Herschel spots comet massacre around nearby star

April 12, 2012
This image shows the infrared emission from the young star Fomalhaut and the dust disc surrounding it, as recorded with ESA's Herschel Space Observatory at a wavelength of 70 micron. To explain the emission from Fomalhaut's debris disc, astronomers invoke a steady production of dust particles via comet collisions, with an average rate of 2000 daily collisions between comets of one kilometre across or, alternatively, of 2 daily collisions between 10-kilometre-diameter comets. Credits: ESA/Herschel/PACS/Bram Acke, KU Leuven, Belgium

(Phys.org) -- ESA’s Herschel Space Observatory has studied the dusty belt around the nearby star Fomalhaut. The dust appears to be coming from collisions that destroy up to thousands of icy comets every day.

Fomalhaut is a young star, just a few hundred million years old, and twice as massive as the Sun. Its dust belt was discovered in the 1980s by the IRAS satellite, but Herschel’s new images of the belt show it in much more detail at far-infrared wavelengths than ever before.

Bram Acke, at the University of Leuven in Belgium, and colleagues analysed the Herschel observations and found the temperatures in the belt to be between –230 and –170ºC. However, because Fomalhaut is slightly off-centre and closer to the southern side of the belt, the southern side is warmer and brighter than the northern side.

Both the narrowness and asymmetry of the belt are thought to be due to the gravity of a possible planet in orbit around the star, as suggested by earlier Hubble Space Telescope images.

The Herschel data show that the dust in the belt has the thermal properties of small solid particles, with sizes of only a few millionths of a metre across.

But this created a paradox because the Hubble Space Telescope observations suggested solid grains more than ten times larger.

Those observations collected starlight scattering off the grains in the belt and showed it to be very faint at Hubble’s visible wavelengths, suggesting that the dust particles are relatively large. But that appears to be incompatible with the temperature of the belt as measured by Herschel in the far-infrared.

To resolve the paradox, Dr. Acke and colleagues suggest that the dust grains must be large fluffy aggregates, similar to dust particles released from comets in our own Solar System.  
These would have both the correct thermal and scattering properties. However, this leads to another problem.

The bright starlight from Fomalhaut should blow small dust particles out of the belt very rapidly, yet such grains appear to remain abundant there.

The only way to overcome this contradiction is to resupply the belt through continuous collisions between larger objects in orbit around Fomalhaut, creating new dust.

To sustain the belt, the rate of collisions must be impressive: each day, the equivalent of either two 10 km-sized comets or 2000 1 km-sized comets must be completely crushed into small fluffy, .

“I was really surprised,” says Dr. Acke, “To me this was an extremely large number.”

To keep the collision rate so high, there must be between 260 billion and 83 trillion comets in the belt, depending on their size. Our own Solar System has a similar number of comets in its Oort Cloud, which formed from objects scattered from a disc surrounding the Sun when it was as young as Fomalhaut.

“These beautiful Herschel images have provided the crucial information needed to model the nature of the dust belt around Fomalhaut,” says Göran Pilbratt, ESA Project Scientist.

Explore further: Existence of exoplanet 'Fomalhaut b' called into question

Related Stories

Existence of exoplanet 'Fomalhaut b' called into question

September 26, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Fomalhaut b, thought to be the first exoplanet photographed directly, has come under increased scrutiny due to evidence of an unexpected divergence from its expected orbit. Paul Kalas, James Graham and their ...

Unsettled Youth: Spitzer Observes a Chaotic Planetary System

November 4, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Before our planets found their way to the stable orbits they circle in today, they wiggled and jostled about like unsettled children. Now, NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope has found a young star with evidence ...

Herschel lives up to the family name

May 16, 2011

The Herschel Space Observatory has been observing the sky at infrared wavelengths since shortly after its launch two years ago, on 14th May 2009. But the name Herschel has a much longer legacy than that. The observatory is ...

Recommended for you

Vast luminous nebula poses a cosmic mystery

February 23, 2017

Astronomers have found an enormous, glowing blob of gas in the distant universe, with no obvious source of power for the light it is emitting. Called an "enormous Lyman-alpha nebula" (ELAN), it is the brightest and among ...

Does Pluto have the ingredients for life?

February 23, 2017

Pluto has long been viewed as a distant, cold and mostly dead world, but the first spacecraft to pass by it last year revealed many surprises about this distant dwarf planet.

Surprising dunes on comet Chury

February 22, 2017

Surprising images from the Rosetta spacecraft show the presence of dune-like patterns on the surface of comet Chury. Researchers at the Laboratoire de Physique et Mécanique des Milieux Hétérogènes (CNRS/ESPCI Paris/UPMC/Université ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (11) Apr 12, 2012
To keep the collision rate so high, there must be between 260 billion and 83 trillion comets in the belt, depending on their size. Our own Solar System has a similar number of comets in its Oort Cloud, which formed from objects scattered from a disc surrounding the Sun when it was as young as Fomalhaut

I'm glad they put these two statements in one paragraph. They both are indications of the same problem - not enough specimens of a particular item so they have to be replenished. BUT the replenishment itself is so spectacularly unlikely that a special unobservable and never recorded source has to be invented to keep the wobbly theory from falling apart under all the contradicting OBSERVATIONS.
Just how long would it take under normal actual physical conditions for those particles to be blown away by the solar energy? Unfortunately, much too quick to make the star even 1 millions years old. And yet there it is in all it's splendor. Hence the need for the most unlikely explanations
4 / 5 (14) Apr 12, 2012
When will you give up on your creationist trolling? You believe in a fairy tale about a magical invisible wizard who impregnated a woman with himself so he could sacrifice himself to himself in order to attone for sins that he created.

Yet you still have the balls to tell physicists with twice your IQ that they don't know what they're doing, even though you clearly have no knowledge of physics.
4 / 5 (4) Apr 12, 2012
pls dont feed the troll, just report him.
Maybe someday we can get rid of YECs and Crackpots
(at least in the comment section)
4.5 / 5 (8) Apr 12, 2012
Amen with the Troll eradication. I've read PhysOrg daily for about 7 years now and never commented because there is So Much Anti-Science Crap. Rarely do I see an actual exchange of relevant and well reasoned commentary uncontaminated by uninformed, animus laden peanut gallery "I'm sooooo intelligent and perceptive that I see through to the True Nature of All Things" JABBERWOCKERY! What a waste of perfectly good bandwidth! I would dearly love to carry on conversations with people who know way more than I do, but not everything. There, I've said it.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.