Greenland's ice is getting darker, increasing risk of melting

March 3, 2016
An aerial image of Greenland shows rivers of meltwater and areas of dark ice. Greenland's surface is absorbing more solar radiation as melting increases grain size and brings old impurities to the surface. Credit: Marco Tedesco/Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory

Greenland's snowy surface has been getting darker over the past two decades, absorbing more heat from the sun and increasing snow melt, a new study of satellite data shows. That trend is likely to continue, with the surface's reflectivity, or albedo, decreasing by as much as 10 percent by the end of the century, the study says.

While soot blowing in from wildfires contributes to the problem, it hasn't been driving the change, the study finds. The real culprits are two feedback loops created by the melting itself. One of those processes isn't visible to the human eye, but it is having a profound effect.

The results, published in the European Geophysical Union journal The Cryosphere, have global implications. Fresh meltwater pouring into the ocean from Greenland raises sea level and could affect ocean ecology and circulation.

"You don't necessarily have to have a 'dirtier' snowpack to make it dark," said lead author Marco Tedesco, a research professor at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory and adjunct scientist at NASA Goddard Institute of Space Studies. "A snowpack that might look 'clean' to our eyes can be more effective in absorbing solar radiation than a dirty one. Overall, what matters, it is the total amount of solar energy that the surface absorbs. This is the real driver of melting."

The feedback loops work like this: During a warm summer with clear skies and lots of solar radiation pouring in, the surface starts to melt. As the top layers of fresh snow disappear, old impurities, like dust from erosion or soot that blew in years before, begin to appear, darkening the surface. A warm summer can remove enough snow to allow several years of impurities to concentrate at the surface as surrounding snow layers disappear. At the same time, as the snow melts and refreezes, the grains of snow get larger. This is because the meltwater acts like glue, sticking grains together when the surface refreezes. The larger grains create a less reflective surface that allows more solar radiation to be absorbed. The impact of grain size on albedo - the ratio between reflected and incoming solar radiation - is strong in the infrared range, where humans can't see, but satellite instruments can detect the change.

"It's a complex system of interaction between the atmosphere and the ice sheet surface. Rising temperatures are promoting more melting, and that melting is reducing albedo, which in turn is increasing melting," Tedesco said. "How this accumulates over decades is going to be important, because it can accelerate the amount of water Greenland loses. Even if we don't have a lot of melting because of atmospheric conditions one year, the surface is more sensitive to any kind of input the sun can give it, because of the previous cycle."

The study used satellite data to compare summertime changes in Greenland's albedo from 1981 to 2012. The first decade showed little change, but starting around 1996, the data show that due to darkening, the ice began absorbing about 2 percent more solar radiation per decade. At the same time, summer near-surface temperatures in Greenland increased at a rate of about 0.74?C per decade, allowing more snow to melt and fuel the feedback loops.

A likely cause for the large shift around 1996 was a change in atmospheric circulation, Tedesco said. The North Atlantic Oscillation, a large-scale natural weather cycle, went into a phase in which summer atmospheric conditions favored more incoming solar radiation and warmer, moist air from the south. Later records show those conditions shifted in 2013-2014 to favor less melting, but the damage was already done - the ice sheet had become more sensitive. In 2015, melting spiked again to reach more than half of the Greenland ice sheet.

While new snowfall can make the ice sheet brighter again, the dark material built up during the melt years is waiting just below the surface, preconditioning the surface to future melting, Tedesco said.

The scientists also ran a computer model to simulate the future of Greenland's surface temperature, grain size, exposed ice area and albedo. Over the current century, the model projects that the average albedo for the entire ice sheet will fall by as much as 8 percent, and by as much 10 percent on the western edge, where the ice is darkest today. Those are conservative estimates - the change could be twice that, Tedesco said.

The scientists looked into the hypothesis that soot from forest fires in China, Siberia and North America could be driving the increased darkening of the ice sheet. Using the Global Fire Emissions Database, they analyzed trends in black-carbon emissions from wildfires in those regions and Europe. While the amount of black carbon released by fires varied year to year, the scientists found no statistically significant increase during 1997-2012 to match the darkening of Greenland.

The study also raises questions about whether Greenland's high plateau is darkening as previous reports have suggested. The scientists found no long-term trend of darkening at the top, and they suspect that the Terra MODIS satellite sensor that has detected darkening in the past may actually be degrading, as previous studies have suggested. At lower elevations, the signal is much stronger.

"It is a very good paper which provides valuable new insights about the physical processes controlling the change in reflectivity of the Greenland ice sheet and specifically its darkening over time," said Eric Rignot, a senior research scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory who studies ice sheets but was not involved with the new study. "I also find it particularly interesting that the darkening indicated earlier by satellite sensors is now confirmed to be less, which is good news for the ice sheet. Yet the darkening of Greenland around its periphery remains a source of concern because it contributes to making the melt away faster."

The feedback loops could be stopped with lots of snowfall and less melting, but that doesn't seem likely given the increasing concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, Tedesco said. And while warming is expected to increase precipitation, that precipitation includes increasing rainfall, which speeds up melting. Melting is also moving to higher elevations as global temperatures warm.

"As warming continues, the feedback from declining albedo will add up," Tedesco said. "It's a train running downhill, and the hill is getting steeper."

Explore further: Greenland darkening to continue, predicts CCNY expert Marco Tedesco

More information: M. Tedesco et al. The darkening of the Greenland ice sheet: trends, drivers and projections (1981–2100), The Cryosphere Discussions (2015). DOI: 10.5194/tcd-9-5595-2015

Related Stories

Arctic snow not darkening due to soot, dust, study finds

October 31, 2015

For millennia, Greenland's ice sheet reflected sunlight back into space, but satellite measurements in recent years suggest the bright surface is darkening, causing solar heat to be absorbed and surface melting to accelerate. ...

