When the Sahara turned to sand

November 11, 2013, Columbia University
When the Sahara turned to sand
In analyzing the above sediment core, deMenocal and Tierney found that north Africa’s climate about 5,000 years ago dried out in as little as 100 to 200 years.

The Sahara wasn't always a desert. Trees and grasslands dominated the landscape from roughly 10,000 years ago to 5,000 years ago. Then, abruptly, the climate changed, and north Africa began to dry out.

Previous research has suggested that the end of the African Humid Period came gradually, over thousands of years, but a study published last month in Science says it took just a few hundred. The shift was initially triggered by more sunlight falling on Earth's , as Earth's cyclic orientation toward the sun changed. But how that orbital change caused North Africa to dry out so fast– in 100 to 200 years, says the study– is a matter of debate.

Two feedback mechanisms have been proposed. In the first, as the climate gets warmer and drier, trees give way to sparser vegetation, making the now barren region warmer and drier, causing more vegetation to wither. The explanation favored by the authors–climate scientists Jessica Tierney, at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, and Peter deMenocal, at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory–is that shifting sea-surface temperatures in the Indian Ocean reduced rainfall over east Africa.

The study puts the dawn of the Egyptian state, at about 5,000 years ago, into context and suggests that feedback mechanisms could cause similar rainfall switches in north Africa and other regions as humans continue to heat the planet. "It's evidence that climate doesn't respond gradually to gradual forcing," deMenocal told The Atlantic.

The study is also one of the few climate reconstructions to have come out of the region recently. One of the crucial sediment cores was recovered in 2001 aboard a Dutch research ship in the Gulf of Aden a couple of months before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, just before a major surge of terrorism, political unrest and piracy largely placed the Horn of Africa off-limits to scientists.

Even then, pirates were already a danger, deMenocal explains in the video above. Lamont's own research ship, the Maurice Ewing, had been attacked with rocket-propelled grenades a few months before. To avoid detection, the captain shut off the ship's radar, radio and navigation lights as they sailed along the coasts of Somalia and Yemen. By fax, the ship received updates of known pirate attacks, some near sites they had planned to core. But they got their core and eventually docked safely in Egypt.

Explore further: Study provides new insights on drought predictions in East Africa

Related Stories

Plant diversity may affect climate–vegetation interaction

October 7, 2013

In a new study, published in Nature Geoscience, Prof. Dr. Martin Claussen, director of the department "The Land in the Earth System" at the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI-M) and Chair of the Cluster of Excellence ...

Recommended for you


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (4) Nov 11, 2013
Sounds like the makings of an Indiana Jones movie. Indiana Jones and the Pirates of Somalia.
1 / 5 (7) Nov 11, 2013
Indiana Jones and the Queen of de Nile.
2.3 / 5 (6) Nov 11, 2013
That would have provided the force to resettle the populations of the Sahara area....Hunger! They became driven to agriculture because all the animals were dead, the plants were dying in the bush, and raising their own food in the only river system that still had water was the only way to survive.
1 / 5 (5) Nov 15, 2013
Damn that Tut and his SUV-driving slaves.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.