Environmental risks of pipeline underestimated

July 29, 2013, University of New South Wales
Environmental risks of pipeline underestimated
View of the Macquarie River below the proposed pump site to Orange.

A new UNSW-led study modelling the impacts of an approved $47 million pipeline pumping water from the Macquarie River to the city of Orange reveals far greater risks to river health than those estimated by the environmental assessment.  

The pipeline, which will cost a further $728,000 per year to operate, was approved by the NSW Department of Planning and Infrastructure in May and the Planning Assessment Commission in June. However, UNSW scientists say there were critical flaws in the original environmental assessment.

"The original environmental assessment was based on dry and the wrong pumping thresholds and there is increased opportunity to divert even more in the future," says Professor Richard Kingsford, Director of the Australian Wetlands, Rivers and Landscapes Centre at UNSW.

Kingsford and his honours student Justin McCann independently modelled the impact of the pipeline on downstream flows to the river and Macquarie Marshes – which are listed by the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance. They identified "critical issues of inadequate environmental assessment".

Key findings:

  • The initial assessment said pumping could occur when flow levels were above 38 mega litres per day (ML/day). This is considerably lower than the 118 ML/day threshold identified by UNSW researchers.
  • The UNSW model closely reflected an independent assessment commissioned by the NSW Department of Planning and Infrastructure, which recommended 108 ML/day.
  • Current approval of the pipeline with a new pumping threshold of 108 ML/day has not had its environmental impact assessed.
  • An upper threshold would not prevent increased water diversions. Enlarging the capacity of dams at Orange (e.g. Suma Park Dam or use of groundwater aquifer for storage) would considerably increase future diversions of water, inadequately accounted for in the environmental assessment.
  • There is significant potential to increase the maximum amount of water diverted from 3804 ML per year to 4380 ML per year, by varying pumping thresholds.

"Our modelling identified the pumping thresholds were wrong, which was further supported by a government-commissioned assessment. What this means is that the approval is based on new thresholds which have never been properly assessed," says McCann. "The original environmental assessment has underestimated the ecological impact of this development."  

Furthermore, Professor Kingsford says there's a loop hole in the water planning that will allow increased diversions of water from "one of the most seriously compromised rivers in the Murray Darling Basin".

"This assumes there is spare water where there is none. The Macquarie Marshes have suffered for more than forty years from diversions of water upstream for irrigation and towns. This is just another blow to its life-giving water supply," said Professor Kingsford.

The Australian Government is expected to make a decision on its under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 in the coming weeks, with a particular focus on the impacts the development will have on the internationally recognised Macquarie Marshes.

Explore further: Dam risk to Murray-Darling wetlands may be underestimated

More information: www.wetrivers.unsw.edu.au/2013 … ne_Report/index.html

Related Stories

Dam risk to Murray-Darling wetlands may be underestimated

June 7, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Computer modelling used to develop the Murray-Darling Basin Plan may have significantly underestimated the effects of building dams and diverting water on the internationally listed Macquarie Marshes wetlands, ...

Damage to farms minimal under Basin plan

October 24, 2012

For the first time, scientists at UNSW have investigated the likely impact of planned environmental flows on farmlands and nature reserves around the Murray-Darling Basin.

Rivers buckle under pressure from climate, dams

March 21, 2011

Climate change is likely to intensify the alarming rate of degradation of the world’s rivers and wetlands unless water resources are better managed, according to a special issue of the international scientific journal ...

Oil spill sullies river in Ecuador

June 3, 2013

A Petroecuador pipeline ruptured in Ecuador's Amazon basin region, spilling 10,000 barrels of crude into a river and alarming locals left without fresh well water, authorities said Monday.

New river setbacks 'a setback to environment'

March 15, 2013

Researchers from Macquarie University and RMIT have warned about potential major damage to the long-term health of rivers and the local environment following recent changes to New South Wales Government planning rules around ...

Recommended for you

How the Elwha dam removals changed the river's mouth

January 19, 2018

For decades, resource managers agreed that removing the two dams on the Elwha River would be a big win for the watershed as a whole and, in particular, for its anadromous trout and salmon. The dams sat on the river for more ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.