Climate change negatively impacting Great Lakes, researcher says

August 11, 2014

Climate change is having a direct negative effect on the Great Lakes, including impacts to recreational value, drinking water potential, and becoming more suited to invasive species and infectious pathogens, according to a Grand Valley State University researcher.

The impact of climate change on the Great Lakes, as well as other natural resources in the United States, was explored in the report "Science, Education, and Outreach Roadmap for Natural Resources," recently released by the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities. Kevin Strychar, an associate professor at Grand Valley's Annis Water Resources Institute, co-authored one of the chapters.

Strychar researches on aquatic and marine ecosystems, and has studied climate change impacts on organisms for 16 years in countries from Australia and Palau to Canada and the United States.

Strychar spent the past year working with 35 other authors to compile the section on climate change. In the report, Strychar and his co-authors described the need to increase understanding of the impacts of climate change on ecosystems, water supplies, air quality, fire, disease transmission and species survival.

One of the many conclusions reached by the researchers was the need to develop technology that allows real-time monitoring and management of water systems.

"Climate change has occurred in the past, but this time, the frequency of change is too fast, not allowing animals enough time to adapt," Strychar said. "Further complicating this issue is that we need not only study individual animals but their inter- and intra-dependencies on other animals and on the environment.

"Ignoring the problem is no longer a solution. Denying the plausibility of climate change is foolhardy. We need to accept the problem and now, find solutions—or at least minimize its impact on society and our planet as a whole."

The full report focuses on six "grand challenges" that are facing the U.S. in the areas of , water, sustainability, agriculture, energy and education.

Explore further: Climate change to profoundly alter Great Lakes region, summary report says

More information: To read the report, click here:

Related Stories

Climate change and the ecology of fear

June 27, 2014

Climate change is predicted to have major impacts on the many species that call our rocky shorelines home. Indeed, species living in these intertidal habitats, which spend half their day exposed to air and the other half ...

From climate change comes opportunity to innovate

May 7, 2014

A cursory look at the Third National Climate Assessment released Tuesday by the National Climate Assessment and Development Advisory Committee yields a grim outlook. The authors state that climate change is already beginning ...

Recommended for you

Carbon coating gives biochar its garden-greening power

October 20, 2017

For more than 100 years, biochar, a carbon-rich, charcoal-like substance made from oxygen-deprived plant or other organic matter, has both delighted and puzzled scientists. As a soil additive, biochar can store carbon and ...

Cool roofs have water saving benefits too

October 20, 2017

The energy and climate benefits of cool roofs have been well established: By reflecting rather than absorbing the sun's energy, light-colored roofs keep buildings, cities, and even the entire planet cooler. Now a new study ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.4 / 5 (9) Aug 11, 2014
There would be no bloom on the lakes if there was no chemical run-off from certain farming practices.

Adding global warming to the mix is simply politics and yet-more hype.

However, please keep the hype coming. If there has always been one main reason for hoaxes to be exposed, it is over-the-top hype.

If everyone is NOT convinced of a given opinion, turn-up the hype.
1 / 5 (7) Aug 11, 2014
Also, a certain experiment would be nice to hear about.

Hawaii, Mauna Loa has been monitoring CO2 in the atmosphere since 1958. Some 56 years.

Has an Artic core sample been taken at the depth (from 1958) and that CO2 sample compared to the readings from 1958?

Are they the same? If not we have a "decay" or "leakage" component.

I doubt if the number should be higher, but that would be interesting if it were.

If a leak, then all core samples should have their determined values increased.
Whydening Gyre
3 / 5 (2) Aug 11, 2014
Oops.. wrong thread...
5 / 5 (5) Aug 11, 2014
Quoting the authors of the study ""Ignoring the problem is no longer a solution. Denying the plausibility of climate change is foolhardy. We need to accept the problem and now, find solutions—or at least minimize its impact on society and our planet as a whole."
1 / 5 (3) Aug 12, 2014
Ignoring the problem is no longer a solution

Ermmm... when has ignoring a problem ever been a solution.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.