Is Google's project to monitor healthy people just a bit creepy?

July 31, 2014 by Blaine Price, The Conversation
Google knows if you’re pulling a sickie. Credit: Sergio Alvarez, CC BY-NC-SA

You donate gigabytes of valuable data to Google every day. Your browsing history, search results, and gmail behaviour as well as the countless smartphone apps which monitor your movements and personal relationships all tell the company about you. Now Google X's "moonshot" division is using wearable technology to have healthy volunteers monitored. The idea is to monitor their physiology and sequence their DNA in order to produce a baseline for human health. Is this going a bit too far given how much Google already knows?

Most of us already have an implicit contract with Google. We barter our for services, giving the company access to our online behaviour, which it aggregates and can sell and we agree to be exposed to adverts. In return Google provides us with a variety of services and apps. Which side is getting the better deal is debatable, but as Edward Snowden has taught us, there can be unintended consequences from sharing your data with someone even if they appear to be trustworthy. And while your browsing history might reveal predilections you would prefer not to share with the world, your DNA and physiological responses could embarrass you even more, or cost you dearly.

As little as seven years ago, DNA sequencing cost $10 million per genome but after 2008 the cost fell off a cliff and consumer-level testing kits now cost less than $100. You can learn a lot about yourself and your heritage from a few millilitres of your saliva, including the drugs that will work for you and which might kill you or how likely you are to contract a disease. Some people have used this knowledge to take steps to live longer but it is also knowledge that could be used against you.

We are no longer very far from the kind of dystopian world depicted the film Gattaca, where those with "inferior" genes become second class citizens and are denied insurance or certain jobs. Some insurers already use activity trackers to encourage customers to maintain a healthy lifestyle, but it's not such a giant leap to imagine them requiring customers to monitor themselves with as a condition of insurance.

Although the cost of examining your DNA is now pretty cheap, self-monitoring or "quantified self" technologies are even cheaper, with many working as free . By switching on an app on your phone or putting on one of the many gadgets and wristbands on offer, you could have your activity level tracked so you can get warnings when you start becoming less active and start to put on weight. But with almost all of these gadgets and apps, someone else owns your data (usually in their proprietary data silo) and could potentially use it against you.

So, whether Google tracks you or you track yourself, the privacy deck seems to be stacked against you. Should you still play? My studies have shown that many people get significant insights from things as simple as their activity and sleep data. Having an objective view of yourself and being able to compare it with objective views of others lets you find out how "normal" you are and can help you correct bad habits you didn't know you had. So, yes, I think the game is worth playing but you should know the rules and, like poker, you need to know when to walk away.

Whatever system you use, read the fine print and make sure you can walk away with your own data. If you can only view it in the manufacturer's app or web portal and there is no export feature then try something else. Try to imagine the worst thing that could happen if your data was accidentally made public. If that makes you uncomfortable then consider finding a way to keep your data local to you. You never know when Facebook might buy up your self-tracking provider and find a way to monetise your data for its own gain.

Google's plan to track healthy people certainly has the potential to add a great deal to our medical knowledge and to customise health treatments, so it is worthy of support. We just need to watch the data-collection-creep to make sure that potentially damaging data about us cannot easily fall into the wrong hands.

Explore further: Google Baseline Study aims to define what a healthy human looks like

Related Stories

Researchers find thousands of secret keys in Android apps

June 18, 2014

In a paper presented—and awarded the prestigious Ken Sevcik Outstanding Student Paper Award—at the ACM SIGMETRICS conference on June 18, Jason Nieh, professor of computer science at Columbia Engineering, and PhD candidate ...

Facebook's expands in Zambia

July 31, 2014

(AP)—Facebook's project is taking another step toward its goal of bringing the Internet to people who are not yet online with an app launching Thursday in Zambia.

Recommended for you

Galactic center visualization delivers star power

March 21, 2019

Want to take a trip to the center of the Milky Way? Check out a new immersive, ultra-high-definition visualization. This 360-movie offers an unparalleled opportunity to look around the center of the galaxy, from the vantage ...

Physicists reveal why matter dominates universe

March 21, 2019

Physicists in the College of Arts and Sciences at Syracuse University have confirmed that matter and antimatter decay differently for elementary particles containing charmed quarks.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (1) Jul 31, 2014
Google knows more about you than the NSA ever will, all in the name of marketing. They are the biggest privacy violators in the world and very few countries are doing anything about it.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.