Researchers make progress in understanding, predicting solder joint failures

How Lead-Free Solder (Mis)Behaves under Stress
Lead-free SAC305 solder joints are often a single crystal upon solidification. Thermal strain in the corner joint of a WLCSP package was measured in situ by the peak shift in a diffraction pattern during a thermal cycle: Unstrained (420) plane spacing in the unit cell (black) varies with temperature. Strain ~⊥ to joint on (420) plane varies with temperature (blue). Elastic strain is much more negative after 220 thermal cycles, and the diffraction pattern (bottom) develops streaks, indicating increased dislocation density and subgrain development. This shows how the microstructural evolution mechanism begins. Credit: T.R. Bieler, F. Pourboghrat, and T.-K. Lee.

(—The reliability and longevity of electronics are critical to our interconnected world that is so dependent upon Internet and telecommunications technology. The computers, routers and switches, phones, and all the devices that link us together must be dependable down to the solder joints that connect integrated circuits to circuit boards, which can be an Achilles heel in an otherwise failure-free device.

Utilizing new synchrotron x-ray techniques and two synchrotron x-ray beamlines at the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science's Advanced Photon Source (APS), researchers studied the beginnings of the thermal fatigue process in environmentally friendly, lead-free solder joints, as well as what happens toward the end of that process. These insights bring scientists a step closer to developing useful models for making reliability predictions about solder-joint failure in this new material.

"In electronic system failures, more than half are solder joint failures," said Thomas Bieler of Michigan State University, a coauthor of the two Journal of articles based on these studies. "There are a lot of these connections, and a failure in any one of them could potentially kill the functionality of the entire system."

The first century of electronics used lead-based solder because it was cheap and easy to work with. Engineers thoroughly understood the electrical, thermal, and structural behavior of these solders and were able to accurately predict reliability. As the environmental dangers of lead became apparent, manufacturers looked for alternatives. In 2006, the European Union Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive came into effect, banning lead-containing solders from all . But while protecting people and the environment, the ban created a new problem: How reliable were lead-free solders?

"Especially in the , the expected lifetime of many products is long, and also a very low failure rate is needed," said coauthor Tae-Kyu Lee of the Component Quality and Technology Group at Cisco Systems. "Before 2006, the industry had a very large library of reliability data based on lead-containing material, so even if they didn't know the exact failure mechanism, they could still assess the lifetime of the product. But since we're now using a new material, we need to know more about how the material's performance evolves."

The researchers in this study developed new techniques and employed them at the APS to track the development of the failure mechanism of lead-free solder joints in situ for the first time. Working at the X-ray Science Division 6-ID-D and 34-ID-E beamlines at the Argonne National Laboratory APS, they conducted experiments to demonstrate how synchrotron x-ray diffraction could reveal the evolution of crystal orientation and strain patterns during thermal cycling in tin-containing, lead-free solder joints, specifically in the commonly used tin-silver-copper alloy SAC 305 (Sn-3%Ag-0.5% Cu).

Older lead-tin solders tend to solidify as a polycrystal, delivering a solder joint that has a uniform microstructure, with reproducible properties. But lead-free solders usually solidify either as a randomly oriented single crystal or a tricrystal. "With the lead-free solders, the properties of solder joints are all over the map," Bieler said. "Some joints have hard orientations, others soft, some last forever, some fail at a very early time. That makes life difficult for electronics manufacturers when they have to think about warranty costs and when the first failure is going to happen."

Failures in lead-free solders don't always occur in areas where shear strains from thermal expansion mismatches are highest. This is a consequence of the non-cubic structure of tin and its highly anisotropic thermal expansion and stiffness. It is difficult to predict the strains that develop in an individual joint, given the random crystal orientation, so the prediction of damage is even more challenging. Furthermore, the crystal orientations evolve with thermal cycling. The experimenters examined SAC 305 joints both in a plastic ball grid array (PBGA) package sample and a wafer-level chip-scale package (WLCSP). Both types have been examined under thermal cycling, and the latter was studied in situ during melting, resolidification, and thermal cycling.

The advantages of the x-ray approach over the cross-sectional electron microscopy generally used to study solder joints were immediately apparent. "In a two-dimensional cross section, one does not necessarily know what has been removed or what is underneath the surface. With three-dimensional full illumination of the joint, we were able to prove that we did indeed primarily have single crystals in some joints and tricrystals in others," said Bieler.

"To clearly predict the lifetime of a certain joint," said Lee, "we need to understand the failure mechanism. This study allowed us to see inside the joint while imposing thermal cycles in situ. Most of the earlier studies use destructive analysis to see the microstructure development after things happened. But the APS synchrotron lets us see the microstructure evolution during the event."

The x-ray diffraction measurements also provide a more dynamic picture of what happens inside the solder joint as it passes through different phases over time. For example, although there are only a few different tin crystal orientations in a given SAC lead-free solder joint, different orientations are always observed after melting and resolidification. Recrystallization behavior under thermal cycling also results in evolution of the tin crystal orientation.

