Claim of supersolid helium disproved by original researcher

October 15, 2012 by Bob Yirka, report

The original torsional oscillator used by Kim and Chan in 2004. Credit: M. Chan/Penn State
(—Moses Chan, co-author of a paper published in 2004 describing work that resulted in claims of the discovery of supersolid helium, has now co-authored another paper, published in Physical Review Letters, describing flaws in his original research. He and new colleague Duk Kim redesigned the original experiment: this time, they found no evidence of a supersolid.

Solid objects hold their shape due to a made of atoms. suggests that under very cold conditions, can cause some of the atoms in a structure to begin to move freely, thereby acting as a frictionless liquid, resulting in a supersolid.

Chan and his earlier partner Eunseong Kim believed they had proven the existence of supersolid helium after conducting an experiment that involved cooling helium that had been collected inside of a type of glass known as Vycor. The helium-glass mixture was hung from a chamber that was spun in first one direction, then the other, oscillating back and forth. As the temperature was brought down, the researchers noted that the rate increased. This, they claimed, was the result of some of the helium atoms inside slipping between the others in the lattice—a clear sign of a supersolid.

Three years later, a team led by John Beamish suggested that bulk helium, rather than becoming a supersolid as it was cooled, instead became stiffer, accounting for the increased oscillation rate found by Chan and Kim. Subsequent experiments by other researchers have found actual examples of this phenomenon and have since named it quantum plasticity.

Seeking to settle the matter once and for all, Chan and new partner Duk Kim redesigned the original experiment in a way that eliminated the possibility of bulk helium forming in a gap between the chamber and the helium-glass mixture. Doing so resulted in no increase in the rate of oscillation as the chamber was cooled. This result suggests that the increased oscillation rate of the earlier experiment was due to quantum plasticity, not the development of a helium supersolid.

This new research doesn't disprove theories regarding supersolids of course. Rather, it demonstrates that faulty research can sometimes lead to new discoveries such as, in this case, quantum plasticity.

Explore further: Probable observation of a supersolid helium phase

More information: Absence of Supersolidity in Solid Helium in Porous Vycor Glass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 155301 (2012) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.155301

In 2004, Kim and Chan carried out torsional oscillator measurements of solid helium confined in porous Vycor glass and found an abrupt drop in the resonant period below 200 mK. The period drop was interpreted as probable experimental evidence of nonclassical rotational inertia. This experiment sparked considerable activities in the studies of superfluidity in solid helium. More recent ultrasound and torsional oscillator studies, however, found evidence that shear modulus stiffening is responsible for at least a fraction of the period drop found in bulk solid helium samples. The experimental configuration of Kim and Chan makes it unavoidable to have a small amount of bulk solid inside the torsion cell containing the Vycor disk. We report here the results of a new helium in Vycor experiment with a design that is completely free from any bulk solid shear modulus stiffening effect. We found no measurable period drop that can be attributed to nonclassical rotational inertia.

via Physics Focus

Related Stories

Probable observation of a supersolid helium phase

April 21, 2004

Just last year we have seen a Nobel Prize in physics awarded to Abrikosov, Ginzburg and Leggett for "pioneering contributions to the theory of superconductors and superfluids" And now Nature publishes an article by E. Kim ...

A crack in the case for supersolids

June 21, 2010

New experiments are casting doubt on previously reported observations of supersolid helium. In a paper appearing in the current issue of Physical Review Letters, John Reppy (Cornell University) presents research suggesting ...

Supersolid helium unlikely

May 17, 2011

( -- Does helium-4 become a "supersolid" near absolute zero? What previous researchers thought might be a supersolid transition is better explained by changes in the solid's resistance to shearing, according to ...

Searching for a solid that flows like a liquid

February 3, 2012

( -- A series of neutron scattering experiments at Oak Ridge National Laboratory and other research centers is exploring the key question about a long-sought quantum state of matter called supersolidity: Does ...

Recommended for you

CMS gets first result using largest-ever LHC data sample

February 15, 2019

Just under three months after the final proton–proton collisions from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)'s second run (Run 2), the CMS collaboration has submitted its first paper based on the full LHC dataset collected in ...

Gravitational waves will settle cosmic conundrum

February 14, 2019

Measurements of gravitational waves from approximately 50 binary neutron stars over the next decade will definitively resolve an intense debate about how quickly our universe is expanding, according to findings from an international ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (5) Oct 15, 2012
Honesty is always the best policy.
5 / 5 (7) Oct 15, 2012
This is how science is supposed to work.
3 / 5 (2) Oct 15, 2012
t demonstrates that faulty research can sometimes lead to new discoveries such as, in this case, quantum plasticity
How the quantum plasticity differs from supersolidity?
2.3 / 5 (3) Oct 18, 2012
I see, nobody here actually understands this subject...;-) Honesty is always the best policy.
3.8 / 5 (17) Oct 18, 2012
I see, nobody here actually understands this subject...;-) Honesty is always the best policy.
So, I understand that helium is a specific sort of vibration in an infinitely dense 'aether' kind of stuff, but occurring on the surface as a higher-dimensional sort of apparition, sort of. Like waves in a big gooey pond. Right?

Sorry, I cant say it with your accent.
How the quantum plasticity differs from supersolidity?
Arent you supposed to be answering these sorts of questions instead of asking them?
1 / 5 (2) Oct 19, 2012
Aren't you supposed to be answering these sorts of questions instead of asking them?
Mainstream physics suffers with overemployment and it often calls the same phenomena and theories with different names. My opinion is, these two concepts don't differ conceptually each other, but I cannot be an expert in everything.
1 / 5 (1) Oct 19, 2012
IMO the supersolidity effect is real and it manifest itself even under high temperatures as a well known crunching of snow. It's not effect of bulk material, but the surfaces of its crystal grains and dislocations, which makes its detection a bit elusive (when the material recrystallizes under prolonged standing like the ice cream, the effect disappears). In addition, it's inhibited with minute amount of impurities (He 4), which do adsorb to the surface of crystals and terminate the dislocation movement - it makes the effect even more difficult to measure reliably.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.