Rock samples suggest oxygen levels during 'Lomagundi Event' were high enough to support life development progress

January 17, 2017 by Bob Yirka, Phys.org report
This is a 1.9-billion-year-old stromatolite — or mound made by microbes that lived in shallow water — called the Gunflint Formation in northern Minnesota. The environment of the oxygen “overshoot” described in research by Michael Kipp, Eva Stüeken and Roger Buick may have included this sort of oxygen-rich setting that is suitable for complex life. Credit: Eva Stüeken

(Phys.org)—A small team of researchers in the U.S. has found evidence in rock samples that suggests that oxygen levels during the Lomagundi Event were high enough to support the advancement of life on Earth. In their paper published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the team describes how they analyzed rocks that had formed during the event period and in so doing found evidence of higher than expected oxygen levels.

Scientists believe that first emerged on planet Earth almost 4 billion years ago—but it took almost another 3 billion years for eukaryotes (a cell-based organism with ) to come about. But there is also evidence that the Earth experienced a time when oxygen levels rose, called the Lomagundi Event—it occurred approximately 2.3 to 2.1 billion years ago. Scientists would like to know whether the degree of oxygen enrichment during that time period was enough to support higher life form development, and if so, why eukaryotes didn't arise during that time instead of a billion years later.

To find out how much oxygen was in the atmosphere during the Lomagundi Event, the researchers collected rocks that had formed on the ocean floor during this period and ran tests that showed how much selenium they contained—it is released when rocks on land erode in the presence of oxygen and are carried to the sea by rivers, where selenium builds up in sea bottom rocks. Once on the sea bottom (in shallow areas), two selenium isotopes, 78 and 82 are metabolized by microbes and the ratios of each are determined by how much oxygen is in the water. Using all this information, the researchers were able to calculate that there would have been approximately 5 micromoles per liter of oxygen in the water during the Lomagundi Event—enough, they suggest, to support the development of life into something more complex.

To date, there has been little evidence that such a development occurred, but of course, as the researchers note, that doesn't mean it didn't happen. It is possible that life got a start then, was set back as atmospheric mysteriously dropped, and left behind little to show it had been there.

Explore further: Humble moss helped create our oxygen-rich atmosphere

More information: Selenium isotopes record extensive marine suboxia during the Great Oxidation Event, PNAS, www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1615867114

Abstract
It has been proposed that an "oxygen overshoot" occurred during the early Paleoproterozoic Great Oxidation Event (GOE) in association with the extreme positive carbon isotopic excursion known as the Lomagundi Event. Moreover, it has also been suggested that environmental oxygen levels then crashed to very low levels during the subsequent extremely negative Shunga–Francevillian carbon isotopic anomaly. These redox fluctuations could have profoundly influenced the course of eukaryotic evolution, as eukaryotes have several metabolic processes that are obligately aerobic. Here we investigate the magnitude of these proposed oxygen perturbations using selenium (Se) geochemistry, which is sensitive to redox transitions across suboxic conditions. We find that δ82/78Se values in offshore shales show a positive excursion from 2.32 Ga until 2.1 Ga (mean +1.03 ± 0.67‰). Selenium abundances and Se/TOC (total organic carbon) ratios similarly show a peak during this interval. Together these data suggest that during the GOE there was pervasive suboxia in near-shore environments, allowing nonquantitative Se reduction to drive the residual Se oxyanions isotopically heavy. This implies O2 levels of >0.4 μM in these settings. Unlike in the late Neoproterozoic and Phanerozoic, when negative δ82/78Se values are observed in offshore environments, only a single formation, evidently the shallowest, shows evidence of negative δ82/78Se. This suggests that there was no upwelling of Se oxyanions from an oxic deep-ocean reservoir, which is consistent with previous estimates that the deep ocean remained anoxic throughout the GOE. The abrupt decline in δ82/78Se and Se/TOC values during the subsequent Shunga–Francevillian anomaly indicates a widespread decrease in surface oxygenation.

Press release

Related Stories

Humble moss helped create our oxygen-rich atmosphere

August 15, 2016

The evolution of the first land plants including mosses may explain a long-standing mystery of how Earth's atmosphere became enriched with oxygen, according to an international study led by the University of Exeter.

Recommended for you

Maximizing the environmental benefits of autonomous vehicles

February 15, 2018

The added weight, electricity demand and aerodynamic drag of the sensors and computers used in autonomous vehicles are significant contributors to their lifetime energy use and greenhouse gas emissions, according to a new ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

MadScientist72
3 / 5 (4) Jan 17, 2017
Scientists believe that life first emerged on planet Earth almost 4 billion years ago—but it took almost another 3 billion years for eukaryotes (a cell-based organism with genetic material) to come about.

Prokaryotes (bacteria & archaea) are also "cell-based organism[s] with genetic material". The defining difference is that eukaryotes keep their genetic material in a membrane-enclosed nucleus.
elisevil
1 / 5 (2) Jan 18, 2017
I might question the biases of scientists who must look only for the development of themselves as a sign of evolution. Our history's best scientists were those that were able to see what was when it was contrary to the 'me first' egotistical bias we all share. As one of those greats (Darwin) found, evolution is NOT directional towards complexity, much less towards humans. If we need ego to find interest, simply knowing that we were once 'simple' prokaryotes should allow us to find extra wonder in their own evolutionary lifestyles. Evolution does not even have to change a successful organism's phenotype. Just look at our little changing crocodiliformes.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.