Powerful jets from non-spinning black holes

November 18, 2015
A multi-wavelength image of the ultra-luminous X-ray source X2 in the galaxy M82. Scientists have had a difficult time understanding the mechanisms powering its intense emission. A new paper successfully proposes an alternate explanation to magnetically dominated black hole rotation, namely, that the X-ray jets are radiatively driven. Credit: X-ray: NASA/CXC/Univ. of Toulouse/M.Bachetti et al, Optical: NOAO/AURA/NSF

A black hole is so simple (at least in traditional theories) that it can be completely described by just three parameters: its mass, its spin, and its electric charge. Even though it may have formed out of a complex mix of matter and energy, all the other specific details are lost when it collapses to a singular point. The environment of a black hole is not so simple, however. As material flows in towards the black hole, a hot accretion disk develops. In galaxies with active black hole nuclei, the disks facilitate the production of powerful jets of ionized matter. In some cases the jet particles are driven to velocities close to the speed of light. These jets are thought to be powered by the rotational energy of the spinning black hole, with magnetic fields playing a pivotal role.

CfA astronomer Ramesh Narayan and his colleague have discovered an alternative explanation for the driving mechanism of the . Instead of rotation-powered, magnetically dominated jets, they find that non-spinning black holes can also drive powerful jets by means of the intense radiation emitted by hot gas. The gravity of the black hole attracts the radiation, which becomes concentrated enough that its pressure can drive the jet's particles at speeds up to about half the speed of light, at least under appropriate disk geometries.

Their result provides an alternative explanation for some puzzling astrophysical observations. Ultraluminous X-ray sources around the sky are thought to arise around of about ten solar-masses in size, but the models can't explain the energetics of all of the observations unless the X-ray emission is emitted in narrow beams rather than isotropically. In the new alternative scenario, in which radiation drives the jets, the source naturally emits particles in narrow beams.

Explore further: Black hole jets

More information: Aleksander Sądowski et al. Powerful radiative jets in supercritical accretion discs around non-spinning black holes, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2015). DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv1802

Related Stories

Black hole jets

January 16, 2012

(PhysOrg.com) -- Black holes are irresistible sinks for matter and energy. They are so dense that not even light can escape from their gravitational clutches. Massive black holes (equal to millions or even billions of solar ...

Study suggests black hole jets get their power from spin

November 20, 2014

(Phys.org) —A team of space scientists working in Italy has found more evidence that suggests the energy needed to emit jets from supermassive black holes comes from the spin of the black hole itself. In their paper published ...

Image: A supermassive black hole in action

November 17, 2015

Scientists often use the combined power of multiple telescopes to reveal the secrets of the Universe – and this image is a prime example of when this technique is strikingly effective.

Recommended for you

Telescopes team up to study giant galaxy

December 12, 2017

Astronomers have used two Australian radio telescopes and several optical telescopes to study complex mechanisms that are fuelling jets of material blasting away from a black hole 55 million times more massive than the Sun.

Unravelling the mysteries of extragalactic jets

December 11, 2017

University of Leeds researchers have mathematically examined plasma jets from supermassive black holes to determine why certain types of jets disintegrate into huge plumes.

The initial mass function

December 11, 2017

The gas and dust in giant molecular clouds gradually come together under the influence of gravity to form stars. Precisely how this occurs, however, is incompletely understood. The mass of a star, for example, is by far the ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

cantdrive85
1 / 5 (4) Nov 18, 2015
More metaphysical pseudoscientific mumbo jumbo. Swell.
Captain Stumpy
1 / 5 (1) Nov 19, 2015
no... "metaphysical pseudoscientific mumbo jumbo" would be something like
"Most comets should be homogeneous—their interiors will have the same composition as their surfaces. They are simply "asteroids on eccentric orbits."
Thornhill & Talbott
http://aetherforc...talbott/

or it would be things you post like: electric sun (debunked), grand canyon/moon crater formations (debunked), Shoemaker-levy9 breaking apart due to plasma discharge (debunked/not observed -complete hogwash) and much more

(special thanks to jonesdave for the links: http://phys.org/n...tis.html )

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.