmers will not treat preventatively when it is not in their economic interest to do so. To achieve national reductions in scab incidence, approaches that give farmers an economic incentive to use preventative treatment will need to be adopted."

These findings show that when it comes to disease control, there is not always one blanket strategy that works for all farmers; tailoring strategies to specific regions or farms can help to ensure that farmers do not lose out.

Explore further: Tailored solutions best for costly sheep infection

More information: Emily J. Nixon et al. Treatment strategies for sheep scab: An economic model of farmer behaviour, Preventive Veterinary Medicine (2017). DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.12.015

Related Stories

Tailored solutions best for costly sheep infection

November 21, 2011

You might not have heard of sheep scab. It's not a human health risk and there's no co-ordinated treatment programme. But it's unpleasant and potentially fatal to sheep, and it costs UK farmers around £8 million a year.

Farmers can spot lame sheep, but fail to prevent footrot spread

October 14, 2008

Sheep farmers are highly able to spot even mildly lame sheep, but many do not take steps to prevent the spread of lameness in their flocks by catching and treating these animals. A study in the open access journal BMC Veterinary ...

Recommended for you

Cells lacking nuclei struggle to move in 3-D environments

January 20, 2018

University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center researchers have revealed new details of how the physical properties of the nucleus influence how cells can move around different environments - such as ...

Microbial communities demonstrate high turnover

January 19, 2018

When Mark Twain famously said "If you don't like the weather in New England, just wait a few minutes," he probably didn't anticipate MIT researchers would apply his remark to their microbial research. But a new study does ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.