UN court to hear Australia bid to halt Japan whaling

Fishermen slaughter a 10m-long bottlenose whale at the Wada port, Chiba prefecture, Japan in June 2008
Fishermen slaughter a 10m-long bottlenose whale at the Wada port, Chiba prefecture, Japan in June 2008. Australia is to fire the opening salvoes in a legal battle before the United Nations' highest court in June aimed at stopping Japan's whaling research programme in Antarctica.

Australia will fire the opening salvoes in a legal battle before the United Nations' highest court in June to try to stop Japan's whale hunt in Antarctica.

"The International of Justice... will hold public hearings in the case concerning whaling in the Antarctic, Australia versus Japan, from Wednesday 26 June," the Hague-based ICJ said in a statement Thursday.

Canberra took Tokyo to court on May 31, 2010, alleging "Japan's continued pursuit" of a large-scale whaling hunt, which Japan calls scientific research, put the nation in breach of international conventions and its obligation to preserve marine mammals and their environment.

Unlike Norway and Iceland, which openly flout the 1986 on commercial whaling agreed through the International Whaling Commission (IWC), Japan hunts exploit a that allows lethal scientific research.

Japan's annual whale hunt has long drawn worldwide criticism but Tokyo defends the practice, saying eating whale is a culinary tradition.

In Sydney on Friday, Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus, who will appear before the court, said in a statement: "Australia wants this slaughter to end.

"We will now have our day in court to establish, once and for all, that Japan's whaling hunt is not for scientific purposes and is against international law."

His statement went on: "The fixing of the date sets up the final stage in this case brought by the Australian Government. The oral hearings are the last phase of before the Court makes its decision.

Graphic on Japan's annual whale catch
Graphic on Japan's annual whale catch, at a record low of 103 this year, according to data released by the government.

"We hope the court will deliver its decision on the legality of Japan's whaling before the start of the next whaling season."

Both parties have already made written submissions.

Environment Minister Tony Burke said: "Australia's views on whaling are well known—we condemn all commercial whaling, including Japan's so-called 'scientific' whaling.

"The 's decision to bring this legal action demonstrates our determination to end ."

But Tokyo vowed to fight its corner.

"Japan will defend its as it is within the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling rules, which is the founding document of the IWC," a Japanese fisheries agency official told AFP.

A Japanese foreign ministry official in charge of the case added: "We will argue that our whaling activity is being done legally."

Dreyfus and Solicitor-General Justin Gleeson will front the court from the opening day, followed a week later by Japan's representatives on July 2.

A ruling may not be handed down for several months.

Japan last week announced its whaling haul from the Southern Ocean was a "record low" this year, blaming "unforgivable sabotage" by activists.

The hunt netted 103 Antarctic minke , the lowest since "research whaling" began in 1987, blamed on the actions of the Sea Shepherd conservation group.

Canberra and New Zealand—which will also make a submission at the ICJ hearings—have been outraged by the hunt, with Burke saying last week Japan's latest whale tally "is 103 whales too many".

Established in 1945, the ICJ is the UN's highest judicial body and settles disputes between states.


Explore further

N. Zealand joins Australia bid to halt Japan whaling

(c) 2013 AFP

Citation: UN court to hear Australia bid to halt Japan whaling (2013, April 12) retrieved 20 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2013-04-court-australia-halt-japan-whaling.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Apr 12, 2013
Japan should retaliate by making an issue of Australia's refusal to clean up the Great Barrier Reef as they have committed to doing, because as a governor of Queensland said they are in the coal business (meaning producing coal takes precedence over a healthy barrier reef).

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more