Data on financial crime is not credible

The Government and police efforts to tackle financial crime – from business fraud to tax evasion – are hampered by a lack of accurate data about the nature and extent of offending, according to new research.

Most of the data available on financial crime is produced without a credible methodology, says Michael Levi, Professor of at Cardiff University, whose research was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).

"Typically, the information available on offending or threat is just a marketing hype," says Professor Levi. "It comes from business consultants who want to scare companies and government into buying services aimed at dealing with problems that may be a lot smaller than claimed."

"Even when public agencies do make a serious effort to produce data that they believe is carefully researched, it often lacks professional or public credibility," says Professor Levi. "In an age of cynicism, their efforts can be interpreted as an attempt to increase their budgets and powers. This is a crisis of authority and ."

Professor Levi has spent years researching the organisation and extent of financial crime and the ways in which police, regulators and understand and respond to the various forms of threat.

A lack of clear thinking about how offenders and victims can and should be dealt with also makes it more difficult to tackle financial crimes in a coherent way, he believes. "We need a better informed, evidence-based debate about what kind of policing we want and should expect for ," he says.

"For example, large tax frauds are nearly always dealt with via a settlement payment. Yet social security fraudsters get a for crimes involving much smaller amounts of money. How do we justify treating offenders so differently?"

The research into tax fraud suggests there is a set of persistent offenders who are unlikely to be discouraged if their only punishment when caught is to pay a financial settlement anonymously. "They need to be prosecuted so they are taken out of circulation and to show others that this kind of behaviour will be dealt with seriously," he says.

Professor Levi has been sharing his research findings with UK and global organisations with a crime-fighting remit. They include the Financial Services Authority, the National Fraud Authority, the Association of Chief Police Officers and the European Commission.

"It is impossible to quantify the problem precisely, but the damage done by financial crime is real and the public are rightly worried about the risk of falling victim." he says. "Financial crime is one of the biggest business and social issues of our time. If we are to make a better job of dealing with the problem we need to move beyond oversimplified forms like 'organised crime' to work out how online and offline fraud and laundering are enabled and what it takes to change these opportunities and motivations."

Explore further

Corrupt UK?

Citation: Data on financial crime is not credible (2012, December 13) retrieved 20 October 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Dec 14, 2012
Creative accounting methods have always kept 'outsiders' in the dark when trying to track ill-gotten or laundered money. I've seen accounting methods so complex, even seasoned CPA's couldn't track it with any certainty. And it becomes even more insidious when a company keeps two sets of books: one for the auditors, and one for those who keep track of what's really happening.

Dec 15, 2012
From Rolling Stone:
They're now saying that if you're not an important cog in the global financial system, you can't get away with anything, not even simple possession. You will be jailed and whatever cash they find on you they'll seize on the spot, and convert into new cruisers or toys for your local SWAT team, which will be deployed to kick in the doors of houses where more such inessential economic cogs as you live. If you don't have a systemically important job, in other words, the government's position is that your assets may be used to finance your own political disenfranchisement.

On the other hand...even if you actively collude with the people at the very top of the international narcotics trade, your punishment will be far smaller than that of the person at the very bottom of the world drug pyramid...we're now in the business, officially, of jailing the victims and enabling the criminals.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more