Microsoft suit is latest tech clash with US over privacy

Microsoft suit is latest tech clash with US over privacy
This Tuesday, April 12, 2016 file photo shows the Microsoft logo in Issy- les-Moulineaux, outside Paris, France. Microsoft opened a new front in the battle over digital privacy this week, suing the Justice Department on Thursday, April 14, 2016, over its use of court orders requiring the company to turn over customer files stored in its computer centers often without notifying the customer involved. (AP Photo/Michel Euler, File)

As we live more of our lives online, the companies we trust with our digital secrets are increasingly clashing with authorities who want access to the messages, pictures, financial records and other data we accumulate in electronic form.

Microsoft opened a new front in the battle over digital privacy this week, suing the Justice Department over its use of court orders requiring the company to turn over customer files stored in its computer centers—often without notifying the customer involved.

It's the latest in a series of legal challenges brought by Microsoft and some of its leading competitors. Apple recently fought a high-profile battle over the FBI's demand for help unlocking an encrypted iPhone in San Bernardino, California, and it's continuing to challenge similar demands in other cases.

Other companies, including Google, Facebook and Yahoo, have increased their use of encryption. They've also sued for the right to report how often authorities demand under national security laws, after former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden leaked details of government data-gathering efforts.

Privacy advocates have applauded those moves, while authorities complain they could stymie legitimate investigations. But those legal maneuvers may benefit the companies as well as their customers. In the wake of Snowden's revelations and high-profile hacking attacks, tech firms want to reassure customers their information is safe.

"Privacy is an economic good at this point," said Jennifer Daskal, a former Justice Department attorney who now teaches law at American University in Washington, D.C. "It's good for business because consumers care about it. So the companies are competing over being privacy protective."

Many tech companies make money directly from customer information, of course, by selling advertising targeted to their users' interests and behavior. While some have criticized those practices, others note that's different from handing over information to authorities who have the power to put people in jail.

In the latest case, Microsoft Corp. says the U.S. Justice Department is using a decades-old law to obtain court orders for customers' data, while in some cases prohibiting the company from notifying the customer. Microsoft says those "non-disclosure" orders violate its constitutional right to free speech, as well as its customers' protection against unreasonable searches.

Microsoft suit is latest tech clash with US over privacy
This July 3, 2014, file photo, shows the Microsoft Corp. logo outside the Microsoft Visitor Center in Redmond, Wash. In a lawsuit filed Thursday, April 14, 2016, Microsoft is suing the U.S. government over a federal law that lets authorities examine its customers' email or online files without the customers' knowledge. The lawsuit comes as the tech industry is increasingly butting heads with U.S. officials over customers' privacy rights. (AP Photo Ted S. Warren, File)

Microsoft is also fighting a court battle in New York over the government's demand for emails of a non-U.S. citizen that the company has stored in a data center located in Ireland. Microsoft President Brad Smith has argued the case could open the door to other governments demanding information stored in the United States.

As people and businesses store more information on their electronic gadgets, or online in corporate data centers, "these companies are increasingly the intermediary between the government and our own privacy," said Daskal.

One former federal official was critical of Microsoft's latest lawsuit. Daniel "D.J." Rosenthal, a former Justice Department lawyer, said it could lead to warning "child molesters, domestic abusers, violent criminals and terrorists that they're being investigated."

But authorities are required to disclose most search warrants for information stored in filing cabinets, safes or other physical locations, as Microsoft notes in its lawsuit. With more people storing data online, the company contends the government is exploiting that trend "as a means of expanding its power to conduct secret investigations."

The company understands the need for secrecy in some cases, Smith added in a statement. "But based on the many secrecy orders we have received, we question whether these orders are grounded in specific facts that truly demand secrecy. To the contrary, it appears that the issuance of secrecy orders has become too routine."

Microsoft's business customers "regularly convey to us their strong desire to know when the government is obtaining their data," Smith said, while adding that individual customers should have the same right.

