Chesapeake Bay impact crater adds to sea level rise

April 27, 2014

Scientists say sea level rise is occurring at a faster pace in the Chesapeake Bay region than the global average, and the dramatic formation of the bay itself is a significant reason why.

About 35 million years ago, a meteorite collided with the Earth near the current location of the mouth of the bay, where it transitions into the Atlantic Ocean. The impact left a crater more than 55 miles wide, setting events into motion that eventually led to the formation of the bay about 3,000 years ago.

When the meteorite hit, it created a giant hole into which loose materials flowed. This replaced harder rock layers from before the impact with much softer, less compacted dirt, said Curt Smith, regional planner for Virginia's Accomack-Northampton Planning District Commission.

Since then, this softer material has slowly compacted together, shifting downward. Because of this, the land near the crater is slowly sinking.

Land around the bay has been slowly sinking for millions of years, but nobody has determined exactly how much of this is due to the crater, said Ward Sanford, a United States Geological Survey hydrologist. Smith said the crater is definitely one reason this area is experiencing the fastest rates of relative rise on the East Coast.

Relative sea level rise, which takes both rising sea levels and sinking land into account, averaged 3.9 millimeters per year, according to USGS data collected from four stations in the southern Chesapeake Bay until 2006. The global average sea level rise is 1.8 millimeters per year, according to a USGS report released in December.

Another effect that can contribute to is the withdrawal of underground water supplies. If the amount of groundwater decreases, the weight of above the groundwater compacts softer layers downward, Sanford said. This can amount to centimeters of change over decades.

About 80 percent of sinking land nationwide is caused by groundwater withdrawals, according to USGS data.

Smith said the crater also appears to have influenced the path of the James River and other rivers near where they meet the outer rim of the crater.

The crater was discovered relatively recently. But many others came across hints of its presence long before geologists Scott Bruce, David Powars and their colleagues helped piece together the hints to reveal the crater. Bruce and Powars wrote an article for Virginia Explorer in 2000 about the history of these accidental interactions with the crater.

In 1864, Union soldiers at Fort Monroe near the mouth of the James River drilled a 907-foot well that drew salty water from inside the crater. More wells were drilled and more studies of groundwater supplies and other subsurface characteristics were done over the next decades. But Powars - working for USGS at the time - Bruce - then a groundwater geologist with the Virginia State Water Control Board - and their colleagues didn't get close to the discovery until 1986.

"On a hot August night, Don Queen (USGS driller) and Jay Owens (SWCB assistant driller) extruded a section of core that resembled none other taken in Virginia," Powars and Bruce wrote in the Virginia Explorer article. "The next day, in better daylight, Powers, Bruce, and Steve Schindler puzzled over the atypical composition of the core. At one point, David Powars jokingly commented, 'Wouldn't it be cool if this was from a meteor impact?' Everyone roared with laughter."

Later, Powars got seismic data of the bay region from Texaco in 1993 that showed evidence of the crater, supporting the theory of a meteor impact.

Although hints of the crater had been discovered since as early as 1864, it wasn't until the Texaco data was analyzed that the 's existence was definitively confirmed.

"Any time you come up with something new and they all think 'how could you possibly know?' they laugh at you," Powars said. "When I got the eureka point, once I had figured that out, I knew I could defend it against anybody."

Explore further: Research shows the North Atlantic became less salty as it grew

Related Stories

Sea-level study brings good and bad news to Chesapeake Bay

December 21, 2010

A new study of local sea-level trends by researchers at the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS) brings both good and bad news to localities concerned with coastal inundation and flooding along the shores of Chesapeake ...

Traces of recent water on Mars

April 25, 2014

New research has shown that there was liquid water on Mars as recently as 200,000 years ago. The results have been published in Icarus ( International Journal for Solar System Studies). "We have discovered a very young crater ...

Image: Mars rover Curiosity scoping out next study area

April 4, 2014

( —On Wednesday, NASA's Curiosity Mars rover drove the last 98 feet feet (30 meters) needed to arrive at a site planned since early 2013 as a destination for studying rock clues about ancient environments that ...

Recommended for you


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Apr 27, 2014
I need help here. If land is sinking then the ocean would encroach further inland. How is land sinking making the level of the sea rising elsewhere?
5 / 5 (3) Apr 28, 2014
According to readily available charts the sea/bay level of the Chesapeake has been rising at roughly 3 to 3.5 mm per year for about 9,000 years or so. Half is generally attributed to the ocean's rise and half to the subsidence of the eastern edge of the continent. Prior to 9,000 years ago, the level was rising considerable faster, following the end of the glacial maximum. This report was the first I've seen to say it's rising at 3.8 per year.
5 / 5 (1) Apr 29, 2014
Idiot story - the land subsiding, is NOT massive local global warming caused sea level rise.

Where is global warming mentioned in the article?
5 / 5 (1) Apr 29, 2014
I need help here. If land is sinking then the ocean would encroach further inland. How is land sinking making the level of the sea rising elsewhere?

Where does the article say the land sinking in Chesapeake Bay is causing rising sea levels elsewhere?

Wow. How people get so confused while reading such a short article is a mystery to me.
5 / 5 (1) May 02, 2014
The article says land is sinking. Sea level rise is due to ocean density decreasing (thermal expansion) and icecap melting?
not rated yet May 07, 2014
"Global Sea level rise" is not a local phenomenon. Subsidence is *always* a local phenomenon. The only sea level records we have are local.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.