US, partners must 'renounce' spy tactics: climate activists

January 31, 2014
Danish Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen delivers a speech on December 7, 2009 during the opening ceromony of the 15th session of the COP15 Climate Talks

The United States and other governments accused of spying on negotiators at crucial UN climate talks in 2009 should "publicly renounce" such tactics, environmental groups involved in the process said Friday.

Climate Action Network (CAN), a grouping of more than 850 environmental groups, reacted to media reports citing a leaked document from rogue US National Security Agency analyst Edward Snowden claiming to show the NSA and allies had monitored the communications of other governments ahead of and during the 2009 round of talks in Copenhagen.

"CAN condemns such actions," said the grouping, an active participant in the annual talks towards sealing a new, global pact to curb Earth-damaging climate change.

"The work currently underway... already suffers from a dearth of trust between nations. If we are to achieve this monumental deal for the planet, all countries must work on repairing these burnt bridges."

The Snowden document, carried by online news site the Huffington Post, states: "Analysts here at NSA, as well as our Second Party partners, will continue to provide policymakers with unique, timely, and valuable insights into key countries' preparations and goals for the conference.

"While the outcome of the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference remains uncertain, signals intelligence will undoubtedly play a significant role in keeping our negotiators as well informed as possible throughout the two-week event."

According to the Huffington Post, these "Second Party partners" were the intelligence agencies of Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

The document was dated December 7, 2009—the first day of two weeks of fraught negotiations.

"The countries who have been accused of spying, including the US, UK, Canada and Australia, are among those who have done the most to cause the , and can also be leaders in delivering solutions," the CAN said in a statement.

"But we need a radical shift in ambition and trust to tackle the planetary emergency."

The world's nations have committed to signing a by next year on curbing Earth-warming greenhouse gas emissions, to take effect by 2020.

The previous attempt to conclude such a worldwide climate deal was the Copenhagen meeting, which ended in a near-fiasco without a formal agreement.

The United States, the world's second-biggest carbon emitter after China, is opposed to any kind of a pact that imposes targets on individual nations for curbing .

Explore further: Clock ticking on 2015 climate talks deal: EU

Related Stories

Clock ticking on 2015 climate talks deal: EU

September 6, 2013

Countries around the world need to act with a sense of urgency if the 2015 UN climate change talks on cutting emissions are to have a credible outcome, a top EU official warned Friday.

Final push in troubled UN climate talks

November 22, 2013

Bleary-eyed ministers began a final push on Friday to lay the groundwork at UN climate talks in Warsaw for a new, global deal to stave off planetary disaster.

Aim for carbon-neutral 2050, 'Elders' group says

January 24, 2014

A panel of senior statesmen known as the Elders on Friday called for renewed efforts to conclude a world climate pact by the end of 2015 and appealed for a "carbon-neutral" planet by 2050.

Recommended for you

Mystery solved for mega-avalanches in Tibet

January 23, 2018

An international scientific effort determined the cause of a highly unusual and deadly glacier avalanche in Tibet in 2016, a new Nature Geoscience paper says.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

The Shootist
2.3 / 5 (6) Jan 31, 2014
climate activists

Watermelons, by any other name, would be as totalitarian.
4 / 5 (4) Jan 31, 2014
Shootist, by any definition, remains a troll on climate related articles.


One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument.

Why don't you find something constructive to comment on Trollist?
2 / 5 (4) Jan 31, 2014
Constructive researchers study future methods of CO2 conversion and other technologies which improve our life. On the other hand, activist scientists are parasites who contribute nothing to civilization progress. And they dare to demand something from the government that provided grants for their junk science?
vlaaing peerd
not rated yet Feb 03, 2014
so, this must be the GW deniers' conspiracy theories they all been rattling about? if any, US government and lobbies are more interested in breaking down any climate debate rather than supporting it.

It was so during Bush, Kyoto, Kopenhagen and probably still today.

So who is "secretly funding" those pesky climate scientists?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.