Why we may be closer to breaching global warming targets than we thought

Why we may be closer to breaching global warming targets than we thought
Credit: University of Reading

Global temperature rise may be closer to the limit recently imposed by world leaders than previously thought, new research has revealed.

A study led by scientists at the University of Reading has aimed to provide an improved definition of the 'pre-industrial' period to put the targets set at the UN Paris Agreement into context.

Global leaders agreed to avoid a temperature rise of more than 2°C – and ideally no more than 1.5°C – as they debated climate change measures in Paris. However, the 'pre-industrial' starting point from which to measure the rise has never been clearly defined.

The new study, published in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (BAMS), has concluded that global temperatures were more than 1°C warmer than pre-industrial times in both 2015 and 2016, and that limits on future emissions may have to be tightened slightly to avoid breaching the agreed temperature targets.

Dr Ed Hawkins, from the University of Reading's Department of Meteorology, said: "Setting greenhouse gas emission targets was a crucial step towards halting the temperature rise seen in recent decades. However, a specific 'starting line' for the temperature rise is needed to better track progress and define how future emissions would need to change to avoid breaching the agreed temperature limits.

"By the second half of the 19th century – the period currently used as a starting point – there had likely already been some temperature rise, meaning that emissions targets may need to be refined if we are to stay below the 1.5°C or 2°C thresholds."

Since the invention of an efficient steam engine in 1784, humans have been using fossil fuels to power industrial processes, which also release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and contribute to global warming. But to better understand the Paris Agreement targets, a suitable starting point for when humans began to influence global temperatures needs to be selected.

However, choosing this starting point is complicated by climatic changes due to natural factors such as the sun and volcanic activity. The authors argue that the years 1720-1800 are a better 'pre-industrial' period than the currently used 1850-1900 period.

They studied existing long-term temperature records for central England, the Netherlands and Europe, as well as changes in other factors such as greenhouse gases and concluded that temperatures likely increased by more than 0.6°C from pre-industrial up until the 1986-2005 period. Further warming since then took to at least 1°C above the pre-industrial era for the first time in 2015, with the global temperature in 2016 being more than 1.1°C above pre-industrial levels.

Professor Tim Osborn, from the University of East Anglia and a co-author of the study, said: "The international community have agreed to policies measured against a poorly defined and poorly known 'pre-industrial' climate. We have used current scientific understanding and data to get a better handle on what this baseline climate was, and an improved estimate of how much warming has already occurred since the 'pre-industrial' period.

"Nevertheless, the uncertainties in our estimate could be reduced by more efforts to digitise weather observations recorded in ship logbooks in the 18th and early 19th centuries."

Explore further

Report reassesses variations in global warming

More information: Volunteers willing to help gather further data to clarify global temperatures in the pre-industrial period defined by the research team should visit www.oldweather.org/

Ed Hawkins et al. Estimating changes in global temperature since the pre-industrial period, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (2017). DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0007.1

Citation: Why we may be closer to breaching global warming targets than we thought (2017, January 26) retrieved 3 April 2020 from https://phys.org/news/2017-01-closer-breaching-global-thought.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments