New study examines role of government in Deepwater Horizon oil spill

October 9, 2014 by Jon Reidel
Smoke billows over a controlled oil fire in the Gulf of Mexico off Venice, La., May 5, 2010. Credit: U.S. Coast Guard

A recent ruling by a federal judge that BP was "grossly negligent" in the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil rig spill in the Gulf of Mexico placed the majority of blame on the multinational oil and gas company. Although not on trial in this case, the federal government was also culpable in the largest oil spill in U.S. history, according to a new paper by Christopher Koliba, professor in Community Development and Applied Economics, and one of his former students.

Based on reports from the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling, the Chief Council's Report and other government documents, Koliba and Russell Mills, assistant professor in political science at Bowling Green State University, determined that the government's reliance on market-based accountability mechanisms and its failure to implement a regulatory process based on a mutually agreed upon set of robust standards and voluntary information disclosure led to the largest oil spill in U.S. history.

"The federal agency that was supposed to be regulating the oil industry had competing objectives," says Koliba. "They were charged with both promulgating economic development and ensuring public safety and environmental safety, and so when you get the same entity that's trying to both advance and also regulate, you get these convoluted lines of accountability, and I think the recent court ruling betrays that element. They totally ignored what the didn't do in the environment for letting this situation evolve the way it did."

Mills, a 2007 graduate of UVM's Master of Public Administration program, which Koliba directs, agrees with the blame assigned to BP, but says he'd give the U.S. Office of Management and Business (OMB) a quarter of the overall responsibility for the disaster. "Ultimately, OMB could have decided to force industry to implement more regulated practices, and they didn't."

Assigning blame, which the judge split among BP (67 percent), Transocean (30 percent), and Halliburton (3 percent), wasn't the only focus of Koliba and Mills' paper "The Challenges of Accountability in Complex Regulatory Networks: The Case of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill," however. The article, published in the Journal Regulation & Governance, highlights the challenges facing public administrators as they defer to the professional expertise of the private sector in highly complex industries like aviation or deepwater drilling.

"The private sector has such an information advantage over regulators that often times government is sort of guessing at what the private sector is really doing," says Mills, who previously worked as a policy analyst in the Office of Aviation Policy at the Federal Aviation Administration. "Those are advantages that private companies, in this case BP and Haliburton, have over government managers who just didn't have the professional capacity to effectively regulate."

Reduced funding creating unlikely alliances

Koliba and Mills attribute a reduction in funding and resources as the primary reason for increased collaborations between government, private sector industry and non-profits. Consequently, federal agencies are abandoning traditional government-centered regulatory oversight of the private sector focused on specific mandates ensured through inspections by agency personnel. Alternatives to this approach, known as process-oriented regulation, focus on collaborations between the regulated firm (BP) and the regulatory agency (U.S. government) based upon a set of mutually agreed upon standards and voluntary disclosure.

Such a system makes it "extremely challenging," Koliba says, to ensure accountability at a time when elected officials, light on funding, are increasingly opting to lean on the expertise of the private sector to develop their own compliance standards.

Mills views the new collaborative accountability to process-oriented regulation as based less on formal controls and more on informal things like trust, repeated interaction, experience of practice, and other mechanisms to ensure that the private sector is effectively regulated either by themselves or a combination of participants.

Those types of relationships can be tricky, however, if trust and collaboration become something else. "It's a thin line between collaboration and collusion," says Koliba. "In the regulatory world there's concern about regulatory capture. The critique of that approach is that when regulators and the industries they regulate have close trusting relationships, the ability to verify that proper compliance is being followed could get muddled."

Equally concerning is the possibility of contracted companies in highly specialized industries taking advantage of the relationship due to pressure from stockholders and other invested parties. Stern rulings like in the Deepwater Horizon case could prompt companies like BP to think twice about non-compliance.

"The importance of the ruling could set the precedence for the lead organizations in these networks to know that they have a level of culpability," says Koliba. "It sends a message to the industry that they can't just point fingers and that ultimately the buck will stop with the lead organization. It could be a seminal moment in process-oriented regulation."

Future applications of governance network accountability model

The initial idea for the Deepwater Horizon article flowed from a previous article written by Koliba, Mills and Asim Zia, associate professor in CDAE, that used a governance network accountability model created by the three researchers to look at the disaster response to Hurricane Katrina. The highly-cited article "Accountability in Governance Networks: An Assessment of Public, Private, and Nonprofit Emergency Management Practices Following Hurricane Katrina" was published in Public Administration Review and won the 2011 Marshall E. Dimock Award for the best lead article in PAR for that year.

Koliba and his colleagues plan to apply their accountability framework to other governance networks such as the Federal Aviation Administration and watershed governance in the Lake Champlain Basin.

"The framework was designed to allow researchers and practitioners to look at the tradeoffs between democracy, markets and administrative accountabilities," says Koliba. "It provides a way for researchers in different fields to analyze the tradeoffs between the three. There is often a lot of talk about the tradeoffs between democratic principles and market-based principles, for example, and this framework allows us to suss out those differences in a systematic way."

Explore further: US judge finds BP 'grossly negligent' in 2010 oil spill

Related Stories

Halliburton pays $1.1 bn for Gulf of Mexico BP spill

September 2, 2014

Oil services company Halliburton said Tuesday it would pay a $1.1 billion settlement over its role in the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil rig blowout that led to the United States' most disastrous oil spill.

Wait is on for judge's ruling in BP oil spill trial

May 27, 2013

Ed Sherman, a Tulane University law professor specializing in complex litigation, continues to closely monitor the BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill trial in New Orleans, almost three years after the Deepwater Horizon drilling ...

BP banned from US government contracts

November 28, 2012

British oil giant BP was temporarily banned by the US Environmental Protection Agency from US government contracts Wednesday due to its behavior in the April 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil disaster.

Recommended for you

Carbon coating gives biochar its garden-greening power

October 20, 2017

For more than 100 years, biochar, a carbon-rich, charcoal-like substance made from oxygen-deprived plant or other organic matter, has both delighted and puzzled scientists. As a soil additive, biochar can store carbon and ...

Cool roofs have water saving benefits too

October 20, 2017

The energy and climate benefits of cool roofs have been well established: By reflecting rather than absorbing the sun's energy, light-colored roofs keep buildings, cities, and even the entire planet cooler. Now a new study ...

Study finds pollution is deadlier than war, disaster, hunger

October 20, 2017

Environmental pollution—from filthy air to contaminated water—is killing more people every year than all war and violence in the world. More than smoking, hunger or natural disasters. More than AIDS, tuberculosis and ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

cdkeli
not rated yet Oct 09, 2014
Clearly statements such as these suggest BP and the Koch POS are most likely privately funding these bogus research efforts: "There is often a lot of talk about the tradeoffs between democratic principles and market-based principles, for example, and this framework allows us to suss out those differences in a systematic way."
the-truth-seeker
not rated yet Oct 10, 2014
What happened to the HUGE database of proposed spill mitigation methods, that BP assembled at the request of the government? Why has this database disappeared? Why didn't the government force BP to release it for study? Why haven't journalists demanded to see this database?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.