The scientific explanation of why beer overflows when a one bottle is bumped against another

January 20, 2014, Carlos III University of Madrid
The scientific explanation of why beer overflows when a one bottle is bumped against another

Scientists at Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (UC3M) reveal the physical phenomenon that explains beer's rapid transformation from a liquid to a foamy state as the result of an impact. This research has applications in the area of naval engineering or in studies related to the prediction of gases in volcanic eruptions.

The idea for this research came about at the bar of a tavern when it was observed that the foam of one beer spilled over when somebody jokingly hit the neck of one bottle against the base of another, the researchers confess. "We all began to propose hypotheses and theories about the cause of the phenomenon, but none of them convinced us, so we decided to take it to the laboratory to do research using controlled experiments in well-defined conditions to analyze which physical phenomena are behind the appearance of that foam," comments Javier Rodríguez, a professor in UC3M's Department of Thermal and Fluids Engineering, who has presented a preliminary report on the study's results at the American Physics Society's most recent annual conference on fluid mechanics, the most prestigious conference on in the world.

This study, carried out in collaboration with the Institute Jean le Rond D'Alembert and the Université Pierre et Marie Curie, in France, explains in detail what happens after a bottle receives an impact. It is a process with three well-defined phases. First, expansion and compression waves appear. These advance inside the liquid and cause the gas cavities (bubbles) to burst at the bottom of the bottle. Afterwards, small balls of foam are formed because the bubbles break into even smaller ones. Finally, given that they weigh less than the liquid surrounding them, these bubbles move to the surface so rapidly that the final result is similar to an explosion. "In fact," comments Rodríguez, "those clouds of foam are very much like the mushroom cloud caused by a nuclear explosion." In one second, almost all of the beer shoots out of the bottle.

The foam appears because, in carbonated beverages, there is more carbon dioxide (CO2) than the water (the main component) is able to maintain in the solution. "Usually, the CO2 escapes very slowly. But the chain of events set off by the blow to the bottle multiplies the escape of gas by a very high factor: a bottle may lose in seconds the same amount of gas that it would normally lose in hours if we simply left the bottle open on the table," explains Javier Rodríguez.

In order to demonstrate the validity of their theory, the first version of which has already been published in Arxiv, the researchers came up with a system for studying the phenomenon in slow motion. First, they aimed at the base of the bottle with a high energy pulsed laser to cause a bubble to appear. Then they hit the neck of the bottle and recorded everything with a high-speed camera that allowed them to obtain over 50000 still photos per second. Because of this, they were able to describe in detail the process that is behind this chain reaction: cavitation. This is a hydrodynamic affect that is similar to boiling (as far as the formation of bubbles is concerned), but which occurs when the pressure in a liquid drops.

Far from being just an interesting trick, this research may have very serious applications. "One of applications is the prediction of the quantity of gasses produced by the eruption of a volcano," indicates another of the researchers, Daniel Fuster, of the Institute D'Alembert. In fact, in 1986, Lake Nyos in Cameroon, which lies on top of a volcano, released between 100,000 and 300,000 tons of CO2 in an explosion-like phenomenon. The gas expanded at a speed of 100 km/h, expelling the oxygen in a 25-kilometer radius, causing 1,700 fatalities among the population and killing thousands of animals due to asphyxiation.

Understanding the phenomenon of cavitation may lead to the improvement in the design of boat propellers (which are highly exposed to erosion caused by ), to the optimization of the protection of structures from explosions or certain shock waves, or it may favor chemical reactions through bubble implosion, point out the researchers. "This is one of the great advantages of basic research," concludes Rodríguez. "You learn low-cost physics in the laboratory, with systems that are as simple as a of beer, and this can later help you to understand and attempt to solve other important problems."

This video is in Spanish.

Explore further: The physics of beer tapping

More information: Why does a beer bottle foam up after a sudden impact on its mouth? Javier Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Almudena Casado, Daniel Fuster arXiv:1310.3747 [physics.flu-dyn]. Submitted on 14 Oct 2013.

Related Stories

The physics of beer tapping

November 24, 2013

An old, hilarious if somewhat juvenile party trick involves covertly tapping the top of someone's newly opened beer bottle and then standing back as the suds foam out onto the floor.

The indiscretions of a champagne bubble paparazzi

February 14, 2012

The innermost secrets of champagne bubbles are about to be unveiled in the Springer journal European Physical Journal ST. This fascinating work is the brainchild of Gérard Liger-Belair, a scientist tackling champagne ...

Levitating foam liquid under the spell of magnetic fields

November 11, 2013

Foams fascinate, partly due to their short lifespan. Foams change as fluid drains out of their structure over time. It is precisely their ephemeral nature which has, until now, prevented scientists from experimentally probing ...

Clues to foam formation could help find oil

October 8, 2013

Blowing bubbles in the backyard is one thing and quite another when searching for oil. That distinction is at the root of new research by Rice University scientists who describe in greater detail than ever precisely how those ...

Recommended for you

Topological quantities flow

January 14, 2019

Topology is an emerging field within many scientific disciplines, even leading to a Nobel Physics Prize in 2016. Leiden physicist Marcello Caio and his colleagues have now discovered the existence of topological currents ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (3) Jan 20, 2014
Overemployment of physicists and the lack of public control over quality of their work. That is to say, there is lotta work about research of cold fusion, magnetic motors and similar stuffs - but its results would make the jobs of another physicists in another areas useless, so they're ignored on behalf of another wasteful research. In this way the overemployment propagates in self-reinforcing avalanche-like way.
Whydening Gyre
5 / 5 (2) Jan 20, 2014
I believe the relevancy of it was kinda stated in the first paragraph. As to the wasted tax dollar question - I think Spain uses the Euro, making the issue non sequitur.
Whydening Gyre
5 / 5 (2) Jan 20, 2014
This could also have relevance in studies of oceanic co2 sequestration, as well. Tremors, earthquakes causes the same effect in water, effecting the how co2 and methane are release from the oceanic sinks.
It appears to be a faculty sanctioned study by students as a beginning learning tool for bigger things.
5 / 5 (1) Jan 21, 2014
Another one of those articles which bespeaks the question "Why are we wasting tax dollars on such silly research?"

Only if you are in the habit of spewing rhetoric.

There was no mention of what it cost, let alone the source of the funding.

The article did a good job of explaining several potential practical uses of this knowledge.

It wouldn't be surprising if many good ideas start out this way. If the authors of those ideas had to provide rationale up front, none would reach fruition.

I imagine if the likes of you were at the head of some research group, you'd quickly lose your brightest minds. And quickly gain a reputation for accomplishing little.
vlaaing peerd
not rated yet Jan 27, 2014
Another one of those articles which bespeaks the question "Why are we wasting tax dollars on such silly research?"

- the Microwave oven was invented because a certain Mr Spencer wondered why his chocolate bar melted in the vicinity of a high energy radar.
- Newton theorized gravity because he wondered why apples fall from trees (ok, popular myth).
- The Casimir force was theorized because Casimir was wondering why mayonaise was so liquid yet remained sticky all the time.

These all seem to be trivial matter and perhaps to you not worthwhile questioning or researching, but if one observes something unusual that doesn't behave to the laws we know, there must be something going on. And it doesn't matter if that is a star exploding or a bottle of beer foaming.

If you bespeak the question, are you here to inform yourself of science news or only to complain about your tax dollars?
Jan 27, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.