State of the nation's egotism: On the rise for a century

May 6, 2014

Forget the "me" generation. A new analysis of long-term trends in egotism shows there's been a "me" century in America.

The analysis, conducted by researchers at the University of Michigan, shows that characteristics related to self-interest, compared to interest in the lives and needs of other people, was low during the 19th century but rose steadily after the turn of the 20th century.

"We found that self-interest tends to peak after economic booms," said William Chopik, a doctoral candidate in psychology at U-M and first author of the paper just published in the journal Personality and Individual Differences. "In the 20th century, it peaked after World War II and again in the 1970s."

Right after the Great Recession of 2008-09, however, self-interest decreased a bit as judged from the State of the Union addresses delivered by Barack Obama.

"It could be that the challenges facing the country increased the nation's sense of togetherness and focus on the needs of others," Chopik said.

To assess the state of the nation's egotism, Chopik and co-authors Deepti Joshi and Sara Konrath analyzed U.S. presidential State of the Union addresses from 1790 through 2012. They used a text analysis software program called Linguistic and Inquiry Word Count to assess the prevalence of words related to self-interest and other-interest in all available State of the Union addresses.

Soon after America declared independence from Great Britain, egotism was relatively low in the fledgling nation, at least as reflected in the first-ever State of the Union address, delivered by founding father George Washington.

"The focus seemed to be on the needs of other people, rather than on the needs and desires of the president or people close to him," said Sara Konrath, a social psychologist at the U-M Institute for Social Research,

Purely self-interested words included "I, me, mine." Words such as "mother" that referred to immediate family members were considered moderate in self-interest because they overlapped with the self. Purely other-interested words included "his/her" and words such as "neighbor" that referred to community members. As part of the study, the researchers created a historical self-interest index, the Egocentricity Index, which subtracted the other-interested words from the self-interested ones.

The study is the longest temporal analysis of trends in egocentricity to date, situating the recently document rise in narcissism (a form of egotism) among American college students within a longer historical context.

"Not only has self-interest been increasing in the past century or so, but there was a surprisingly long period in U.S. history when the nation was relatively high in other-interest," Joshi said.

So why is America becoming a more egocentric society?

"Historical changes are complex, and it is hard to point a finger at one specific cause," Chopik said. "However, with increasing prosperity for many Americans, there could be more emphasis on 'me, me, me,' with personal needs and desires taking precedence over community needs.

"And there may also be more pressure to succeed over the past couple of centuries. In some ways, we've become a more competitive society, and perhaps what we're seeing in presidential addresses is a reflection of this trend."

But do State of the Union addresses mirror the egocentricity of the electorate or just telegraph the egotism of the Commander in Chief?

"Unfortunately, we have no way of quantifying the of the presidents themselves," Chopik said. "But people generally vote for politicians whose traits most resemble their own, and the content of presidential speeches might well reflect what politicians think the people want to hear."

Explore further: Study finds interest in the goals you pursue can improve your work and reduce burnout

Related Stories

Engineering solutions to society's problems

May 2, 2014

Can engineering help people live better lives? Can it help to preserve our most deeply held values? University of Kentucky researcher Samson Cheung thinks so. He researches how technology can be used to help people in very ...

Recommended for you

Averaging the wisdom of crowds

December 12, 2017

The best decisions are made on the basis of the average of various estimates, as confirmed by the research of Dennie van Dolder and Martijn van den Assem, scientists at VU Amsterdam. Using data from Holland Casino promotional ...

Genetics preserves traces of ancient resistance to Inca rule

December 12, 2017

The Chachapoyas region was conquered by the Inca Empire in the late 15th century. Knowledge of the fate of the local population has been based largely on Inca oral histories, written down only decades later after the Spanish ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.8 / 5 (5) May 06, 2014
This "study" is eminently flawed.
Among other things, the one thing traditional politicians never reveal is their personal feelings.
Also, name one politician, which is synonymous with "millionaire", who ever suffered either during a boom or a "depression". Their opinion is always solely on themselves, during good times or bad.
Which leads to a third fact, namely, political speeches are only ever about spouting propaganda and setting policy, policy which is aimed only at getting the dullard gullible to do what is needed to make the obscenely rich obscenely richer.
If there was any rise in egotism, it was the feelings of the people that molded speeches, rather, it was the speeches that made the morons feel the way the politicos wanted them to feel! During the 29th Century, among other things, politicians used "American exceptionalism" as a "justification" for using the largest army in the world to promote and enforce greedy New World Order machinations.
1 / 5 (2) May 06, 2014
The "study" is flawed for a number of reasons; 1) attempting to quantify egotism from text delivered by politicians, 2) the "researchers" are afflicted by a bias of ignorance, in presuming a) that egotism is a moral quality, rather than a necessary and intrinsic element of human behavior, and b) that egotism is a "bad thing" for society, despite that egotism is the motive force underlying capitalism, the greatest force for economic and thus human progress is history. 3) That the "study" is of 'egotism', rather than 'charity', implies an agenda counter to individualism and for collectivism.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.