Judge sides with government in lawsuit over surveillance

February 11, 2015

A federal judge on Tuesday sided with the government in a lawsuit alleging the National Security Agency is illegally engaging in the bulk collection of Internet and telephone records in the hunt for potential terrorists.

U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White in Oakland said the plaintiffs in the case—AT&T customers—had not shown that all AT&T customers' Internet communications were currently the subject of a "dragnet seizure and search program, controlled by or at the direction of the Government," and they therefore did not have standing to file a under the Fourth Amendment, which protects against warrantless searches and seizures.

White said the plaintiffs' understanding of the key parts of the data collection process was "substantially inaccurate."

Additionally, even if the plaintiffs had standing, White said a Fourth Amendment claim would have to be dismissed to protect secret information that would damage national security if released. He granted partial summary judgment for the government.

"The Court is frustrated by the prospect of deciding the current motions without full public disclosure of the Court's analysis and reasoning...," White wrote in his ruling. "The Court is persuaded that its decision is correct both legally and factually and furthermore is required by the interests of national security."

The judge did not dismiss all of the claims in the suit, said Nate Cardozo, a staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which brought the suit in 2008.

Still, he said the judge's ruling was disappointing.

"What we want is a court to rule on the merits of the NSA's program," he said. "Is what they are doing legal? Is it constitutional? The court didn't do that. It didn't say 'yes' or 'no.'

The foundation plans to continue fighting the case, Cardozo said.

Cardozo said other pending lawsuits are challenging the government's collection of telephone metadata such as the duration of a call and to whom it was placed.

Explore further: Court rejects early appeal of surveillance ruling

Related Stories

Judge dismisses lawsuit over NSA cellphone data

June 4, 2014

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit an Idaho woman filed against President Barack Obama and other federal officials over the National Security Agency's collection of cellphone information.

Judges hear arguments over NSA surveillance (Update)

December 8, 2014

A federal appeals court heard arguments Monday in an Idaho woman's challenge to the National Security Agency's bulk collection of phone records—the third time in recent months that appeals courts around the country have ...

Judge's word on NSA program won't be the last

December 17, 2013

A federal judge is making headlines by declaring that the National Security Agency's bulk collection of millions of Americans' telephone records is likely unconstitutional. But even he realizes his won't be the last word ...

Recommended for you

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Returners
1 / 5 (1) Feb 11, 2015
Additionally, even if the plaintiffs had standing, White said a Fourth Amendment claim would have to be dismissed to protect secret information that would damage national security if released. He granted partial summary judgment for the government.


The Commerce Clause gives the Federal Government power over anything that crosses state lines, Federal lands, or water ways or the national borders anyway, which I'm pretty sure that covers the majority of AT&T customers one way or another.

You don't need a Warrant to search something that crosses a water way.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.