Study evaluates exposure, adaptation to how climate change affects North American rangelands

October 11, 2013 by Blair Fannin, Texas A&M University

( —A group of eight U.S. scientists, including Texas A&M University's Dr. David Briske and Dr. Bruce McCarl, recently published two assessments that identify trends and projections for rangeland effects of climate change and evaluate adaptation strategies.

"These papers offer an objective, comprehensive assessment of climate trends and contingency planning as it relates to North American rangelands," said Briske, a professor in the department of ecosystem and science management at Texas A&M.

Changes in mean climatic trend and increased variability will affect the ability of rangelands to provide and support human livelihoods, but in varied and geographically specific ways, Briske said.

Climate models project that the U.S. Southwest and Southern Plains will become warmer and drier. The Northwest will become warmer and drier during summer and experience less snowpack in winter. The northern United States and southern Canada are projected to become warmer and wetter.

"Such developments will affect rangeland enterprises and productivity," said McCarl, a Texas A&M AgriLife Research economist.

The interacting effects of atmospheric warming, increased carbon dioxide concentrations, and modified precipitation patterns will modify fire regimes, soil carbon content, and forage quantity and quality, according to the scientists. This will, in turn, affect livestock production, plant community composition, and the distribution of plant, animals, and diseases.

Human actions to minimize negative impacts and to capture potential opportunities need to be geographically specific to effectively contend with these varied consequences, according to the authors. The study authors also indicate that specific actions to increase carbon sequestration are not an economically viable mitigation strategy because carbon uptake is limited by low and variable precipitation.

However, they concluded, numerous adaptation strategies, including changing perceptions of risk, greater flexibility in production systems and policy changes to emphasize climatic variability rather than consistency will prove highly valuable.

Livestock production systems also will need to adjust as a result of changing environmental conditions, according to the scientists. Some of the adaptations specific to livestock production may include flexible herd management, alternative livestock breeds or species, innovative pest management, modified enterprise structures and, in extreme cases, relocation. Increasing awareness of and preparedness for changing climatic trends and increasing climatic variability will promote both the supply of ecosystem services and the maintenance of human livelihoods in future climates.

Full text of the articles, "Climate Change and North American Rangelands: Trends, Projections, and Implications" and "Climate Change and North American Rangelands: Assessment of Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies" appears in Rangeland Ecology and Management, Vol. 66, No. 5, 2013, or online at

Explore further: Research shows how natural disturbances affect climate change response strategies

Related Stories

Climate scientists see better climate models, warmer future

September 30, 2013

( —Over the next century, most of the continents are on track to become considerably warmer, with more hot extremes and fewer cold extremes. Precipitation will increase in some parts of the world but will decrease ...

Finding new forages for rangeland cattle

January 25, 2012

( -- Cattle that graze on rangelands in the western United States may soon have a new forage option, thanks to work by a U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) scientist.

Recommended for you

Ocean acidification may reduce sea scallop fisheries

September 21, 2018

Each year, fishermen harvest more than $500 million worth of Atlantic sea scallops from the waters off the east coast of the United States. A new model created by scientists at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (14) Oct 11, 2013
I'm a denier now because I've seen for myself that the consensus the scientists had was just that it "could be" not "WILL be" a crisis and it's been 30 years of "maybe" so it's safe to say it "won't be" a crisis. I need a real warning for a real crisis in order to condemn my own kids.
The question is; why did we say a crisis WILL happen when science agreed on nothing beyond "could be"?
Consensus: "Climate change is real and is happening and could lead to a climate crisis of unstoppable warming." They have never agreed on anything beyond "could be" and have never agreed or said any crisis was; "Inevitable" or "eventual" or "unavoidable" etc. Prove me wrong.
1 / 5 (12) Oct 12, 2013
Models, such prophets, why do they continue to blaspheme with models?
Models are not required for prophesy. The truth is observable.
I wonder if their model is not simply to observe the rouge scriptures presented in this @physorg blog.
It seems I have read those prophesies here from some contributor.
--and these prophesies seem reasonable to anyone who would observe the Water as a diviner.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.