Hollywood studios lose landmark download case

Top Hollywood film studios Friday failed in their attempt to stem the flow of illegal downloads when they lost a landmark appeal against an Australian Internet provider.

A group of international and Australian companies, including Warner Bros, Disney and 20th Century Fox, alleged that iiNet authorised the infringement of their when its customers downloaded movies and television programmes.

In a world-first judgement in 2010, Australia's Federal Court ruled iiNet did not authorise the downloads or have the power to stop them, thwarting the studios' attempt to staunch losses they say run into billions of dollars.

The Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT), made up of 34 film, television and music companies, appealed, claiming it set a dangerous precedent that allowed Internet companies to ignore copyright theft.

But in a serious blow to their fight against piracy it was thrown out by Australia's highest court Friday.

"The High Court held that the respondent, an (ISP), had not authorised the infringement by its customers of the appellants' copyright in commercially released films and television programmes," the unanimous ruling said.

It added that iiNet had no direct technical power to prevent its customers from using the BitTorrent file sharing system to infringe copyright, by downloading content to watch on their laptops and PCs.

"Rather, the extent of iiNet's power to prevent its customers from infringing... copyright was limited to an indirect power to terminate its contractual relationship with its customers," the court said.

The case was seen as an ambitious attempt to force ISPs to act against piracy.

It hinged on thousands of downloads over the Perth-based iiNet network over 59 weeks from June 2008 involving nearly 90 films and TV series including "Batman Begins", "Transformers" and "Heroes".

The movie studios had hoped to set a worldwide precedent forcing ISPs to act against offenders, while Internet rights groups feared it would compel the firms to cut customers' web access without having to take them to court.

AFACT managing director Neil Gane said the judgement exposed the failure of copyright law to keep pace with the online environment.

"Both judgements in this case recognise that copyright law is no longer equipped to deal with the rate of technological change we have seen since the law of authorisation was last tested," he said.

Gane added that the global film and television industry, represented by the Los Angeles-based Motion Picture Association, was pursuing other avenues including targeting the software developers behind BitTorrent technology.

iiNet chief executive Michael Malone said the best way for the film industry to protect copyright was to boost the availability of lawful, online content in a more timely and affordable way.

He added that there was strong evidence that content partnerships and agreements between ISPs, legal websites and copyright holders was the best way to reduce piracy, rather than costly legal battles.

"Increasing the availability of licensed digital content is the best, most practical approach to meet consumer demand and protect copyright," Malone said.

"We have consistently said we are eager to work with the studios to make their very desirable material legitimately available to a waiting customer base and that offer remains the same today."

Explore further

Hollywood lodges appeal in Internet piracy case

(c) 2012 AFP

Citation: Hollywood studios lose landmark download case (2012, April 20) retrieved 23 September 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2012-04-hollywood-studios-landmark-download-case.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Apr 20, 2012
One major battle won... :-)

Apr 20, 2012
Yeah, we need weaker copyrights and patents, not stronger, that's the only way to avoid technological tyranny.

Apr 20, 2012
global film and television industry...was pursuing other avenues including targeting the software developers behind BitTorrent technology.

"Mr. Jones, your company makes hammers, right?"
"Those hammers have been used in the commission of crimes?"
"I rest my case, your Honor."

"...thwarting the studios' attempt to staunch losses they say run into billions of dollars."

As if each download represents a paying customer. A lot of crap movies that no one wants to pay to see get downloaded. If the pirating were thwarted, those people aren't going to rush out and buy legit copies of every B movie that strikes their fancy. Just sayin'.

Apr 21, 2012
The more the US corporatocracy overreaches its power and tramples over other sovereign nations' laws, the bigger the backlash will be. This is a good first step. Europe, now it's your turn to step up to the plate. Fuck you SOPA, PIPA, ACTA, CISPA!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more