Is replacing coal with natural gas actually good for the climate?

November 7, 2016 by Adam Dove
Credit: Grant Wilson/public domain

Just ten years ago, around half of all electricity generation in the U.S. was powered by coal. Today, that number has dropped to one third. Over that same time period, electricity generation powered by natural gas has jumped from around 20% to 33%. This trend is expected to continue, with natural gas becoming the primary way that Americans get their electricity. And while we know that natural gas emits less carbon dioxide than coal, that doesn't mean that other emissions related to the production natural gas, such as methane, aren't just as damaging to the environment. In fact, a large body of work over the last 5 years highlights that natural gas' methane emissions can limit the climate benefits replacing coal with natural gas.

To add to the understanding of whether or not natural gas really is better for the environment than , researchers from Carnegie Mellon University's department of Engineering and Public Policy have conducted a new evaluation of natural gas' methane emissions and the comparative climate benefits of using natural gas instead of coal for electricity generation.

"The results indicate that new natural gas combined cycle plants could have lower climate impacts than new coal plants, as long as methane leakage rates are not extremely high," says EPP Ph.D. student DeVynne Farquharson, the paper's lead author.

Farquharson, along with co-authors EPP's Associate Professor Paulina Jaramillo, Research Scientist Kelly Klima, and Post-doctoral Fellow Derrick Carlson, and CEE's Assistant Professor Constantine Samaras and Ph.D. student Greg Schivley, modeled the life cycle of carbon dioxide and methane emissions from a new pulverized coal plant, a new natural gas combined cycle plant, and a new ultra-supercritical pulverized coal plant, with and without carbon capture sequestration (CCS). Using this model, the team measured the climate impacts of each over a 100-year span, while also evaluating the effects of a variety of methane leakage rates, ranging from 1% to 5% of natural gas produced.

While previous studies have been conducted on the pros and cons of natural gas, "Beyond global warming potential: a comparative application of climate impact metrics for the life cycle assessment of coal and natural gas based electricity," published in the August issue of the Journal of Industrial Ecology, differs from previous work in that it uses four different climate metrics in its evaluation of coal and natural gas emissions: global warming potential, cumulative radiative forcing, technology warming potential, and global temperature change potential.

"Without CCS, all metrics indicate that natural gas combined cycle plants with methane leakage rates below 8.5% have a lower climate impact than pulverized coal plants or ultra-supercritical pulverized coal plants over 100 years," Farquharson explains. "However, with the inclusion of CCS, pulverized coal plants and ultra-supercritical pulverized coal plants would have lower climate impacts than natural gas plants with CCS if methane leakage rates exceed 2% of the natural gas the plant uses."

But just because natural gas isn't as bad as coal, that doesn't make it "good."

"Our results suggest that a new natural gas plant would likely have lower climate impacts that a new coal plant, even after we account for methane leakage from the natural gas sector," says Farquharson. "However, deep decarburization of the power sector would likely require a radical shift from fossil fuels, including natural gas."

It's coal vs. natural gas in the fight for "Least Negative Impact" on the climate.

Explore further: Research finds long term effect of natural gas leakage

More information: Farquharson, D., Jaramillo, P., Schivley, G., Klima, K., Carlson, D. and Samaras, C. (2016), Beyond Global Warming Potential: A Comparative Application of Climate Impact Metrics for the Life Cycle Assessment of Coal and Natural Gas Based Electricity. Journal of Industrial Ecology. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12475

Related Stories

Research finds long term effect of natural gas leakage

December 2, 2015

As natural gas production increases around the nation, new research from the University of Colorado Denver shows that it can have a similar impact on climate change as coal if it's allowed to leak while producing electricity.

Is natural gas a 'bridge' to a hotter future?

December 8, 2014

Natural gas power plants produce substantial amounts of gases that lead to global warming. Replacing old coal-fired power plants with new natural gas plants could cause climate damage to increase over the next decades, unless ...

Replacing coal with natural gas would reduce warming: study

July 18, 2012

A debate has raged in the past couple of years as to whether natural gas is better or worse overall than coal and oil from a global warming perspective. The back- and-forth findings have been due to the timelines taken into ...

Recommended for you

East Antarctic Ice Sheet has history of instability

December 13, 2017

The East Antarctic Ice Sheet locks away enough water to raise sea level an estimated 53 meters (174 feet), more than any other ice sheet on the planet. It's also thought to be among the most stable, not gaining or losing ...

Hydraulic fracturing negatively impacts infant health

December 13, 2017

From North Dakota to Ohio to Pennsylvania, hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking, has transformed small towns into energy powerhouses. While some see the new energy boom as benefiting the local economy and decreasing ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

JamesG
1 / 5 (1) Nov 08, 2016
Hope the Democrats get voted out today or we may all be riding bikes to work and if you fart on the way you'll get fined.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.