In debate over encryption, Obama says 'dangers are real' (Update)

March 11, 2016 by Darlene Superville
In debate over encryption, Obama says 'dangers are real'
President Barack Obama gestures as he speaks at the South by Southwest Festival (SXSW), Friday, March 11, 2016, at the Center for Performing Arts in Austin, Texas. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

President Barack Obama is siding with law enforcement in the debate pitting encryption and personal privacy against national security, arguing that authorities must be able to access data held on electronic devices because the "dangers are real."

Appearing Friday at an annual tech festival in the Texas capital, Obama delivered his most extensive comments to date on an issue currently being played out in federal court. Apple, one of the world's largest technology companies, is challenging the government's request that it help the FBI access data on a cellphone that was used in the San Bernardino, California, attack that killed 14 people.

The issue has roiled the tech industry and divided Obama's advisers, but the president appeared to side with law enforcement despite also saying the matter would not be settled by adopting an "absolutist view."

Obama restated his commitment to strong encryption but also raised the question of how would authorities catch child pornographers or disrupt terrorist plots if smartphones and other electronic devices are designed in ways that keep the data on them locked away forever.

"My conclusion so far is that you cannot take an absolutist view on this," Obama said. "So if your argument is strong encryption, no matter what, and we can and should, in fact, create black boxes, then that I think does not strike the kind of balance that we have lived with for 200, 300 years.

In debate over encryption, Obama says 'dangers are real'
President Barack Obama waves to the audience after taking part in a South by Southwest Interactive, Friday, March 11, 2016, in Austin, Texas. (AP Photo/Eric Gay)

"And it's fetishizing our phones above every other value. And that can't be the right answer," he said.

At the end of a nearly hourlong, question-and-answer session with Evan Smith, CEO and editor in chief of The Texas Tribune, Smith asked the president "where do you come down" on the privacy versus security debate. He was not asked to comment on specifics of the dispute with Apple.

Obama said government shouldn't be able to "just willy nilly" access smartphones that are full of very personal data. But at the same time, while asserting that he's "way on the civil liberties side," Obama said "there has to be some concession" to be able to get the information in certain cases.

In debate over encryption, Obama says 'dangers are real'
President Barack Obama, center, waves to members of the audience after answering question from Evan Smith, left, CEO / Editor in Chief of The Texas Tribune, at the South by Southwest Festival (SXSW) at the Center for Performing Arts in Austin, Texas, Friday, March 11, 2016. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

"I am not interested in overthrowing the values that have made us an exceptional and great nation simply for expediency," Obama added. "But the dangers are real. Maintaining law and order and a civilized society is important. Protecting our kids is important."

Apple and the federal government are embroiled in a legal fight over Apple's refusal to help the FBI access the iPhone used in San Bernardino. The FBI has been unable on its own to unlock the phone and wants Apple to create a program specifically for that phone to help the bureau get to the data on it. But Apple has refused, and says that to do what the government is asking would set a terrible precedent.

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., who has sharply questioned FBI Director James Comey during congressional hearings on the matter, released a statement in which he said Obama's comments showed his "fundamental lack of understanding of the tech community, the complexities of encryption and the importance of privacy to our safety in an increasingly digital world."

In debate over encryption, Obama says 'dangers are real'
President Barack Obama places his taco order with Torchy's Tacos owner Aaron Sego, right, during an unannounced stop at Torchy's Tacos, Friday, March 11, 2016, in Austin, Texas. Obama traveled to Austin, to speak at South by Southwest Festival (SXSW) and attend two Democratic National Committee fundraisers. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

Issa said the solution, or key, that the government wants Apple to create could eventually compromised.

"There's just no way to create a special key for government that couldn't also be taken advantage of by the Russians, the Chinese or others who want access to the sensitive information we all carry in our pockets every day," Issa said.

Obama used his appearance at the decades-old festival to encourage the audience of tech enthusiasts to step forward and use their skills and imagination to "tackle big problems in new ways." He said the administration already is using technology to make people's lives better, and cited as an example the streamlining of federal applications. Offering up a problem in need of a solution, he urged industry leaders and entrepreneurs to use technology to help increase voter participation.

