Age of blueschist does not indicate the origin of plate tectonics

December 15, 2015, Universitaet Mainz
Blueschist is named for its blue-violet color that is due to the presence of the mineral glaucophane. The green mineral in the rock is called epidote. Credit: © Richard White

One of the big mysteries in the history of the Earth is the development of plate tectonics. When exactly did these processes begin? Scientific opinion varies widely.

The dominant view is that oceanic plates have been pushing under other plates and sinking into the Earth's mantle—a process known as subduction—since the beginning of the Hadean eon, more than four billion years ago. Others date the onset of plate tectonic movements to the Neoproterozoic era of 500 to 1,000 million years ago. This hypothesis is based on the fact that the mineral blueschist began to appear 700 to 800 million years ago. Geoscientists at Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (JGU) in Germany have now shown that the appearance of blueschist is connected to long-term changes in the composition of the and therefore does not date . The study has been published in the eminent journal Nature Geoscience.

Blueschist is a blue-violet-colored rock that is relatively rare and is found in the Alps, in Japan, on the west coast of the USA and other places. The oldest blueschist found originated in the Neoproterozoic era and is 700 to 800 million years old. This metavolcanic rock is created during the subduction of oceanic crust. High pressure and relatively of 200 to 500 degrees Celsius are required for its formation. As such conditions have only prevailed in in the recent past, blueschist provides evidence of when subduction-driven plate tectonics occurred. The reason why there was no blueschist present on Earth during its first 3.8 billion years is a hotly contested topic among geologists.

"We know that the formation of blueschist is definitely linked to subduction," explained Professor Richard White of the Institute of Geosciences at Mainz University. "The fact that the oldest blueschist is only 700 to 800 million years old does not mean, however, that there were no subduction processes before then, as is sometimes claimed," added Dr. Richard Palin. In their study, the two researchers have now managed to demonstrate for the first time that the absence of blueschist in the earliest geological periods is due to a change in the chemical composition of the ocean's crust in the course of the Earth's history, which in turn is a result of the gradual cooling of the Earth's mantle since the Archean eon.

Greenschist takes its name from the actinolite and chlorite minerals it contains. Also present are quartz and epidote. Credit: Richard White

The oceanic crust that formed on the early, hot Earth was rich in magnesium oxide. Using computer models, Palin and White have been able to show that it was not possible for blueschist to form from this magnesium oxide-rich rock during subduction. Instead, the subduction of the magnesium oxide-rich oceanic crust led to the formation of rock similar to greenschist, which is a metamorphic rock that is formed today at low temperatures and low pressure. Since these greenschist rocks can hold more water than most blueschist, more fluid was able to enter the early Earth's mantle than today, a factor that has an effect on the formation of magmas, which is one of the topics being studied by the Volcanoes and Atmosphere in Magmatic Open Systems (VAMOS) research unit at Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz.

Explore further: Earth's crust was unstable in the Archean eon and dripped down into the mantle

More information: Richard M. Palin et al. Emergence of blueschists on Earth linked to secular changes in oceanic crust composition, Nature Geoscience (2015). DOI: 10.1038/NGEO2605

Related Stories

Studying ancient Earth's geochemistry

January 18, 2013

Researchers still have much to learn about the volcanism that shaped our planet's early history. New evidence from a team led by Carnegie's Frances Jenner demonstrates that some of the tectonic processes driving volcanic ...

How the Earth's Pacific plates collapsed

November 24, 2015

Scientists drilling into the ocean floor have for the first time found out what happens when one tectonic plate first gets pushed under another.

Recommended for you

Nanoscale Lamb wave-driven motors in nonliquid environments

March 19, 2019

Light driven movement is challenging in nonliquid environments as micro-sized objects can experience strong dry adhesion to contact surfaces and resist movement. In a recent study, Jinsheng Lu and co-workers at the College ...

OSIRIS-REx reveals asteroid Bennu has big surprises

March 19, 2019

A NASA spacecraft that will return a sample of a near-Earth asteroid named Bennu to Earth in 2023 made the first-ever close-up observations of particle plumes erupting from an asteroid's surface. Bennu also revealed itself ...

Levitating objects with light

March 19, 2019

Researchers at Caltech have designed a way to levitate and propel objects using only light, by creating specific nanoscale patterning on the objects' surfaces.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Dec 15, 2015
Naively one would ask if there was a beginning to plate tectonics at all. When the entire earth was entirely molten it would have convected. Locations on the surface which were rising or falling would be more fluid than those sludgy places inbetween the rising and falling zones. That's techtonics. To determine when those sludgy bits become "plates" seems to be like trying to decide exactly how high is the upper limit of the atmosphere. To answer the question accurately you have to give an error-bar related to the density. Changing the error-bar on the 'sludge' would shift the geological time significantly. The easy, and likely accurate, answer is that it always had plate techtonics even when the plates couldn't support a solid mass. So I began with the word "naively" and I leave with the naive notion that pursuing this question naively approaches a Zeno's Paradox - it's answered when you decide it is.
not rated yet Dec 15, 2015
I wonder if this early 'hot' crust was the result of having the lithosphere ripped off to create the Moon. Much less lithosphere equals thin crust enabling 'plate tectonics,'

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.