E-waste recycling—at whose expense?

E-waste recycling--at whose expense?
Globally, electronic waste is the fastest growing waste stream. 20-50 million computers become waste each year. According to recent estimations only 20 % of all e-waste is formally recycled. 80 % is shipped to developing countries where informal recycling processes are common.

Computers, tablets and mobile phones are all popular consumer products. The lifespan of these devices is usually short, between two to four years. Shakila Umair, researcher at KTH, travelled to Pakistan to see how these common electronic devices are dismantled and recycled. She investigated the harsh living conditions of people working with e-waste.

Shakila Umair, researcher at KTH Centre for Sustainable Communications, made two field trips to Pakistan to study how e-waste is actually taken care of. She conducted a "social " (s-LCA) on the social impacts of informal e-waste recycling in Pakistan.

"There are massive health and social problems connected to e- in Pakistan. At the same time it is the only source of livelihood for thousands of people", says Shakila Umair.

The assessment showed that the informal processes have a number of negative social and environmental impacts. Workers manually dismantle old equipment, burn wires to get copper and dip old circuit boards in acid to extract such as gold and silver. They inhale every day and lack awareness of the health risks.

E-waste recycling--at whose expense?
A man manually dismantling printers after which carcinogenic printer ink is left on the ground.

"Relatively small protective measures such as gloves and masks would easily make a big difference on the workers' health. But they cannot afford it themselves", says Shakila Umair.

Men, women and even children are working with e-waste up to twelve hours per day, six days a week, without social security or benefits. Their income is low, approximately 2.7 dollars per day (or less than 1.4 SEK per hour).

E-waste recycling--at whose expense?
Even children are working with e-waste recycling. Here a boy is shovelling capacitors removed from motherboards. The capacitors are processed for gold.

There are international regulations preventing the transfer of hazardous waste, such as e-waste from developed to less developed countries. But there are which result in a growing in e-waste. About 80% of all e-waste is shipped to developing countries where poor people recycle it manually at much lower cost than if it were recycled in more developed countries.

Recently, the regulations around e-waste have become stricter in both India and China. This means that more e-waste will end up in countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh with weaker legislation and authority control.

E-waste recycling--at whose expense?
A boy burning wires for copper extraction.

Shakila Umair does not want to see a stop of e-waste treatment in Pakistan, since it is the livelihood for thousands of poor people. But e-waste treatment needs to be formalised, at least partially. What she asks for is that both local authorities and global ICT manufacturers take responsibility for the health and social situation of the workers in the informal e-waste economy.

"Why not include the conditions of these 'distant workers' in the Corporate Social Responsibility policies of global ICT suppliers?" concludes Shakila Umair.

Explore further

Elevated concentrations of metals in China’s e-waste recycling workshops

More information: Umair, S., Björklund, A., Ekener Petersen, E. (2013) Social Life Cycle Inventory and Impact Assessment of Informal recycling of Electronic ICT Waste in Pakistan. Conference paper to be presented at the First International ICT for Sustainability Conference (ICT4S), Zurich, 14-16 February 2013.
cesc.kth.se/wp-content/uploads … ial-LCA-Pakistan.pdf
Provided by KTH Centre of Excellence for Sustainable Communications
Citation: E-waste recycling—at whose expense? (2012, December 20) retrieved 24 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2012-12-e-waste-recyclingat-expense.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Dec 28, 2012
There is a significant factual error in the article. "About 80% of all e-waste is shipped to developing countries where poor people recycle it manually at much lower cost than if it were recycled in more developed countries." There is no source given, the organization which has distributed it in the past has disowned it. Three peer reviewed studies found 85%, 87%, and 90% of imports were working or repairable (especially display devices, which do not follow Moore's law but are "upgraded" in wealthy nations). The article is strongest when it advocates for better workplace safety standards (already a known issue in textile manufacturing, etc. and certainly a concern in "e-waste"). But the UNEP and others have clearly shown that most of the obsolete equipment in emerging markets is generated by their own consumers, and the 80% junk exports is a myth. A scientific journal like this should elevate the discussion. visit the Fair Trade Recycling group on Facebook for other ideas.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more