US seeks to prevent spill from grounded oil rig

January 2, 2013
This image provided by the US Coast Guard, shows the conical mobile drilling unit Kulluk owned by Royal Dutch Shell aground on the southeast side of Sitkalidak Island, Alaska, January 1, 2013. US Coast Guard vowed Wednesday to prevent fuel from leaking from a Shell oil rig that grounded in Alaska after breaking free from tugboats towing it in heavy seas.

US Coast Guard vowed Wednesday to prevent fuel from leaking from a Shell oil rig that grounded in Alaska after breaking free from tugboats towing it in heavy seas.

The Kalluk mobile drilling unit was being towed to Seattle when it broke free on New Year's Eve and washed ashore near Kodiak Island, some 300 miles (480 km) southwest of Anchorage.

The rig has some 150,000 gallons of ultra-low sulphur diesel and roughly 12,000 gallons of oil and hydraulic fluid, according to the far northwestern US state's KTUU television station.

There is no sign of leaks, but further checks were being made as authorities considered how to salvage the structure, the Coast Guard said after US senator Lisa Murkowski visited a Command Center set up for the incident Tuesday.

"Senator Murkowski shares the Coast Guard's desire to protect the pristine Alaska environment and response personnel," said Rear Admiral Thomas Ostebo in an update posted online Wednesday.

"Everyone involved in the response effort has the same objective: to safely recover the Kulluk without injuries or impact to the environment. So far, response personnel have demonstrated great resourcefulness and adaptability to the weather and other challenges in a very difficult operation."

Eighteen crew members had already been evacuated from the rig before it broke free late Monday, New Year's Eve, KTUU reported. By Tuesday it was described as "upright and rocking with a slow, but stable motion."

Oil company Royal Dutch Shell said three people suffered minor injuries during the response to the Kulluk's grounding, according to the television station.

"The and high seas continue to be a challenge, said Shell incident commander Susan Childs. "Our priority right now is maintaining the safety of our response personnel and evaluating next steps."

Kodiak Island is a few hundred miles from Prince William Sound, where the "Exxon Valdez" oil tanker spilled around 11 million gallons (40 million litres) in March 1989, in one of the world's worst ever ecological disasters.

Explore further: Fuel spill at same Alaska reef as Exxon Valdez

Related Stories

Fuel spill at same Alaska reef as Exxon Valdez

December 25, 2009

A tugboat struck the same reef as the Exxon Valdez tanker 20 years ago, spilling diesel into Alaska's Prince William Sound and creating a three-mile-long slick, the US Coast Guard said on Friday.

'Major oil spill' as rig sinks off US coast

April 23, 2010

A blazing oil rig has sunk into the Gulf of Mexico, sparking fears of an environmental disaster two days after a massive blast that left 11 workers missing.

US Coast Guard slams Transocean

April 23, 2011

The US Coast Guard slammed drilling rig operator Transocean's "poor safety culture" in a report Friday on the massive explosion and fire that unleashed the biggest maritime oil spill in history.

Exxon Valdez oil spill tanker banned from India

May 9, 2012

The Exxon Valdez tanker that was involved in a huge oil spill off Alaska in 1989 has been banned from entering India where it was due to be dismantled, state officials said Wednesday.

Recommended for you

Gauging the effects of water scarcity on an irrigated planet

April 20, 2018

Growing global food demand, climate change, and climate policies favoring bioenergy production are expected to increase pressures on water resources around the world. Many analysts predict that water shortages will constrain ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3.7 / 5 (3) Jan 02, 2013
Hey --where's that contingency emergency response plan that RDS had in place to deal with the vanishingly small, astronomically remote possibility of just this sort of thing happening in the case of attempted petro drilling/exploration in the predictably unpredictable and wild Arctic weather --especially during the approach to Winter at these latitudes?

The same place as all such emergency plans are: on paper, only --as a mere formality necessary to the permitting process, made up of whole cloth-- with no basis in actual, physical reality.

These fucks already dodged a bullet earlier in the Autumn, and then further pushed their luck, asking for an extension of their drilling window(due unnaturally, unseasonably mild weather late into the Autumn-- how about that!!!) and are now faced with the consequences of their wholly greed-based, profit driven decision to ignore the most basic caution in the face of the likely(ie, virtually certain) consequences.

Now enter the apologists.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.