The Redmond, Washington-based company says authorities used the 1986 law, known as the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, to demand customer information more than 5,600 times in the last 18 months. In nearly half those cases, a court ordered the company to keep the demand secret and, in about 1,750 cases, those gag orders were indefinite.

In recent years, the tech industry and civil liberties groups have pressed Congress to reform several aspects of the law, which they say is outdated, but previous attempts have stalled.

"Hopefully this litigation will either produce a ruling or it will spur Congress to act," said Neil Richards, a law professor at Washington University in St. Louis.

Microsoft's move was also praised by Aaron Levie, the CEO of online data storage company Box. In a statement, Levie said his company has been expanding its encrypted storage services to "give customers more control over their data."

Levie added: "We also fully support Microsoft's effort to require more transparency in government data requests and the government's full observance of the protections guaranteed by the First and Fourth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution."


Explore further

Microsoft sues US over secret demands for customer data

© 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

Citation: Microsoft suit is latest tech clash with US over privacy (2016, April 15) retrieved 23 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2016-04-microsoft-latest-tech-clash-privacy.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
421 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Apr 15, 2016
When you are suspected of being involved in illegal activity, you bank account, you medical history, your car GPS, your internet history all of it is available to law enforcement agencies. So why do people think their phones should be exempt?

Apr 15, 2016
Great whitewashing from Microsoft, since they're already collecting undisclosed amount of undisclosed information from and about their users for undisclosed purposes.

There should be a law that says they -can't- use encryption for sending their "telemetrics" back home, so that everyone can see the data they're collecting. That way if they're collecting something that breaches your privacy, the users know of it and can avoid the product before the damage gets done, which means Microsoft and other sofware companies would have to avoid collecting such information in the first place.

That would also apply to Google or Facebook snooping around setting "anonymized" tracking cookies and call-home beacons in every piece of software and service they have anything to do with. If the information is so sensitive as to need encryption to transmit, you should not be transmitting it without explicit and confirmed permission.


Apr 15, 2016
"the companies we trust with our digital secrets" scare quotes

Apr 15, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Apr 15, 2016
Do not trust Big Brother.

Remember when he sent us into Iraq?

Remember when he kidnapped Jose Padilla and kept him in isolation for weeks with no rights whatever?

Think of the politician you trust the least and imagine them with that power over you.

Apr 15, 2016
Open source is the way to go. You can see what's there, you can change what you don't like. Windows, you've got a black box with a pipeline directly to the NSA, No Thanks!

Apr 15, 2016
You know the U.S. economy is in tip-top shape when it's citizens are worried about their personal data collection. Other countries are worried about war and invasions and we are worried about third-hand data collection of our email and browser history. 318.9 million people in the U.S. all clicking buttons sharing useless information. This should be very low on the priority scale.

Apr 15, 2016
Do not trust Big Brother.
Start practicing what you preach, VietPet

Apr 15, 2016
Koch-evnic, the oil-loving Rooskie likes his Pootie, the Russian Man. He has pictures of him all over his dacha, bare-chested on horseback, or riding a ostritch or showing how handsome he is, . . naturally.

That pootie-poot, he is such a card! Too bad they found all that money he stole.

Apr 16, 2016
Open source is the way to go. You can see what's there, you can change what you don't like


So can everyone else, which makes you more vulnerable.

For the regular folk who can't program their own kernel patches or debug software, it's better to use a black box, so the criminals at least have some difficulty in figuring out how to break in.

The problem with open source software is that it's more likely a bug will be found by motivated criminals than their victims, and the victims are reduced to simply reacting to problems after they've become problems, and usually they have to depend on third parties to actually do something. In practice it's no better than proprietary software.

With free access to the source code, anyone can poke around and find holes, and then not tell anyone about them. With black box software, at least this process is significantly slower and more difficult, and you have the company to take responsibility for fixing the hole.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more