Feds kill 26 barred owls to help spotted owl

December 20, 2013 by Jeff Barnard
This June 7, 2011 file photo shows a barred owl at the Miami Science Museum in Miami. An experiment to see if killing invasive barred owls will help the threatened Northern spotted owl reverse its decline toward extinction is underway in the forests of Northern California. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said Friday, Dec. 20, 2013, that specially trained biologists have shot 26 barred owls in a study area on the Hoopa Valley Indian Reservation located northeast of Arcata, Calif. They plan to remove as many as 118. (AP Photo/Wilfredo Lee, File)

An experiment to see if killing invasive barred owls will help the threatened northern spotted owl reverse its decline toward extinction is underway in the forests of Northern California.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said Friday that specially trained biologists have shot 26 in a study area on the Hoopa Valley Indian Reservation, northeast of Arcata, Calif. They plan to remove as many as 118.

The service is spending $3.5 million over six years to remove 3,600 barred owls from sites in Oregon, Washington and California. Barred owls migrated from the East in the 1950s and have become the single biggest threat to spotted owl survival.

Scientists want to see if spotted owls will increase when competition from the more aggressive barred owl is eliminated.

Explore further: US advances plan to kill barred owls in Northwest

Related Stories

US advances plan to kill barred owls in Northwest

July 24, 2013

(AP)—Federal wildlife officials plan to dispatch armed bird specialists into forests of the Pacific Northwest starting this fall to shoot one species of owl to protect another that is threatened with extinction.

SF State scientists expose new threat to spotted owl

May 28, 2008

A new study provides a baseline distribution of blood parasites and strains in Spotted Owls, suggesting a more fragile immune health than previously understood for the already threatened Northern and California Spotted Owls.

Obama plan for spotted owl targets rival bird

February 28, 2012

(AP) -- To save the imperiled spotted owl, the Obama administration is moving forward with a controversial plan to shoot barred owls, a rival bird that has shoved its smaller cousin aside.

Unusual number of Arctic snowy owls seen in US

December 5, 2013

Snow-white owls with luminous yellow eyes are thrilling bird-watchers as the magnificent Arctic birds set up winter residence at airports, fields and beaches in the United States far south of their normal range.

Recommended for you

Mating induces sexual inhibition in female jumping spiders

October 18, 2017

After mating for the first time, most females of an Australian jumping spider are unreceptive to courtship by other males, and this sexual inhibition is immediate and often lasts for the rest of their lives, according to ...

Understanding the coevolving web of life as a network

October 18, 2017

Coevolution, which occurs when species interact and adapt to each other, is often studied in the context of pair-wise interactions between mutually beneficial symbiotic partners. But many species have mutualistic interactions ...

8 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Xyberman
2.3 / 5 (3) Dec 20, 2013
So it is better to spend nearly a $1000 per bird for "specially trained biologists" to go hunting than to charge a hunting enthusiast for a special permit to hunt these birds. By the way, when did it become more sensible to kill one species to protect another?
pepe2907
3.4 / 5 (5) Dec 21, 2013
So, evolution /driven by natural selection/ is not allowed anymore? :)
Sinister1812
not rated yet Dec 21, 2013
Native species can become invasive in new areas too.
Sinister1812
5 / 5 (1) Dec 21, 2013
By the way, when did it become more sensible to kill one species to protect another?


When a species becomes invasive, why shouldn't they take measures to protect local species at risk of extinction?
ryggesogn2
2.3 / 5 (3) Dec 21, 2013
By the way, when did it become more sensible to kill one species to protect another?


When a species becomes invasive, why shouldn't they take measures to protect local species at risk of extinction?

It violates nature.
TheGhostofOtto1923
3 / 5 (6) Dec 21, 2013
By the way, when did it become more sensible to kill one species to protect another?


When a species becomes invasive, why shouldn't they take measures to protect local species at risk of extinction?

It violates nature.
No, we violate nature. Because of our activity, we must assume that the natural state no longer exists anywhere. Evolution is over. The planet therefore must now be managed like a park.

Further, species all have the potential to further our knowledge and provide real benefits in medicine and technology and so should be preserved at all costs.
Doug_Huffman
2.3 / 5 (3) Dec 21, 2013
Affirmative Action (or is it A. Reaction?) writ small.
Noumenon
1 / 5 (2) Dec 25, 2013
This sounds like ObamaCare for animals.

So, evolution /driven by natural selection/ is not allowed anymore? :)


If liberals were around during evolution, they would have regulated it as 'unfair', like they view capitalism, and killed off life on the planet, like their mentality threatens to do to economies.

No, we violate nature. Because of our activity, we must assume that the natural state no longer exists anywhere.


Either humans are animals also and who's existence and activity is thus natural as well, or we are not. Which is it?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.