After single moms get laid off, their kids may suffer for years

May 2, 2014 by Shelley Wiseman
After single moms get laid off, their kids may suffer for years
UCLA professor Jennie Brand

( —When single mothers lose their jobs, their children suffer significant negative effects as young adults, according to a new study by researchers at the California Center for Population Research at UCLA.

The study focused on two sets of outcomes for the children—educational achievement and social-psychological well-being. Specifically, researchers evaluated whether those in the study had graduated from by age 19, attended college by age 21 and graduated from college by age 25; and whether they exhibited symptoms of depression between the ages of 20 and 24 and between the ages of 25 and 29.

"The findings are alarming, and they suggest we should be doing more to ensure that these children don't get lost in the shuffle," said lead author Jennie Brand, associate director of the research center and associate professor of sociology at UCLA. "Through no fault of their own, they appear to be paying years down the line for their mothers' employment issues."

The study will be published Friday by the American Journal of Sociology.

Analyzing 30 years of data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the researchers compared outcomes in young adulthood for children whose mothers were laid off during the child's first 17 years and children whose mothers were not laid off during that time. The children of mothers who were laid off were 15 percent less likely to complete high school than children whose moms were not laid off. They also were 24 percent less likely to attend college and 33 percent less likely to graduate from college. 

Symptoms of depression were measured according to the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, which asks respondents to categorize how frequently they had a poor appetite, difficulty sleeping, trouble getting motivated and experienced four other symptoms. When children reached their late 20s, those whose mothers had been displaced were significantly more likely to have symptoms of depression compared with the levels expected for children whose mothers had not been displaced.

A theory in the field of childhood development suggests that socioeconomic adversity can have a particularly damaging long-term effect on children if it occurs in early childhood, but the UCLA study found no negative effects among children who were 5 or younger when their moms lost their jobs. 

In fact, the negative effects of the mother's job loss were greatest among older children. Children who were between 12 and 17 when the job loss occurred were 40 percent less likely to graduate from high school, 25 percent less likely to attend college and 45 percent less likely to graduate from college, compared with children whose moms remained employed during that time. Children whose mothers lost jobs when the children were between 12 and 17 years old showed significant in their 20s, but those symptoms were more pronounced in the children's late 20s if their moms were displaced when they were ages 6 to 11.

A single mother's job loss had particularly strong effects on the child if the mother had an otherwise steady job history and didn't expect to lose her job, and if the mother was laid off during a period when the economy was strong. 

Brand said that might be because children whose mothers had unstable employment histories may have viewed the layoff as somewhat less of a shock. "Perhaps greater internalization of blame and social stigma among mothers who hadn't expected to lose their jobs contributes to larger on their children," she said. 

The psychological effects of the recent U.S. recession and the resulting unemployment for millions of workers have been studied extensively, but few studies have considered how a parent's affects children over the long term. Fewer still have considered the effects on children in single-parent households, a group particularly vulnerable to economic shocks. Since at least half of all children spend some portion of their childhoods raised by a single mother, the well-being of single-mother families is a fundamental concern, said Brand, who is on the faculty of UCLA's College of Letters and Science.

The research indicates that employment instability can carry from one generation to the next, Brand said. "Our study shows that the of displaced mothers struggle educationally and psychologically for many years afterward, and thus are themselves more likely to suffer from employment instability."

Brand also said the findings should be a part of the conversation among public policy makers who determine employment assistance and welfare programs. "Debates about social assistance should acknowledge that involuntary job separation among single has significant implications for the next generation," she said.

Explore further: Lack of sleep, stress describe a mother's experience after child's ALL treatment

Related Stories

Grandparents may worsen some moms' baby blues

April 4, 2014

Does living with grandparents ease or worsen a mothers' baby blues? The answer may depend on the mother's marital status, a new study from Duke University suggests.

Kids of single moms who later marry reap few benefits

October 11, 2013

(Medical Xpress)—With roughly four in 10 of all U.S. births now to unwed mothers, a new longitudinal study by Cornell demographers is the first to show that being raised in a single-parent home poses significant risks to ...

Recommended for you

Averaging the wisdom of crowds

December 12, 2017

The best decisions are made on the basis of the average of various estimates, as confirmed by the research of Dennie van Dolder and Martijn van den Assem, scientists at VU Amsterdam. Using data from Holland Casino promotional ...

Genetics preserves traces of ancient resistance to Inca rule

December 12, 2017

The Chachapoyas region was conquered by the Inca Empire in the late 15th century. Knowledge of the fate of the local population has been based largely on Inca oral histories, written down only decades later after the Spanish ...

Violence a matter of scale, not quantity, researchers show

December 11, 2017

Anthropologists have debated for decades whether humans living in tribal communities thousands of years ago were more or less violent than societies today. Researchers at the University of Notre Dame wonder if the question ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) May 02, 2014
Absolute rubbish...

"Brand also said the findings should be a part of the conversation among public policy makers who determine employment assistance and welfare programs. "Debates about social assistance should acknowledge that involuntary job separation among single mothers has significant implications for the next generation," she said.

Maybe the author should actually step into some private and public social service agencies and look at the facts. They are ALREADY "women and children first! women and children first! women and children first!"

here are the actual facts that contribute to why these are single mothers in the first place...

not rated yet May 02, 2014
No, they are paying for society's greed. The greatest input for the GDP is this: an elderly rich man dying of cancer in a hospital private room undergoing his third divorce. All of the tentacles of an economic vampire are wrapped around him.
And we do this every time we support divorce. We pretend that divorce is a financial alternative to all but this is not true. The wealthy can afford 2 or 3 divorces but one destroys the financial stability of a modest family. And our society ignores the result except for lip service from our political talking heads.
not rated yet May 02, 2014
umm, anecdotes can't really be the basis for policy but i do know a guy who was worth over one million who was emptied out by one divorce.

don't marry a lawyer...
not rated yet May 02, 2014
"In my America, an employer can fire you because he doesn't like the color of your hair, or your shirt., etc," paraphrase of Judge Judy.

I guess she never thought that even though that's technically the way it is,it probably should not be that way.

if you get fired because of the color of your t-shirt, the next prospective employer holds that against you, and you don't get hired. Stay out of work long enough, and they start to hold that against you too, even though none of it was your own fault, BUT educated yet clueless people like Judge Judy can't seem to see how UNJUST that system really is, since it contributes to perpetuating a vicious cycle of unemployment and under-employment.

Most full time employed people are forced to plan nearly every aspect of their lives around their job, and even 10 hours per week or more of off-the-job time is actually planned around work too.

Obviously poor income can contribute to poor educational experience, which in turn makes more poor income.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.