Second thoughts? Countries delay leap second decision until 2023: UN

The interior of a 1970s-vintage "atomic clock" designed to work in space, photographed April 10 2013  at the Smithsoni
The interior of a 1970s-vintage "atomic clock" designed to work in space, photographed April 10 2013 at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum in Washington
It is no split-second decision. In fact, countries are at such odds over whether to do away with the "leap second"—an extra second periodically added to compensate for irregularities in the earth's rotation around the sun—that they have put off deciding the matter until 2023, the United Nations announced Thursday.

Country representatives gathered for a conference in Geneva hosted by the UN's International Telecommunication Union (ITU) have been haggling over the issue since the beginning of the month without reaching agreement.

The World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-15) "has decided that further studies are required on the impact and application of a future reference time-scale, including ... suppressing the so-called 'leap second'," ITU said in a statement.

The WRC conferences are held only every four years, and a report on the impact of removing the leap second would be prepared for the conference to be held in eight year's time, the UN agency said.

While passing most people by unnoticed, the leap second has been a bone of contention among experts for years.

There have been 26 occasions since 1971 when the leap second was added, most recently on June 30 this year.

Timekeepers adjust high-precision clocks so that they remain in sync with Earth's rotation, which is affected by the gravitational tug of the Sun and the Moon, in a bid to simplify Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), the official monicker for GMT.

Use atomic clocks instead?

The decision on when to add a an extra second falls to the Earth Orientation Centre, a Paris-based division of the International Earth Rotation and Reference System Service, and must be announced "at least eight weeks in advance," ITU spokesman Sanjay Acharya told AFP.

But such additions, which occur about once every three years, can be complicated due to computer systems' reliance on exact time measurements.

Debate has intensified in recent years over making the addition of seconds to Coordinated Universal Time more predictable, particularly following technology disruptions after the modification in 2012.

While some countries, including Britain, want to hold onto the system, others, including the United States and France, would like to see the leap second done away with.

They instead would like global timekeeping to rely solely on , which use the frequency of atoms as their tick-tock mechanism.

At the top of the atomic-clock range are "optical lattices" using strontium atoms, the latest example of which, unveiled in April, is accurate to 15 billion years—longer than the Universe has existed.

They argue that throwing an extra second into the mix can, as in 2012, have widespread consequences for the Internet, which sends data around the world in tiny packets that are then stitched together in micro-seconds.

Global Positioning System (GPS) satellites also rely on super-precise timekeeping to send synchronised signals so sat-nav receivers can triangulate their position on Earth.

Space explorers are also wary of leap seconds and the havoc they might wreak, carefully avoiding launches on the days the seconds are added.


Explore further

Second thoughts: Is a tiny addition in time too much?

© 2015 AFP

Citation: Second thoughts? Countries delay leap second decision until 2023: UN (2015, November 19) retrieved 20 July 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2015-11-thoughts-countries-decision.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
90 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Nov 20, 2015
I thought the UTC was already based on atomic clock, what do they use then if it isn't so? And why don't they make the switch? Seems like a no-brainer to me we should pick the most reliable system rather then a bad one we have to patch with leap seconds

Nov 20, 2015
@Bulbuzor
UTC uses the same SI second unit as the International Atomic Time except that the duration of a day is linked to celestial time UT1. Since the earth is not a precise clock, seconds are added once in a while to resynchronise the Earth's day with our temporal unit. http://www.timean...ime.html

For your information Earth is slowing down principally by momentum transfer to the Moon.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more