Researchers find animals that evolve to have no stomach have same missing genes

December 4, 2013 by Bob Yirka report
Platypus skeleton at Melbourne Museum. Credit: Peter Halasz/Wikipedia.

( —A small team of international researchers has found that every type of jawed vertebrate they tested that has over time lost its stomach to evolution, such as chimaeras, numerous teleosts, lungfish and the platypus, also has the same missing genes. In their paper published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, the team describes their investigation into the genes of stomach-less vertebrates and it appears that they all lost the genes necessary for bringing them back should the need arise.

The , as most are aware, is the place food winds up after being eaten. Inside of it, along with food and bacterial biota are pepsins which help break down proteins, along with acids that soften food to make it easier to digest. Both pepsins and acids exist because of characteristics within our genome. Without them, we'd die. But not all vertebrates have stomachs or some other similar organ to serve as a vessel for the dispersal of pepsins and digestive acids. This got the researchers to wondering if the responsible for causing the creation of them might have gone away as well. To find out, they studied 14 species of both with and without stomachs to see what differences they might have. More specifically, they checked to see if there were any differences in their genes.

As it turned, out, there were such differences. Every single one of the stomach-less creatures was missing the genes responsible for the production of pepsins and . This, the researchers note, means that such animals could not re-evolve a stomach should the need arise—they'd have to start from scratch, a much lengthier process.

Other animals, the team notes, have also lost other parts to evolution, but have retained the genes responsible for their creation. Thus, if conditions change, all that's needed is for a marker to be turned back on for those parts to return. In the case of the animals that have lost the genes, the researchers theorize that it might have come about as a way to recover the energy lost in conserving such genes.

Next up for the researchers will be a new study to try to determine if there is a missing link in some animal—one that has devolved a stomach but still has the genes to go back if necessary.

Explore further: Are crocodiles secret fruit-lovers?

More information: Recurrent gene loss correlates with the evolution of stomach phenotypes in gnathostome history, Published 4 December 2013 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2669

The stomach, a hallmark of gnathostome evolution, represents a unique anatomical innovation characterized by the presence of acid- and pepsin-secreting glands. However, the occurrence of these glands in gnathostome species is not universal; in the nineteenth century the French zoologist Cuvier first noted that some teleosts lacked a stomach. Strikingly, Holocephali (chimaeras), dipnoids (lungfish) and monotremes (egg-laying mammals) also lack acid secretion and a gastric cellular phenotype. Here, we test the hypothesis that loss of the gastric phenotype is correlated with the loss of key gastric genes. We investigated species from all the main gnathostome lineages and show the specific contribution of gene loss to the widespread distribution of the agastric condition. We establish that the stomach loss correlates with the persistent and complete absence of the gastric function gene kit—H+/K+-ATPase (Atp4A and Atp4B) and pepsinogens (Pga, Pgc, Cym)—in the analysed species. We also find that in gastric species the pepsinogen gene complement varies significantly (e.g. two to four in teleosts and tens in some mammals) with multiple events of pseudogenization identified in various lineages. We propose that relaxation of purifying selection in pepsinogen genes and possibly proton pump genes in response to dietary changes led to the numerous independent events of stomach loss in gnathostome history. Significantly, the absence of the gastric genes predicts that reinvention of the stomach in agastric lineages would be highly improbable, in line with Dollo's principle.

Related Stories

Are crocodiles secret fruit-lovers?

November 12, 2013

Seed dispersal by animals is important for plants to help them occupy new areas of land. Usually bugs, birds, or intrepid kittens do that job. Now we can add crocodiles to that list. A new study reviewed the diets of crocodiles ...

Obese stomachs tell us diets are doomed to fail

September 16, 2013

The way the stomach detects and tells our brains how full we are becomes damaged in obese people but does not return to normal once they lose weight, according to new research from the University of Adelaide.

Strange worm reveals the evolution of digestion

October 26, 2012

A Swedish–Norwegian research team shows in a new study that the intestines of the peculiar Penis worm develop in the same way as those in humans, fish and starfish. This surprising discovery shows that stomachs of very ...

Experts identify critical genes mutated in stomach cancer

April 8, 2012

An international team of scientists, led by researchers from the Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School (Duke-NUS) in Singapore and National Cancer Centre of Singapore, has identified hundreds of novel genes that are mutated in ...

Recommended for you

Cell fate regulation by LIN41 determined by binding location

January 20, 2017

Helge Großhans and his group at the Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research (FMI) have elucidated the mode of action of the RNA-binding protein and stem cell factor LIN41. In an animal model, they showed that ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.