Top brands failing on cotton sustainability

Top brands failing on cotton sustainability

The majority of international companies using most cotton globally are failing to deliver on cotton sustainability according to new independent research published today by Pesticide Action Network (PAN) UK, Solidaridad and WWF.

Just eight companies out of 37 made it out of the red zone in the ranking research conducted by Rank a Brand, one of Europe's largest brand-comparison sites on sustainability and . Only home furnishing giant IKEA, who top the ranking, score in the green zone with 12 out of a maximum of 19.5 points. C&A (9), H&M (9) and Adidas (7.75) follow in the yellow zone, while Nike (6.75), M&S (5.5), VF Corporation (3.25), and Kering (3) are in the orange zone. Another 29 companies fall in the red zone and appear to do virtually nothing on sustainability.

"IKEA, C&A and H&M are showing how cotton sustainability is good for business but many top companies are failing to deliver", said Richard Holland, Director, Market Transformation, WWF. "Sourcing more sustainable cotton has never been easier so there is no excuse for companies not to offer more responsible products to customers."

"It's clear that just a few leading companies are doing the heavy lifting on sourcing sustainable cotton", said Isabelle Roger, Global Cotton Programme Manager, Solidaridad. "For the cotton sector as a whole to become sustainable, all other major companies will need to get on board."

Top brands failing on cotton sustainability
WWF-Solidaridad-PAN UK Cotton Ranking Report 2016 . Credit: WWF

While around 10-13 per cent of global cotton supply can be classed as more sustainable, less than a fifth of this amount is actually being used as more sustainable cotton in products with the rest being sold as conventional due to lack of demand from top brands and companies.

"Lack of uptake of more sustainable cotton is a massive missed opportunity", said Keith Tyrell, Director, PAN UK. "Conventional cotton production often suffers from serious social and environmental impacts such as excessive water and hazardous pesticide use. Growing the sustainable cotton market is our best chance of cleaning up cotton and protecting worker health."

Rank a Brand scored performance across three areas: policy, sourcing and use, and traceability. Most points were available for sourcing and use with companies assessed according to volumes used from Better Cotton, Cotton made in Africa, Organic, and Fairtrade – the four standards judged to be sustainable for this research.

PAN UK, Solidaridad and WWF are calling on all companies using large volumes of cotton to set, report and deliver on time-bound targets for cotton sustainability – companies serious about sustainability should be sourcing 100% more sustainable cotton by 2020 at the latest.

  • Top brands failing on cotton sustainability
    Sustainable Cotton Production. Credit: Mind The Gap Report
  • Top brands failing on cotton sustainability
    Uptake of Sustainable Cotton. Credit: Mind The Gap Report

Explore further

Consumers willing to buy sustainable US cotton, researchers find

More information: Cotton Ranking report: awsassets.panda.org/downloads/ … rt___june_2016_2.pdf
Provided by WWF
Citation: Top brands failing on cotton sustainability (2016, June 7) retrieved 20 September 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2016-06-brands-cotton-sustainability.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
13 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more