Researchers explore Li-air battery reversibility on the nanoscale

( -- As their name suggests, Li-air batteries use air to operate, pulling out oxygen molecules to use in a porous, carbon-based cathode, while using lithium in the anode. Because using air means the battery doesn’t have to store a heavy charge source at the cathode, the batteries can provide an extremely high energy density, holding nearly as much energy in a given volume as gasoline, and 5-10 times more than Li-ion batteries. Despite this major appeal, Li-air batteries still face many limitations that hold them back from commercialization. In a new study, a team of researchers has tackled one of these challenges: reversibility, which is necessary for being able to recharge the battery multiple times.

The researchers, Thomas Arruda, Amit Kumar, Sergei Kalinin, and Stephen Jesse at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee, have published a paper in a recent issue of Nanotechnology in which they explore factors controlling the reversibility of the particle growth on an electrolyte underlying Li-air batteries and nanobatteries.

“We believe this work paves the way for studying irreversible or quasi-reversible electrochemistry – in materials systems ranging from Li-air batteries to more established fields such as corrosion, electroplating, and many others,” Kalinin told

“Primary Li batteries, which are non-rechargeable and disposable, have high energy densities and have been commercially available since the 1960s; however, they can only be used once,” said Arruda. “In order for these cells to be competitive, for example, with fossil fuels (i.e., automotive applications), they need to be recharged hundreds, if not thousands, of times. Consider the average commuter refueling once per week. This equates to more than 500 fills over the course of a decade. An automotive Li-air battery would need to match this criterion, even without considering cost or other important metrics. In fact, reversibility remains the single most important and difficult task to achieve for Li-air batteries, as evidenced by the intense scrutiny of the leading battery experts.”

When a charged Li-air battery is in use, the Li ions in the anode travel to the , where they react with oxygen via an oxygen reduction reaction. The electrons resulting from this reaction are then harvested and used to provide electricity for electronic devices. To recharge the battery, the Li ions must travel from the cathode back to the anode. As the researchers explain, the reason it is so difficult to make Li-air batteries rechargeable is because the batteries combine the most difficult processes used in both batteries and fuel cells.

“Underpinning these processes is an abundance of unfavorable chemistries such as the poor solubility of reaction products (LiOx species), slow reaction kinetics, and the propensity of Li metal to react unfavorably with nearly everything,” Jesse said. “For the case of the anode, the electrodeposition of Li ions to metallic Li often proceeds with the formation of needle-like Li particles called dendrites. These particles negatively affect the battery by (1) becoming disconnected from the anode and thus unavailable to participate in the reaction and (2) increasing the risk of an internal short circuit which could cause thermal runaway and fire. At the cathode, the oxygen reduction reaction remains as big a challenge for Li-air batteries as it is for fuel cells. When the two reactions are combined, they form a mixture of insoluble products which are difficult to react in reverse and eventually choke the cathode.”

In their study, the researchers used an atomic force microscope (AFM) to investigate battery reversibility by analyzing the growth of Li particles. While sweeping the bias of a 20-nm AFM tip across the surface of a Li-ion conductive glass ceramic electrolyte, they measured the change in tip height during the cycling process. They found that increases and decreases in the tip height correspond to changes in current, allowing them to demonstrate the existence of reversibility as well as map the degree of reversibility at different locations.

In the future, the researchers hope to further improve the reversibility, and note that Li-air batteries still face many other challenges before they can become commercialized.

“Technological developments and systems engineering on all major components of Li-air batteries are required to bring this technology to market,” Kalinin said. “Better catalysts are needed on the cathode, Li protection without functional hindrance remains paramount, and superior multifunctional electrolytes need development. The ubiquitous necessity to understand fundamental processes at the most basic level of the key components remains a top priority. Only after a comprehensive understanding of the elementary processes is achieved can the chemistries be fine-tuned and the systems be properly engineered to meet the metrics demanded by the application.”

If researchers can overcome these challenges, Li-air batteries could potentially store energy for a wide variety of applications.

“If Li-air batteries could be realized, the primary application would be for transportation and other situations where mobility is necessary (like laptops, etc.) since they will be very lightweight for the amount of energy they store,” Arruda said. “Optimization of Li-air batteries to include a large number of charge/discharge cycles will drive down the cost and make fully electric vehicles a reality without the need for heavy batteries as is the current situation. Beyond this, it is easy to envision this technology (Li-air nanobatteries) being applied to microelectromechanical and nanoelectromechanical systems (MEMS and NEMS). These may be the ideal systems to employ such energy sources as they would have much lower energy demands and could operate for extended periods of time.”

Explore further

Li-Air: Argonne opens new chapter in battery research (w/ Video)

More information: Thomas M. Arruda, et al. “The partially reversible formation of Li-metal particles on a solid Li electrolyte: applications toward nanobatteries.” Nanotechnology 23 (2012) 325402 (9pp). DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/23/32/325402
Journal information: Nanotechnology

Copyright 2012 Phys.Org
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or part without the express written permission of

Citation: Researchers explore Li-air battery reversibility on the nanoscale (2012, August 8) retrieved 18 September 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Aug 08, 2012
How about encapsulating the reactants in micro- or nanocells, putting the lithium in little cages in amounts that are too small to form dendrites. That is, basically starving the cell of lithium, so you'd have too much electrolyte and cathode, but you'd decrease the unwanted reactions. You'd lose some energy density, but it would be more reversible. And since the other reactants would really want the little bit of lithium that's available, maybe you'd speed up the reaction, too.

Aug 08, 2012
You are aware that batteries are based on REVERSIBLE processes?

(And maybe also of the fact that forests don't create much oxygen. Plants use oxygen at night. The only positive carbon balance lies in dead plant matter that somehow doesn't manage to rot - all the rest of it is a zero sum game when it comes to oxygen)

Aug 08, 2012
Almost all groundbreaking scientific discoveries and refinements take so long to bring to a profitable and beneficial conclusion, the hapless public forgets about them before they ever, if ever, see the marketplace. Frustratingly slow, the pace of science, especially when it is supposed to benefit the planet and mankind.

Aug 09, 2012
Frustratingly slow, the pace of science,

1) It only seems slow because now the public does have access to what is happening in science. You get to know about things at a much earlier stage. The pace from research to product hasn't slowed (quite the contrary)

2) Many people have a thoroughly warped view of scientific work The media are to blame here. They regularly show "Revolutionary discovery to product in 5 minutes" in their movies. Many people have a hard time distinguishing movies from reality these days.

3) Science is hard work. Don't kid yourself about that. Sitting in front of a computer doing engineering and sitting in front of a computer doing science are WORLDS apart in terms of difficulty. Much more so if there is labwork involved. You can pour weeks/months/years of 12-hour days and weekends into things and come up empty. 'Normal' jobs just don't compare.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more