Lee was surprised by "the overall tin material response to the external factors. I considered tin as a 'dead' material with a certain crystal structure, but the more you look into this material, it seems to react like a living thing."

"What the APS data has especially enabled us to do is get a comprehensive picture of the very beginning of the thermal fatigue process [on beamline 6-ID-D] and connect it with what happens toward the end [on beamline 34-ID-E]," Bieler said.

Observing how the x-ray diffraction peaks changed from initial solidification and proceeded to spread out over repeated thermal cycles, Bieler said, "really helped us get to the point where we could describe the sequential mechanism from the moment of solidification up to the first crack that forms. We are able to explain everything that happened and why it happened in these solder joints as a result of what we've been able to do at the APS. The APS has been very helpful for understanding the early stage as well as the stage just before cracks form."

These fresh insights into the failure mechanism of lead-free solder joints guide scientists in their development of models for making reliability predictions. Although it is too early to proclaim any definite remedy for improving reliability in lead-free solder joints, the work provides some important clues.

"To find the right mitigation, you need to find the right failure mechanism," Lee said. "Based on the study so far, we identified that the grain refinement in tin interconnects is bad for thermal cycling performance. But at the same time it is beneficial for resistance to mechanical shock. So there are no golden rules, but at least we are beginning to understand why."

As for next steps, Bieler said that "finding a reliable, automated way to index diffraction patterns from multi-crystal joints would greatly speed up our ability to mine the data we have more effectively. Analysis strategies to obtain stress and strain would naturally follow using established methods. Continuing in situ measurements in thermomechanical cycling specimens, and looking toward comparing the microstructure before and after shock conditions (or possibly in situ), could also be effective. Microbeam diffraction in solder bumps is also a desirable thing to do, as the volumes are small, and this method is well suited for exploring tiny places."

Explore further

IMEC shows progress in lead-free materials at IMAPS EMPC 2005

More information: Bite Zhou, Thomas R. Bieler, Guilin Wu, Stefan Zaefferer, Tae-Kyu Lee, and Kuo-Chuan Liu, "In Situ Synchrotron Characterization of Melting, Dissolution, and Resolidification in Lead-Free Solders," J. Electron. Mater. 41(2), 262 (2012). DOI: 10.1007/s11664-011-1785-8
Citation: Researchers make progress in understanding, predicting solder joint failures (2012, October 9) retrieved 13 October 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Oct 09, 2012
I've alway thought it was strange the way the EU banned leaded solder from electronics, supposedly to remove it from the environment, then a short time later mandated that all electronics had to be recycled.
Once they mandated that all electronics be recycled, they should have removed the ban on leaded solder.
Unleaded solder joints are much less reliable than leaded solder joints.
Not just because of mechanical failures, but because the tin grows whiskers that produce circuit shorts. The lead in leaded solder stopped the whisker growth.

Oct 09, 2012
I've alway thought it was strange the way the EU banned leaded solder from electronics,

What's so strange about it? At the time there were a lot of jobs where peple would hand soldier stuff (and to this day there are repair groups in many small to medium electronics firms where people repair electronics sent in rather than throw them out and hand back new ones. Especially for low volume/custom products. )

I did have such a job while I did a mandatory practical semseter - and believe you me: I was very glad that I didn't have to sit bent over a sodiering iron with leaded fumes going into my face (the fumes were still noxious enough as they were - and no matter how you set up your fans there was no getting away from it all)

Oct 09, 2012
@tpb, You would be amazed to know how much electronics, energy lamps and other stuff end up in open waste dumps, with household left-overs and detergent bottles. Add some rain water, and you can only imagine the result.

Even landfills are better, because they usually are well drained and covered with clay or other waterproof material.

Yes, recycling is up. But unfortunately, we all have to live restricted lives (here, too) just because of some moronic and indifferent individuals.

Oct 10, 2012
Can't help thinking the EU should've allowed time for lead-free solders to develop similar reliability as their leaded counterparts before issuing the 2006 ban. As one of thousands who wasted £500+ on Nvidia's next-generation 8800GTX graphics card back in 2007, only for it to fail within 6 months, at least i now know who to blame (Brussels).

Following advice threads on forums i reflowed the board in an electric oven, but this fix would only last weeks or months before further failures, depending on the ambient temperature and thus thermal cycling magnitudes... and this research seems to offer the explanation why. Presumably a permanent fix is impossible.. Thanks Brussels!

Oct 10, 2012
As a side effect, now all electronics is guaranteed to eventually fail because of whiskers. And people will thus end up discarding more electronic equipment (which still contain other toxic pollutants). Manufacturers will subsequently have to produce more electronics (perhaps to their delight), placing additional strain on the environment, as well as consuming more limited resources (rare earths, etc).

Even those of us who don't (yet) live under RoHS mandates still have to suffer the consequences, as electronics manufacturers distribute the same products world-wide.

My impression is RoHS was the result of group (of bureaucrats?) bereft of technical knowledge. Not like they shouldn't have known it would happen. Industry has been aware of the problem since the 1940s.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more