Some monkeys can understand danger calls made by different monkey species

April 29, 2015 by Bob Yirka, report

Some monkeys can understand danger calls made by different monkey species
(—A team of researchers with members from France, Ivory Coast, Switzerland and the U.K. has found that some monkeys of one species are able to listen in and respond to communications made by monkeys of another species. In their paper published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, the researchers describe a field study they conducted with two monkey species and what they learned from it.

Human beings are the only species known to have a complete language, though other animals make sounds that can be interpreted by others of their species, and now it appears that at least in one case, the sounds made by one can be interpreted by members of another. In this new effort focusing on the of monkeys the researchers looked to Campbell's and Diana monkeys living in the Ivory Coast.

Prior research has found that male Campbell's monkeys use at least six unique sounds to convey information to their group members. Two of those "krak" and "krak-oo" have been found to be variations of the same idea—there is a threat at hand. Krak is more specific however, it means that a leopard is nearby whereas adding that oo suffix waters it down to meaning there is some threat, but it is not a leopard. Because Diana monkeys live in the same places as Campbell's monkeys, the team wondered if they were able to understand the danger calls of the Campbell's. To find out, they made recordings of Campbell's monkey calls, and edited some of them—adding or removing the oo suffix. Then, they took the recordings into the jungle and played them in the vicinity of Diana monkeys and watched to see how they responded.

The team found that the Diana monkeys reacted to the Campbell's monkey calls in a manner almost identical to other Campbell's monkeys—they grew much more agitated when hearing the krak call then when hearing the krak—oo call, and remained on alert longer, which the team claims proves that the Diana were able to differentiate between the two and to respond accordingly.

Explore further: Linguistic methods uncover sophisticated meanings, monkey dialects

More information: Suffixation influences receivers' behaviour in non-human primates, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Published 29 April 2015. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0265

Compared to humans, non-human primates have very little control over their vocal production. Nonetheless, some primates produce various call combinations, which may partially offset their lack of acoustic flexibility. A relevant example is male Campbell's monkeys (Cercopithecus campbelli), which give one call type ('Krak') to leopards, while the suffixed version of the same call stem ('Krak-oo') is given to unspecific danger. To test whether recipients attend to this suffixation pattern, we carried out a playback experiment in which we broadcast naturally and artificially modified suffixed and unsuffixed 'Krak' calls of male Campbell's monkeys to 42 wild groups of Diana monkeys (Cercopithecus diana diana). The two species form mixed-species groups and respond to each other's vocalizations. We analysed the vocal response of male and female Diana monkeys and overall found significantly stronger vocal responses to unsuffixed (leopard) than suffixed (unspecific danger) calls. Although the acoustic structure of the 'Krak' stem of the calls has some additional effects, subject responses were mainly determined by the presence or the absence of the suffix. This study indicates that suffixation is an evolved function in primate communication in contexts where adaptive responses are particularly important.

Related Stories

Syntax in our primate cousins

December 11, 2009

( -- A study carried out in Ivory Coast has shown that monkeys of a certain forest-dwelling species called Campbell's monkeys emit six types of alert calls. The primates combine these calls into long vocal sequences ...

I wanna talk like you (oo)

December 16, 2011

The role of social structure in animal communication is hotly debated. Non-human primates seem to be born with a range of calls and sounds which is dependent upon their species. But overlying this there seems to be some flexibility ...

Recommended for you

Scientists ID another possible threat to orcas: pink salmon

January 19, 2019

Over the years, scientists have identified dams, pollution and vessel noise as causes of the troubling decline of the Pacific Northwest's resident killer whales. Now, they may have found a new and more surprising culprit: ...

Researchers come face to face with huge great white shark

January 18, 2019

Two shark researchers who came face to face with what could be one of the largest great whites ever recorded are using their encounter as an opportunity to push for legislation that would protect sharks in Hawaii.

Why do Hydra end up with just a single head?

January 18, 2019

Often considered immortal, the freshwater Hydra can regenerate any part of its body, a trait discovered by the Geneva naturalist Abraham Trembley nearly 300 years ago. Any fragment of its body containing a few thousands cells ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (2) Apr 29, 2015
Yeah, you do have a point. We as people can intuitively understand what a growl or a hiss means, just as our pets can understand when we are angry or crying.

At least they came to the right conclusion.
not rated yet Apr 29, 2015
Blue Jays warn the squirrels, the Cardinals are alerted by the squirrels and Blue Jays. I agree with Lex, hardly a startling conclusion.
Steve 200mph Cruiz
5 / 5 (2) Apr 29, 2015
Lex you have to actually prove things. Do you know what different monkey sounds mean?
1 / 5 (1) Apr 30, 2015
Would the designation "some monkeys" include these researchers?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.