Colombia plane crash—how can people survive deadly air disasters?

November 30, 2016 by Graham Braithwaite, The Conversation
Work out where your nearest exit is.

A plane crash in Colombia has killed at least 75 people including most of one of Brazil's top football teams, leaving just six survivors. While the investigation may take some time to reveal the factors behind the accident, the distressingly high – but not total – number of fatalities raises the question of how some people are able to survive such a devastating disaster.

Aircraft accidents, especially those involving , are increasingly rare. According to the International Air Transport Association, 2015 saw one accident for every 3.1m flights. That's a spectacular achievement for an industry that is not much more than a century old and which involves transporting people at such high speeds in what can be challenging environments. But when an accident does occur, what is it that determines that some survive when many others on the same flight do not?

The first factor is whether an accident is deemed "survivable" at all. While it may seem like a simple definition, there are actually "unsurvivable" accidents where people beat the odds. Unsurvivable accidents tend to be those where there is either a catastrophic loss of control or where the impact is at high velocity.

Time to act

The Air France that crashed into the Atlantic in 2009 was a "loss of control in flight" accident which no one could have survived because of the heavy impact with the sea. In contrast, while the loss of all hydraulic systems aboard a United Airlines DC10 in 1989 should have resulted in the total loss of the aircraft, the heroic actions of the crew to steer the aircraft using only the thrust of the engines led to 185 survivors out of the 296 on board.

Accidents that happen in the cruise phase of flight, such as those involving a "controlled flight into terrain" tend to be less survivable. Such accidents happen without the crew being aware of a problem, so occur at high speed and without the cabin or its passengers being prepared for an accident. In these cases, survivors tend to be rare and the reasons behind their survival can be as random as whether they were thrown clear or were perhaps caught by a tree.

This was the case when there were only four of a 1985 accident involving a JAL Boeing 747, which killed 520 other people when the plane hit a mountainside following the separation of the aircraft's tail.

The European Transport Safety Council estimates that 90% of aircraft accidents are survivable – something that does not necessarily match public expectation. Such a high rate of survival is due to improvements in crashworthiness (the science of making structures better able to cope with impact), the cabin environment, and crew training.

The materials we use now are less flammable. The seats better able to withstand impact forces. The exit routes are more clearly marked. The fire suppression systems are more effective and the space around exits is better designed to allow the fast flow of evacuating passengers. Each of these developments has been based on the investigation of previous accidents and the actions of safety regulators and manufacturers to improve standards.

Seatbelts, brace, exits

Yet the factors that affect survivability are many and varied. In accidents where a problem has been identified beforehand, the use of seatbelts, fastened tight and low, along with adopting a suitable brace position, is known to have a tangible effect on whether you survive. Those who listen to the safety announcement and who take notice of their nearest exit – for example, by counting the rows of seats in front or behind them – are more likely to get off an aircraft that is on fire or filled with smoke.

Their chances are also increased by clear, assertive instructions by the cabin crew – safety is the main reason they are there after all. Sitting close to an exit also helps, although those who do sit here need to be ready to act swiftly to avoid being crushed by fellow passengers trying to reach the exit.

External factors help, too. There are strict planning rules around airports to remove obstacles and to ensure that the airport fire service can reach any part of an aerodrome within three minutes of an accident. This has helped to greatly increase the number of survivors who may once have survived the impact but not a subsequent fire because they could not evacuate from the aircraft.

Above all, passengers should remain vigilant. According to Boeing, between 2006 and 2015, 66% of fatal aircraft accidents occurred as the aircraft was on the ground – during take-off or during final approach and landing. It is worth keeping your shoes on and wearing suitable clothing. Use the time to listen to the cabin crew's briefing. The most likely result is that they will reward you with more attentive service, but if something does go wrong, it may well make all the difference – and even save your life.

Explore further: Why a detachable cabin probably won't save your life in a plane crash

Related Stories

Emirates jet crashed as gear went up for 2nd landing attempt

September 6, 2016

The pilot in last month's Emirates airliner crash landing in Dubai tried to take off again after a brief touchdown and had already begun raising the landing gear when the plane ultimately hit the ground, according to preliminary ...

Recommended for you

What can snakes teach us about engineering friction?

May 21, 2018

If you want to know how to make a sneaker with better traction, just ask a snake. That's the theory driving the research of Hisham Abdel-Aal, Ph.D., an associate teaching professor from Drexel University's College of Engineering ...

Flexible, highly efficient multimodal energy harvesting

May 21, 2018

A 10-fold increase in the ability to harvest mechanical and thermal energy over standard piezoelectric composites may be possible using a piezoelectric ceramic foam supported by a flexible polymer support, according to Penn ...

Self-assembling 3-D battery would charge in seconds

May 17, 2018

The world is a big place, but it's gotten smaller with the advent of technologies that put people from across the globe in the palm of one's hand. And as the world has shrunk, it has also demanded that things happen ever ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Dec 08, 2016
Why pitch aircraft safety? Do you have shares in some airlines?
Somewhat more relevant is how many near accidents occur (this might give an indication on how much more deadly crashes we can expect), or how many accident could have been avoided.
Aircraft without ejection seats for passengers is criminal in my opinion, next best could be rapid inflatable jackets similar to snow rescue balloons, next next best would be parachutes.
Another would be an actual forward radar, its criminal that passengers planes lack this and other bad weather and night vision capabilities. It's a very common cause of accidents, hitting a mountain ...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.