Congress works better than many think, new research shows

December 14, 2012

(—The perception of Congress as a gridlocked institution where little happens is overblown, according to new research by scholars at the University of Colorado Boulder and the University of Washington.

And the way much of Congress' work gets done is through self-manufactured crises like the "fiscal cliff," say political science professors Scott Adler of CU-Boulder and John Wilkerson of UW.

"Yes, Congress has taken on a more partisan tone in recent decades," Adler said. "We do hear a lot about the conflicts between on key pieces of legislation. But we're also seeing Congress exceeding public expectations. Congress does govern."

Adler and Wilkerson studied several decades of lawmaking to better understand how issues end up on the legislative agenda and the factors that lead to policy change. In a new book, "Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving" from Cambridge University Press, they reveal that they were surprised to find political friction had a limited influence on congressional productivity. 

"Understandably, the media, scholars and the public tend to be more attentive to , especially partisan conflict, than to political cooperation," Wilkerson said. "Yet on most issues, including the most important issues, consensus and cooperation are the norm within Congress."

It is a common congressional practice to pass short-term legislation that forces lawmakers to revisit important issues on a regular basis, the authors said. The "fiscal cliff" has helped to draw attention to the use of manufactured crises "to induce bargaining between Democrats and Republicans, between the president and Congress and between the House and Senate," Adler said. 

This is not a new development. In fact, the first substantive law passed by the very first Congress in 1789 was set up to expire six years later. Short-term laws have been passed with greater frequency since the 1960s as the congressional agenda has become increasingly crowded. Today Congress simply has too much to deal with to operate in any other way, they said. 

Most major programs are on schedules that have them expiring every four, five or six years. And because the reauthorization calendar is known years in advance, everyone, including lobbyists and other stakeholders, knows when it is and is not time to press for policy changes. Wilkerson and Adler found that program expirations are the best predictors of when big policy changes will occur. 

"An expiring law does not necessarily lead to significant reform," Wilkerson said. "Sometimes Congress just renews it because there is little need for reform. At other times, Congress extends because partisan differences inhibit substantive progress. But often these manufactured crises do serve as the catalysts for significant policy change.

"The Elementary and Secondary Act of 1965 comes up for reauthorization every six years, and has been the catalyst for major education reforms," Wilkerson said. "The Civil Rights Act similarly comes up for reauthorization on a regular basis, and these reauthorizations have served as catalysts for important expansions of civil rights protections. The same can be said for transportation, intelligence and many other policy areas."

Congress has had less success reforming issues that are not on recurring schedules, such as immigration and energy, the professors said. Passing smaller programs on a short-term basis in these areas might be one approach to encouraging more action. These renewals might then provide the catalysts for broader policy changes, as has been the case with the Higher Education Act. 

"By reading our book, we hope that observers of Congress will better appreciate what does and how it does it," Wilkerson said.

Explore further: Health care reform 'important' even to those who want new law repealed

Related Stories

Web site tracks congressional, presidential priorities

November 25, 2010

( -- As a new Congress prepares to take office, a powerful online tool from University of Texas at Austin political scientists can help answer questions about lawmakers' shifting focus over time, differences between ...

Lawmakers try to lift wolf protection despite deal

April 1, 2011

(AP) -- Key lawmakers in the political skirmish over gray wolves in the West say they will continue their efforts to lift federal protections for the predators, despite a proposed settlement between environmentalists and ...

Recommended for you

Metacognition training boosts gen chem exam scores

October 20, 2017

It's a lesson in scholastic humility: You waltz into an exam, confident that you've got a good enough grip on the class material to swing an 80 percent or so, maybe a 90 if some of the questions go your way.

Scientists see order in complex patterns of river deltas

October 19, 2017

River deltas, with their intricate networks of waterways, coastal barrier islands, wetlands and estuaries, often appear to have been formed by random processes, but scientists at the University of California, Irvine and other ...

Six degrees of separation: Why it is a small world after all

October 19, 2017

It's a small world after all - and now science has explained why. A study conducted by the University of Leicester and KU Leuven, Belgium, examined how small worlds emerge spontaneously in all kinds of networks, including ...

Ancient DNA offers new view on saber-toothed cats' past

October 19, 2017

Researchers who've analyzed the complete mitochondrial genomes from ancient samples representing two species of saber-toothed cats have a new take on the animals' history over the last 50,000 years. The data suggest that ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Dec 14, 2012
bullshit. this congress is doing well? really? get real. which reality do these people live in?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.