PMQs more 'please and thank you' than 'Punch and Judy'

May 1, 2013

The Punch and Judy politics image of Prime Minister's Questions is not an accurate one, according to a University of Manchester linguist.

From his analysis of randomly chosen PMQs sessions, James Murphy says a significant minority of opposition MPs speak politely at Prime Minister's Questions.

When David Cameron and Gordon Brown were at the helm, he finds, backbenchers in the governing party were polite 80 per cent of the time, while the figure for those in opposition was 16 per cent – much higher than anticipated.

"PMQs is known for its knockabout adversarial style, but this is only true up to a point," he said.

"It seems that MPs on all sides of the house realise that being polite is more likely to elicit a favourable response from the PM – and that means it's easier to get things done."

is also a feature of the responses given by both Gordon Brown and David Cameron. While the of Brown may be that he is abrupt, a more of the data suggests a different side to him.

The PhD researcher based in the University's School of Arts, Languages and said: "At PMQs, both Brown and Cameron are, unsurprisingly, unfailingly polite when answering their own MPs. To do otherwise may indicate a rift within the party.

"In response to questions which are worded in a neutral way, Brown answers consistently politely.

"Cameron, in contrast, answers impolitely on around a half of occasions. This suggests a mismatch between Brown's linguistic performance at PMQs and the public's perception of him."

According to Murphy, the way MPs ask questions is not so different from the way we interact on a day to day basis, where even the most innocuous of questions has the potential to have an impact on our .

One of the reasons PMQs is viewed as highly confrontational, he says, is that the exchanges between the Leader of the Opposition and the Prime Minister receive by far the most attention.

He said: "The Leader of the Opposition asks questions impolitely 85% of the time. Part of the reason for this is that impoliteness makes the criticism of the Prime Minister and his government more prominent.

"There are, however, times when the Leader of the Opposition asks questions politely. This is usually to ask questions on a 'serious' topic, such as the situation in Afghanistan. Asking in a non-partisan way may be a means of projecting a Prime Ministerial persona."

Murphy transcribed videos of six sessions; Hansard (Parliament's official record) he says, is likely to miss, or 'clean up' key phrases and cannot record the way a phrase is uttered, for instance, whether it uses an aggressive or condescending tone of voice.

There are objective, routine ways of expressing politeness, he adds, many of which appear in questions asked at PMQs, including:

  • An element of praise for a policy precedes (or follows) criticism of it.
  • Government failures are described as being unintentional or the fault of others.
  • The criticism is minimized or muted
  • Criticism of the PM is deflected by attacking a third party.
  • The questioner comments on a positive personality trait of the PM.

Government MPs:

  • 80 % asked questions politely
  • 5 % asked questions impolitely
  • 15 % were neither polite nor impolite

Opposition MPs:

  • 68 % asked questions impolitely
  • 16 % asked questions politely
  • 16 % were neither polite nor impolite

The Leader of the Opposition:

  • 84 % impolitely
  • 6 % politely ('Serious' topics such as war and floods.)
  • 10 % neither polite nor impolite

The full paper, '(Im)politeness during 's Questions in the UK Parliament' is available. It is to be published in the journal Pragmatics and Society.

Explore further: UK phone-hacking 'targeted ex-premier Brown'

Related Stories

UK phone-hacking 'targeted ex-premier Brown'

January 23, 2011

Britain's opposition Labour party called Sunday for a fresh police probe into phone-hacking by journalists, amid reports that former prime minister Gordon Brown was among the high-profile figures targeted.

What does your MP really believe?

August 28, 2008

( -- MPs tend to 'toe the party line' on parliamentary votes, but when it comes to expressing their private opinions, Dan Bailey and Guy Nason, statisticians from the University of Bristol, have looked at just ...

The perils of polite misunderstandings

October 11, 2011

Your friend debuts a questionable haircut and asks what you think of it. Brutal honesty would definitely hurt his feelings, so what do you say? Most people in this situation would probably opt for a vague or evasive response, ...

Australian parliament passes divisive carbon tax

October 12, 2011

Australia's lower house on Wednesday passed a contentious new tax on carbon pollution to combat climate change which has angered many voters and threatens Prime Minister Julia Gillard's hold on power.

British PM faces backlash over 'snooping' plans

April 2, 2012

British Prime Minister David Cameron is facing a growing backlash from within his own party over plans to extend the government's powers to monitor people's email exchanges and website visits.

UK deputy leader: Surveillance bill won't happen

April 25, 2013

A mass Internet monitoring program touted by Britain's government as a terror-fighting tool is unworkable, the country's deputy leader said Thursday, vowing that it would not become law.

Recommended for you

The oldest plesiosaur was a strong swimmer

December 14, 2017

Plesiosaurs were especially effective swimmers. These long extinct "paddle saurians" propelled themselves through the oceans by employing "underwater flight"—similar to sea turtles and penguins. Paleontologist from the ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.