Study: Oklahoma's daily small quakes raise risk of big ones

February 14, 2015 bySeth Borenstein

Small earthquakes shaking Oklahoma and southern Kansas daily and linked to energy drilling are dramatically increasing the chance of bigger and dangerous quakes, federal research indicates.

This once stable region is now just as likely to see serious damaging and potentially harmful earthquakes as the highest risk places east of the Rockies such as New Madrid, Missouri, and Charleston, South Carolina, which had major quakes in the past two centuries.

Still it's a low risk, about a 1 in 2,500 years' chance of happening, according to geophysicist William Ellsworth of the U.S. Geological Survey.

"To some degree we've dodged a bullet in Oklahoma," Ellsworth said after a presentation to the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

But, he added, "This is not to say we expect a large earthquake tomorrow."

During the 90-minute session on human-induced earthquakes, three quakes larger than 3.1 magnitude hit northern Oklahoma. Federal records show that since Jan. 1, Oklahoma has had nearly 200 quakes that people have felt. These quakes started to increase in 2008 and made dramatic jumps in frequency in June 2013 and again in February 2014, Ellsworth said.

They are mostly in areas with energy drilling, often hydraulic fracturing, a process known as fracking. Many studies have linked the increase in to the process of injecting wastewater deep underground because it changes pressure and triggers dormant faults.

Until now, those quakes were mostly thought of as nuisances and not really threats. But Ellsworth's continuing study, which is not yet published, showed the mere increase In the number of tiny temblors raises the risk of earthquakes that scientists consider major hazards. That's generally above a magnitude 5 with older buildings and a magnitude 6 for modern ones, Ellsworth said.

"The more small earthquakes we have it just simply increases the odds we're going to have a more damaging event," Ellsworth said.

A 2011 in Prague, Oklahoma, was a 5.7 magnitude, causing some damage and hurting two people. Some studies said that was a side effect of the drilling process, but other scientists are not convinced.

Experts at the science session said Ellsworth's finding of a higher risk for big quakes makes sense.

"We are worried about this, no question about it," said Rex Buchanan, interim director of the Kansas Geological Survey.

Not all states with fracking and wastewater injections are seeing increased quakes and not all those with increased quakes, such as Texas and Ohio, are at a higher risk for major quakes, Ellsworth said. Arkansas and Ohio, for example, are also now seeing fewer man-made quakes, he said.

Much depends on geology and how the wastewater is injected, said Stanford University geophysics professor Mark Zoback. He said industry and regulators can be smarter about where they inject wastewater and where they do not, and can avoid many of these problems.

Explore further: USGS says seven small earthquakes shake central Oklahoma

More information: U.S. Geological Survey's Did You Feel It earthquake program: tinyurl.com/yaqmeyw

Related Stories

Less shake from artificial quakes, study says

August 19, 2014

Man-made earthquakes, a side effect of some high-tech energy drilling, cause less shaking and in general are about 16 times weaker than natural earthquakes with the same magnitude, a new U.S. study found.

Recommended for you

Hot spot at Hawaii? Not so fast

August 18, 2017

Through analysis of volcanic tracks, Rice University geophysicists have concluded that hot spots like those that formed the Hawaiian Islands aren't moving as fast as recently thought.

Supervolcanoes: A key to America's electric future?

August 16, 2017

Most of the lithium used to make the lithium-ion batteries that power modern electronics comes from Australia and Chile. But Stanford scientists say there are large deposits in sources right here in America: supervolcanoes.

Greenland ice flow likely to speed up

August 16, 2017

Flow of the Greenland Ice Sheet is likely to speed up in the future, despite a recent slowdown, because its outlet glaciers slide over wet sediment, not hard rock, new research based on seismic surveys has confirmed. This ...

6 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Steve 200mph Cruiz
4.5 / 5 (2) Feb 14, 2015
Is there any study out there showing how long bed rock takes to repair itself? I'm sure that rock is billions of years old. Are those guys just going to have earthquakes forever now or will the rock settle someday by pushing the goop out to other places?
mndaffy
5 / 5 (1) Feb 14, 2015
It would be interesting to see the depth of the New Madrid Earthquake (proposed) and chart that with depth of these smaller quakes on the lithology profile. Was the New Madrid quake a result of rotational dynamics exerting shear strain as well as extensional stress? I am guessing we have to wait for the publication.
jazzy_j_man
5 / 5 (2) Feb 15, 2015
It's starting to look like a big variable is the archeo-fault structure. There are ancient faults there that predate Pangea and it is starting to look like they may be responding to injection. If so, Oklahoma is really vulnerable. The swarm around the old Texas Stadium in Irving appears to be another such case. Below the Trinity River is another riverbed from far before, right below UTD's gas well.

Yeah, big speculation, but what isn't is that it's irresponsible public policy to run (yet another) uncontrolled experiment on nature at the behest of big energy. At a minimum we need enough monitoring stations to create tensor solutions for these quakes. Do you realize that the standard error of measurement on these is about twice the published depth??? When it says, "depth: five kilometers", not the fine print- "+- 7 kilometers". OK City's 5.2 was no small affair. Also, drillers should be required to have appropriate liability insurance with a well capitalized corp.
TheGhostofOtto1923
1 / 5 (2) Feb 15, 2015
It's starting to look like a big variable is the archeo-fault structure. There are ancient faults there that predate Pangea and it is starting to look like they may be responding to injection
Sorry but in order to be taken seriously you need to provide credible references for this.

And since the rest of your post is full of inciteful buzzwords, I suspect that you can provide no such references.
jyro
1 / 5 (1) Feb 15, 2015
I've done my own study, by lubricating the plates and allowing slight movements it relieves the stress in smaller increments preventing larger quakes.
MP3Car
not rated yet Feb 17, 2015
When it says, "depth: five kilometers", not the fine print- "+- 7 kilometers". OK City's 5.2 was no small affair. Also, drillers should be required to have appropriate liability insurance with a well capitalized corp.


FYI, OKC's EQ (actually Prague, just outside OKC) was 5.7 not 5.2. Also, I am not sure where you see 5km +/- 7km. The Oklahoma Geological Survey shows most are around 5km deep, +/- 1-2km.

Due to their extreme clustered nature of occurrence, people can be very close to hundreds and even 1,000+ EQs. In 2014, over 1,300 were less than 15 miles from my house, 150 of those were 3.0+, including a few 4.0+. If I expand radius to ~50 miles then the count jumps to ~3,300. For 2015, the total so far is ~679, with 121 3.0+. Also, you CAN feel 2.0-3.0 when they're just a few miles away. With such frequency, they appear to cause damage to houses. I have cracked sheetrock, slab and tiles, brick/stonework, etc, with some of the damage appearing right after ~4.0.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.