How ice sheets collapse—a lesson from the past

February 19, 2016

Antarctica and Greenland may be two of the most remote places on Earth but what happens in both these vast landscapes can significantly impact on human activity further afield.

Recommended for you

Air pollution may have masked mid-20th Century sea ice loss

February 23, 2017

Humans may have been altering Arctic sea ice longer than previously thought, according to researchers studying the effects of air pollution on sea ice growth in the mid-20th Century. The new results challenge the perception ...

Melting sea ice may be speeding nature's clock in the Arctic

February 23, 2017

Spring is coming sooner to some plant species in the low Arctic of Greenland, while other species are delaying their emergence amid warming winters. The changes are associated with diminishing sea ice cover, according to ...

12 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

nobodysknowledge
1 / 5 (5) Mar 04, 2016
Willis Eschenbach has analyzed the albedo data for Greenland, using CERES satelite data. And there is no trend in this data between 2000 and 2015. 2012 is the year with most icemelting. Years from 1996 to 1998 are outliars when it comes to global temperature. So if you cherrypick 1996 as starting point and 2012 as endpoint, and cherrypick certain areas, og course you will find some trends. And it looks like the period between 1981 and 1996 is of no interest as it cannot show any trend. The study came out in 2015, and the period of 2012 to 2015 show no trend either. Conclusion: no albedo change between 1981 and 2015.
Maggnus
5 / 5 (5) Mar 05, 2016
Willis Eschenbach

Credentials

California Massage Certificate, Aames School of Massage, Oakland, CA. (1974).
B.A., Psychology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA. (1975).

A massage therapist is your source? No wonder you have no idea what you are talking about, you cite other people who also don't know what they are talking about.
Captain Stumpy
4.2 / 5 (5) Mar 05, 2016
A massage therapist is your source? No wonder you have no idea what you are talking about, you cite other people who also don't know what they are talking about.
@Maggnus
i wonder if they're teaching this in a class somewhere?
this is almost like what antiG did here: http://phys.org/n...mon.html

Whydening Gyre
5 / 5 (4) Mar 05, 2016
Willis Eschenbach

Credentials

California Massage Certificate, Aames School of Massage, Oakland, CA. (1974).
B.A., Psychology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA. (1975).

A massage therapist is your source? No wonder you have no idea what you are talking about, you cite other people who also don't know what they are talking about.

Now, THAT's funny...;-)
Whydening Gyre
4.8 / 5 (4) Mar 05, 2016
Anyway, This article reeks of common sense.
Someone better deny it quick before it becomes too well read and thought of...
nobodysknowledge
1 / 5 (3) Mar 08, 2016
What is a really serious abuse of science is to use the trend, that has no basis in data, to predict climate change. "Albedo projections through the end of the century under different warming scenarios consistently point to continued darkening, with albedo anomalies in 2100 averaged over the whole ice sheet lower than in 2000 by 0.08, driven solely by a warming climate." This is so misleading that even a massage therapist can see it.
Maggnus
5 / 5 (1) Mar 08, 2016
What is a really serious abuse of science is to use the trend, that has no basis in data, to predict climate change. "Albedo projections through the end of the century under different warming scenarios consistently point to continued darkening, with albedo anomalies in 2100 averaged over the whole ice sheet lower than in 2000 by 0.08, driven solely by a warming climate." This is so misleading that even a massage therapist can see it.

Only if you don't have the cognitive capacity to understand the words printed in the article.

Is English your 2nd language?
leetennant
5 / 5 (2) Mar 08, 2016
What is a really serious abuse of science is to use the trend, that has no basis in data, to predict climate change. "Albedo projections through the end of the century under different warming scenarios consistently point to continued darkening, with albedo anomalies in 2100 averaged over the whole ice sheet lower than in 2000 by 0.08, driven solely by a warming climate." This is so misleading that even a massage therapist can see it.

Only if you don't have the cognitive capacity to understand the words printed in the article.

Is English your 2nd language?


If I had a dollar for every denier whose posts basically say "My problem with the science is that I don't understand statistics" I'd be a billionaire by now.
antigoracle
1 / 5 (1) Mar 08, 2016
If I had a dollar for every denier whose posts basically say "My problem with the science is that I don't understand statistics" I'd be a billionaire by now.

If I had a dollar for every Chicken Little who actually understands science, I wouldn't have a dollar.
antigoracle
1 / 5 (1) Mar 08, 2016
Although there has been a considerable temperature increase during the last decade (1995 to 2005) a similar increase and at a faster rate occurred during the early part of the 20th century (1920 to 1930) when carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases could not be a cause. The Greenland warming of 1920 to 1930 demonstrates that a high concentration of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases is not a necessary condition for period of warming to arise. The observed 1995–2005 temperature increase seems to be within a natural variability of Greenland climate.

https://angusmac....2006.pdf
kochevnik
not rated yet Mar 08, 2016
Tax the darkness...
nobodysknowledge
not rated yet Mar 10, 2016

The whole article is on: the-cryosphere-discuss.net/9/5595/2015/tcd-9-5595-2015.pdf
"Albedo projections through the end of the century under different warming scenarios consistently point to continued darkening, with albedo anomalies in 2100 averaged over the whole ice sheet lower than in 2000 by 0.08, driven solely by a warming climate."
I think that this prediction is clear. Short wawe radiation out, over Greenland, will decrease, according to these scientists. The only way to find out if this is true is to follow TOA SW radiation out for some decades.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.