"The reason I'm here, really, is to recruit all of you. It's to say to you, as I'm about to leave office, how can we start coming up with new platforms and new ideas, new approaches across disciplines and across skill sets, to solve some of the big problems that we're facing today."

South by Southwest Interactive is part of South by Southwest, a movie, music and interactive media festival that has been held in Austin for the past 30 years. Obama's appearance was the first at the festival by a sitting U.S. president.

Explore further: Q&A: A look at the Apple vs US Justice Dept. court fight

Related Stories

Q&A: A look at the Apple vs US Justice Dept. court fight

February 17, 2016

A U.S. magistrate judge has ordered Apple to help the FBI break into a work-issued iPhone used by a gunman in the mass shooting in San Bernardino, California. Apple chief executive Tim Cook immediately objected, setting the ...

French interior minister backs FBI in Apple battle

March 11, 2016

French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve voiced support Friday for President Barack Obama's administration in its efforts to get Apple to unlock the iPhone of one of the San Bernardino attackers.

US lawmakers call Apple, FBI to encryption hearing

February 25, 2016

US lawmakers Thursday called a hearing next week on encryption, saying they hope to craft "a solution" to the standoff between Apple and law enforcement over accessing locked devices.

US appeals ruling on accessing data in New York iPhone case

March 8, 2016

Calling a New York judge's ruling "an unprecedented limitation" on judicial authority, the Justice Department has asked a Brooklyn federal court to reverse a decision that said Apple Inc. wasn't required to pry open a locked ...

Recommended for you

Wireless power could enable ingestible electronics

April 27, 2017

Researchers at MIT, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory have devised a way to wirelessly power small electronic devices that can linger in the digestive tract indefinitely after being swallowed. ...

New design tool to enable global roaming smart phones

April 26, 2017

Wireless communications is a technology that is used every day. Across society, there is a move away from using the internet on desktop computers and towards smartphones, tablets and laptops. Engineers at the University of ...

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shootist
1 / 5 (4) Mar 12, 2016
You all voted for this fascist. What are you going to do about it?
ogg_ogg
2.3 / 5 (3) Mar 12, 2016
Obama comes down of the side of Big Brother, what a surprize.
jackjump
2.3 / 5 (3) Mar 12, 2016
Apple makes it hard for the government to obtain data off of an iPhone but they can do it with a little bit of trouble and maybe ruining the iPhone:

http://arstechnic...t-lying/

That's not good enough for them, they want a backdoor so they can walk in and read it . . . along with everyone else's iPhone.

It was King George's insistence that everyone's persons, houses, papers and effects be available for inspection that gave us the 4th of the ten items in the Bill of Rights (first ten amendments to the Constitution) protecting us from such searches. Is King Obama going to make us amend it to include 'data' or is that already implied?
KBK
1 / 5 (2) Mar 13, 2016
You all voted for this fascist. What are you going to do about it?


The two leading parties in the US are controlled opposition. A ping pong game to hypnotize the ignorant.

Both parties run by the same people, who hide in the backdrop. Note the total lack of any agenda, by any US president, in the past 6-8 elections, that did not come straight out of secrect societies and fascist oligarchy. Dem or Rep, they take their marching orders from the same oligarchy.

I don't think that the USA has had a real actual democracy -----in all of living memory.

There is no democracy, it's a plastic shiny front ---for children, who don't look deep enough.

Fascist, secret society, oligarchy, corporatism, wars, violence, depopulation, de-evoltuion through chemicals , etc, to gain control and keep control, via intelligence reduction in the common person. These things are held to be self evident.

You are their bitch, their toy, the thing they manipulate - from just out of sight.
Volund
1 / 5 (3) Mar 13, 2016
The hypocrisy of Obama obviously knows no bounds.

When the right wing science denying Republicans say they do not believe in climate change Obama tells them that the expert scientists are in agreement and science does not allow for uninformed opinions.

When every security person in the world tells Obama that no there is no magic "only let the good guys" in back door Obama ignores them and says "there must be a way to give me what I want".

So if science agrees with what he wants he is all for it. If it goes against what he wants he ignores it or tells the experts they are wrong.

How is that any different from the climate deniers?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.